Comprehension of pictograms for pain quality and pain affect in adults with Down syndrome

Background Adults with Down syndrome (DS) are at risk for age-related painful physical conditions, but also for under-reporting pain. Pictograms may facilitate self-report of pain, because they seem suitable for the global visual processing in DS and for iconic representation of abstract concepts. Method Participants (N = 39, M age = 41.2) assigned pain qualities to pictograms, rated pain affect levels in facial scales (pictograms vs. drawn faces), and performed cognitive tests. Results Recognition of all intended pain qualities was above chance level. Pain affect levels of both facial scales were ordered equally well. Both facial scales were preferred equally we

Cancer Pain in People With Intellectual Disabilities:Systematic Review and Survey of Health Care Professionals

Context: Owing to life expectancy improvements for people with intellectual disabilities, their risk of developing cancer is increasing. Pain is an inevitable aspect of cancerous diseases. However, as pain experience and expression can be atypical in people with intellectual disabilities, this population is vulnerable to late diagnosis of cancer and undertreatment of cancer pain. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate what is currently known about cancer pain in people with intellectual disabilities and provide specific recommendations to improve this knowledge. Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL and an anonymous online survey of Dutch health care professionals were conducted. Results: From 10,146 publications, with intellectual disabilities in the title, and pain or cancer in the title or abstract, 11 articles underwent qualitative synthesis. Discussions within these articles were predominantly unspecific and brief, frequently indicating challenges in symptom presentation, communication, as well as assessment and treatment of cancer pain. The survey received 102 responses. The 63 health care professionals experienced with cancer in people with intellectual disabilities indicated challenges recognizing, assessing, and treating their cancer pain. Conclusion: Cancer pain in people with intellectual disabilities is a topic lacking specific and comprehensive research within scientific literature. We suggest this is due to inherent difficulties regarding the complex interplay of comorbidities and communication issues in people with intellectual disabilities

Table_1_EMDR treatment for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review about difficulties and adaptations.DOCX

IntroductionPeople with intellectual disabilities (ID) are at increased risk for developing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Emerging evidence indicates that Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy is feasible and potentially effective for this group. However, communication, cognition, stress regulation, and attachment difficulties may interfere with the EMDR process. Adaptation of the EMDR protocol seems therefore required for this population.AimThis review aims to systematically identify and categorize the difficulties in applying EMDR to people with ID and the adaptations made by therapists to overcome these challenges.MethodsA literature search was performed in May 2023. Article selection was based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality appraisal.ResultsAfter screening, 13 articles remained for further review. The identified difficulties and adaptations were categorized into the three domains of adaptive functioning (i.e., conceptual, social, and practical functioning). Considerable difficulties in applying the EMDR protocol for this group were reported. The adaptations made by therapists to overcome these difficulties were highly variable. They could be divided into three main categories: adaptions in EMDR delivery (e.g., tuning to the developmental level of the client, simplifying language, decreasing pace), involvement of others (e.g., involving family or support staff during or in between sessions), and the therapeutic relationship (e.g., taking more time, supportive attitude).DiscussionThe variability of the number of mentioned difficulties and adaptations per study seems to be partly related to the specific EMDR protocol that was used. In particular, when the Shapiro adult protocol was administered, relatively more detailed difficulties and adaptations were described than in publications based on derived existing versions of an EMDR protocol for children and adolescents. A probable explanation is that already embedded modifications in these protocols facilitate the needed attunement to the client’s level of functioning.Practical implicationsThe authors of this review suggest that EMDR protocols for children and adolescents could be adapted for people with an intellectual disability. Further research should focus on the involvement of trusted others in EMDR therapy for people with ID and the therapeutic relationship from an attachment and relational-based perspective.</p

Pijn en neurocognitieve stoornissen: stand van zaken en de weg nog te gaan

The detection and treatment of pain is hampered by cognitive disorders. In this review we discuss the epidemiology of pain in cognitive disorders, and elaborate further on the current state of the art on pain in these populations. We will specifically highlight current gaps and recommendations for the future for the following knowledge domains: 1) Biology and neuropathology, 2) Assessment and evaluation, 3) Treatment and management, and 4) Contextual factors such as the organization and education. We identify the following knowledge gaps: 1) (Biology): Do pain experience and pain expressions change in different types of cognitive disorders, and how? 2) (Assessment): How to recognize, evaluate and assess pain, in case the self-report of pain is no longer reliable? 3) (Treatment): Which treatment possibilities are effective? How can we organize this in an interdisciplinary way? And how to monitor this? How can we ensure proper implementation of pain assessment and treatment in clinical practice? Specifically with regard to non-pharmacological treatment, how can we communicate observations from different disciplines, family members and clinicians to improve the detection of pain as well as treatment monitoring/evaluation? 4) (Contextual): How can we increase knowledge and skills on pain in cognitive impairment within educational training?

Pijn en neurocognitieve stoornissen: stand van zaken en de weg nog te gaan

Cognitieve stoornissen kunnen de beleving van pijn veranderen en de diagnostiek en behandeling bemoeilijken. In deze review wordt vanuit een interdisciplinair perspectief de epidemiologie van pijn bij cognitieve stoornissen en de stand van zaken besproken, en samengevat waar de kennishiaten nog liggen. Dit wordt gedaan vanuit vier domeinen, namelijk 1) biologie en neuropathologie, 2) beoordeling en assessment, 3) behandeling en management, en 4) contextuele factoren zoals organisatie en opleiding. De kennishiaten bij deze 4 domeinen zijn: 1) (Biologie): Hoe verandert de pijnervaring en de uiting van pijn bij de verschillende vormen van cognitieve stoornissen? Wat zijn de oorzaak en de gevolgen van pijn in deze groepen? 2) (Assessment): Hoe herkennen, beoordelen en meten we pijn goed, als zelfrapportage niet betrouwbaar is? 3) (Behandeling): Welke behandelingen voor pijn zijn effectief? Hoe kun je die goed interdisciplinair uitvoeren? Hoe zorgen we voor goede implementatie van pijn meten en pijnbehandeling? Vooral ook van niet-farmacologisch behandelen, hoe kunnen we observaties tussen verschillende disciplines, of tussen familie en zorgverleners, beter communiceren zodat herkenning van pijn, en monitoring/evaluatie van behandeling wordt verbeterd? 4) (Contextueel): Wat kunnen we in het onderwijs doen om meer begrip, kennis en vaardigheden op dit gebied te ontwikkelen