29 research outputs found
Algebraizable Weak Logics
We extend the standard framework of abstract algebraic logic to the setting
of logics which are not closed under uniform substitution. We introduce the
notion of weak logics as consequence relations closed under limited forms of
substitutions and we give a modified definition of algebraizability that
preserves the uniqueness of the equivalent algebraic semantics of algebraizable
logics. We provide several results for this novel framework, in particular a
connection between the algebraizability of a weak logic and the standard
algebraizability of its schematic fragment. We apply this framework to the
context of logics defined over team semantics and we show that the classical
version of inquisitive and dependence logic is algebraizable, while their
intuitionistic versions are not
Fully Automated Fact Checking Using External Sources
Given the constantly growing proliferation of false claims online in recent
years, there has been also a growing research interest in automatically
distinguishing false rumors from factually true claims. Here, we propose a
general-purpose framework for fully-automatic fact checking using external
sources, tapping the potential of the entire Web as a knowledge source to
confirm or reject a claim. Our framework uses a deep neural network with LSTM
text encoding to combine semantic kernels with task-specific embeddings that
encode a claim together with pieces of potentially-relevant text fragments from
the Web, taking the source reliability into account. The evaluation results
show good performance on two different tasks and datasets: (i) rumor detection
and (ii) fact checking of the answers to a question in community question
answering forums.Comment: RANLP-201
Gpachov at CheckThat! 2023: A Diverse Multi-Approach Ensemble for Subjectivity Detection in News Articles
The wide-spread use of social networks has given rise to subjective,
misleading, and even false information on the Internet. Thus, subjectivity
detection can play an important role in ensuring the objectiveness and the
quality of a piece of information. This paper presents the solution built by
the Gpachov team for the CLEF-2023 CheckThat! lab Task~2 on subjectivity
detection. Three different research directions are explored. The first one is
based on fine-tuning a sentence embeddings encoder model and dimensionality
reduction. The second one explores a sample-efficient few-shot learning model.
The third one evaluates fine-tuning a multilingual transformer on an altered
dataset, using data from multiple languages. Finally, the three approaches are
combined in a simple majority voting ensemble, resulting in 0.77 macro F1 on
the test set and achieving 2nd place on the English subtask
Quantitative polynomial functors
Data types are the basic building blocks of modern type theories and programming languages. Having more powerful data types around can increase the proof-theoretic strength of the theory, i.e., allow more programs to be written, and can also make existing proofs/programs more convenient to write. Recent advances in type theories such as cubical type theory have also been accompanied by advances in data type theory, such as quotient and higher inductive types. In this paper, we explore what a corresponding notion of (non-higher, so far) inductive types for the also recently introduced type theory Quantitative Type Theory (QTT) might be. QTT combines dependent types and linear types, in the sense of linear logic. By using linearity to track variable (and hence resource) usage of programs, QTT thus promises to enable formal reasoning about both functional and non-functional correctness of programs. A variant of QTT is implemented in the Idris 2 programming language, and we hope that our work can be used as a foundational justification for the implementation of data types there. Conversely, we have used Idris 2 to mechanically verify parts of our development
Fact Checking in Community Forums
Community Question Answering (cQA) forums are very popular nowadays, as they
represent effective means for communities around particular topics to share
information. Unfortunately, this information is not always factual. Thus, here
we explore a new dimension in the context of cQA, which has been ignored so
far: checking the veracity of answers to particular questions in cQA forums. As
this is a new problem, we create a specialized dataset for it. We further
propose a novel multi-faceted model, which captures information from the answer
content (what is said and how), from the author profile (who says it), from the
rest of the community forum (where it is said), and from external authoritative
sources of information (external support). Evaluation results show a MAP value
of 86.54, which is 21 points absolute above the baseline.Comment: AAAI-2018; Fact-Checking; Veracity; Community-Question Answering;
Neural Networks; Distributed Representation
Algebraizable Weak Logics
We extend the standard framework of abstract algebraic logic to the setting of logics which are not closed under uniform substitution. We introduce the notion of weak logics as consequence relations closed under limited forms of substitutions and we give a modified definition of algebraizability that preserves the uniqueness of the equivalent algebraic semantics of algebraizable logics. We provide several results for this novel framework, in particular a connection between the algebraizability of a weak logic and the standard algebraizability of its schematic fragment. We apply this framework to the context of logics defined over team semantics and we show that the classical version of inquisitive and dependence logic is algebraizable, while their intuitionistic versions are not