Mechanistic insights into how the epigenetic regulator Smchd1 interacts with and alters the chromatin

© 2018 Dr. Natasha JanszStructural Maintenance of Chromosomes, Hinge Domain containing 1 (Smchd1) is critical for the maintenance of X Chromosome Inactivation (XCI), and transcriptional repression at a subset of autosomal loci (Blewitt et al., 2008; Mould et al., 2013; Gendrel et al., 2013). Gain and loss of function mutations in SMCHD1 have been found to underlie Bosma arhinia micropthalmia syndrome (BAMS) and Facioscapulohumoral muscular dystrophy 2 (FSHD2), respectively - two distinct developmental disorders (Lemmers et al., 2012; Gordon et al., 2017; Shaw et al., 2017). Currently little is known about molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of Smchd1 in transcriptional repression or disease. This project aimed to better understand how Smchd1 associates with and influences the chromatin. There has been growing evidence in the literature to suggest that Smchd1 and the non-coding RNA Xist might interact directly (Nozawa et al., 2013; Kelsey et al., 2015; Minajigi et al., 2015). We have previously shown that the hinge domain of Smchd1 binds synthetic DNA and RNA oligonucleotides in vitro (Chen et al., 2015). I was therefore interested in whether Smchd1 directly associates with endogenous nucleic acids, and whether such interactions could be important for Smchd1's localisation to the chromatin. To this end, I performed PAR-CLIP to determine whether Smchd1 binds endogenous RNAs genome-wide. I find Smchd1-RNA interactions to be non-specific, and are therefore unlikely to act as a targeting mechanism. I also find that while Smchd1 is dependent on Xist for its localisation to the Xi, this is not due to a direct protein-RNA interaction, but rather due to a dependency on the downstream HnrnpK-polycomb pathway. Evidence from our lab has suggested that Smchd1 may be involved in regulating higher order chromatin organisation (Chen et al., 2015). To investigate changes to the chromatin architecture in the absence of Smchd1, I have performed in-situ Hi-C and ATAC-seq in Smchd1 wild-type and deleted neural stem cells. For the first time my data have demonstrated a role for Smchd1 in chromatin organisation of the Hox cluster, but also the inactive X chromosome. Furthermore, I have identified that in the absence of Smchd1, Hox genes are dysregulated, implicating Smchd1 in Hox gene silencing via a role in chromatin conformation. Taken together the results from the body of work I present here allow me to put forward a model, in which Smchd1 is recruited to target loci by the recognition of a PRC1-mediated chromatin structure. At these sites, I propose that Smchd1 is involved in the maintenance of long-range repressive chromatin structures, which limit promoter-enhancer interactions that are permissive for transcription, potentially by preventing binding of Ctcf, and therefore Ctcf-mediated looping events

Smchd1 Targeting to the Inactive X Is Dependent on the Xist-HnrnpK-PRC1 Pathway

Summary: We and others have recently reported that the SMC protein Smchd1 is a regulator of chromosome conformation. Smchd1 is critical for the structure of the inactive X chromosome and at autosomal targets such as the Hox genes. However, it is unknown how Smchd1 is recruited to these sites. Here, we report that Smchd1 localizes to the inactive X via the Xist-HnrnpK-PRC1 (polycomb repressive complex 1) pathway. Contrary to previous reports, Smchd1 does not bind Xist or other RNA molecules with any specificity. Rather, the localization of Smchd1 to the inactive X is H2AK119ub dependent. Following perturbation of this interaction, Smchd1 is destabilized, which has consequences for gene silencing genome-wide. Our work adds Smchd1 to the PRC1 silencing pathway for X chromosome inactivation. : Jansz et al. report that the chromatin protein Smchd1 depends on polycomb repressive complex 1-mediated ubiquitylation of histone H2A for its recruitment to the inactive X chromosome and for its protein stability. These data have implications for Smchd1 targeting genome-wide. Keywords: Smchd1, X inactivation, Xist, PRC1, Hnrnpk, Ring1

Somatic retrotransposition in the developing rhesus macaque brain.

The retrotransposon LINE-1 (L1) is central to the recent evolutionary history of the human genome and continues to drive genetic diversity and germline pathogenesis. However, the spatiotemporal extent and biological significance of somatic L1 activity are poorly defined and are virtually unexplored in other primates. From a single L1 lineage active at the divergence of apes and Old World monkeys, successive L1 subfamilies have emerged in each descendant primate germline. As revealed by case studies, the presently active human L1 subfamily can also mobilize during embryonic and brain development in vivo. It is unknown whether nonhuman primate L1s can similarly generate somatic insertions in the brain. Here we applied approximately 40× single-cell whole-genome sequencing (scWGS), as well as retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq), to 20 hippocampal neurons from two rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). In one animal, we detected and PCR-validated a somatic L1 insertion that generated target site duplications, carried a short 5' transduction, and was present in ∼7% of hippocampal neurons but absent from cerebellum and nonbrain tissues. The corresponding donor L1 allele was exceptionally mobile in vitro and was embedded in PRDM4, a gene expressed throughout development and in neural stem cells. Nanopore long-read methylome and RNA-seq transcriptome analyses indicated young retrotransposon subfamily activation in the early embryo, followed by repression in adult tissues. These data highlight endogenous macaque L1 retrotransposition potential, provide prototypical evidence of L1-mediated somatic mosaicism in a nonhuman primate, and allude to L1 mobility in the brain over the past 30 million years of human evolution

Comprehensive characterization of distinct states of human naive pluripotency generated by reprogramming

Recent reports on the characteristics of naive human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) obtained using independent methods differ. Naive hPSCs have been mainly derived by conversion from primed hPSCs or by direct derivation from human embryos rather than by somatic cell reprogramming. To provide an unbiased molecular and functional reference, we derived genetically matched naive hPSCs by direct reprogramming of fibroblasts and by primed-to-naive conversion using different naive conditions (NHSM, RSeT, 5iLAF and t2iLGoY). Our results show that hPSCs obtained in these different conditions display a spectrum of naive characteristics. Furthermore, our characterization identifies KLF4 as sufficient for conversion of primed hPSCs into naive t2iLGoY hPSCs, underscoring the role that reprogramming factors can play for the derivation of bona fide naive hPSCs

MOESM18 of Setdb1-mediated H3K9 methylation is enriched on the inactive X and plays a role in its epigenetic silencing

Additional file 18. shRNA Sequences. 97-mer shRNA oligonucleotides used to create the retroviral shRNAs for the X inactivation screen and additional hairpins used in this study. The common miR30 5’, loop and 3’ sequences are in black, the unique 21-mer stem sequences are in red and the mismatched bases are in blue

SMCHD1 has separable roles in chromatin architecture and gene silencing that could be targeted in disease

Abstract The interplay between 3D chromatin architecture and gene silencing is incompletely understood. Here, we report a novel point mutation in the non-canonical SMC protein SMCHD1 that enhances its silencing capacity at endogenous developmental targets. Moreover, it also results in enhanced silencing at the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy associated macrosatellite-array, D4Z4, resulting in enhanced repression of DUX4 encoded by this repeat. Heightened SMCHD1 silencing perturbs developmental Hox gene activation, causing a homeotic transformation in mice. Paradoxically, the mutant SMCHD1 appears to enhance insulation against other epigenetic regulators, including PRC2 and CTCF, while depleting long range chromatin interactions akin to what is observed in the absence of SMCHD1. These data suggest that SMCHD1’s role in long range chromatin interactions is not directly linked to gene silencing or insulating the chromatin, refining the model for how the different levels of SMCHD1-mediated chromatin regulation interact to bring about gene silencing in normal development and disease

SMCHD1 has separable roles in chromatin architecture and gene silencing that could be targeted in disease.

The interplay between 3D chromatin architecture and gene silencing is incompletely understood. Here, we report a novel point mutation in the non-canonical SMC protein SMCHD1 that enhances its silencing capacity at endogenous developmental targets. Moreover, it also results in enhanced silencing at the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy associated macrosatellite-array, D4Z4, resulting in enhanced repression of DUX4 encoded by this repeat. Heightened SMCHD1 silencing perturbs developmental Hox gene activation, causing a homeotic transformation in mice. Paradoxically, the mutant SMCHD1 appears to enhance insulation against other epigenetic regulators, including PRC2 and CTCF, while depleting long range chromatin interactions akin to what is observed in the absence of SMCHD1. These data suggest that SMCHD1's role in long range chromatin interactions is not directly linked to gene silencing or insulating the chromatin, refining the model for how the different levels of SMCHD1-mediated chromatin regulation interact to bring about gene silencing in normal development and disease