Sustained response after a 2-year course of lamivudine treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72882/1/j.1365-2893.2004.00556.x.pd

Hepatitis B Therapy in Pregnancy

All decisions about initiating, continuing, or stopping therapy of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) during pregnancy must include an analysis of the risks and benefits for mother and fetus. The trimester of the pregnancy and the stage of the mother’s liver disease are important factors. Treatment in the third trimester may be initiated to aid in preventing perinatal transmission, which appears to be most pronounced in mothers with high viral loads. Consideration of initiating treatment in the third trimester should occur after a high viral load is documented in the latter part of the second trimester, to allow adequate time for initiation of antiviral therapy with significant viral suppression before delivery. This discussion should include the topic of breastfeeding, because it is generally not recommended while receiving antiviral therapy. Currently, lamivudine and tenofovir appear to be the therapeutic options with the most reasonable safety data in pregnancy

The importance of baseline viral load when assessing relative efficacy in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To date no network meta-analysis (NMA) has accounted for baseline variations in viral load when assessing the relative efficacy of interventions for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We undertook baseline-adjusted and unadjusted analyses using the same data to explore the impact of baseline viral load (BVL) on CHB treatment response. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, Medline in Process and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of monotherapy interventions at licensed doses for use in CHB. Search strategies comprised CHB disease and drug terms (a combination of controlled vocabulary and free text terms) and also a bespoke RCT filter.The NMA was undertaken in WinBUGs using fixed and random effects methods, using data obtained from a systematic review. Individual patient data (IPD) from an entecavir clinical trial were used to quantify the impact of different baseline characteristics (in particular undetectable viral load (UVL) at 1 year) on relative treatment effect. Study level mean baseline values from all identified studies were used. Results were generated for UVL and presented as relative risks (RRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) using entecavir as reference treatment. RESULTS: Overall, for all eight relevant interventions we identified 3,000 abstracts. Following full text review a total of 35 (including the contents of six clinical study reports) met the inclusion critera; 19 were in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients and 14 of the 19 contained outcome information of relevance to the NMA.Entecavir and tenofovir studies had heterogeneous patient populations in terms of BVL (mean values 9.29 and 8.65 log10 copies/ml respectively). After adjusting UVL for BVL using an informative prior based on the IPD analysis, the difference between entecavir and tenofovir was not statistically significant (RR 1.27, 95% CrI 0.96 to 1.47-fixed effects). A similar conclusion was found in all sensitivity analyses. Adjusted tenofovir results were more consistent with observed clinical trial response rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of adjusting for BVL when assessing the relative efficacy of CHB interventions in achieving UVL. This has implications for both clinical and economic decision making

A comparison of four fibrosis indexes in chronic HCV: Development of new fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hepatitis C can lead to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. We compared readily available non-invasive fibrosis indexes for the fibrosis progression discrimination to find a better combination of existing non-invasive markers.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied 157 HCV infected patients who underwent liver biopsy. In order to differentiate HCV fibrosis progression, readily available AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 serum indexes were tested in the patients. We derived a new fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) comprised of ALP, bilirubin, serum albumin and platelet count. FCI = [(ALP × Bilirubin) / (Albumin × Platelet count)].</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Already established serum indexes AAR, APRI, FI and FIB-4 were able to stage liver fibrosis with correlation coefficient indexes 0.130, 0.444, 0.578 and 0.494, respectively. Our new fibrosis cirrhosis index FCI significantly correlated with the histological fibrosis stages F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4 (r = 0.818, p < 0.05) with AUROCs 0.932 and 0.996, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of FCI at a cutoff value < 0.130 for predicting fibrosis stage F0-F1 was 81% and 82%, respectively with AUROC 0.932. Corresponding value of FCI at a cutoff value ≥1.25 for the prediction of cirrhosis was 86% and 100%.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fibrosis-cirrhosis index (FCI) accurately predicted fibrosis stages in HCV infected patients and seems more efficient than frequently used serum indexes.</p

Histopathology of chronic hepatitis C in relation to epidemiological factors

Background/Aims: To evaluate the clinicopathological features of chronic hepatitis C, 170 liver biopsies were studied and histological grade and stage (degree of fibrosis) of hepatitis were correlated with epidemiological features and characteristic histological findings. Methods/Results: Normal liver was found in 3 (1.8%), minimal chronic hepatitis in 40 (23.5%), mild chronic hepatitis in 104 (61.2%) and moderate chronic hepatitis in 23 (13.5%) cases. Cirrhosis was observed in 24 (14.1%) patients and was more frequently encountered among patients more than 40 years old (34.4% vs 2.8%, p&lt;10(-6)) and rarely among intravenous drug users in comparison with post-transfusion and sporadic cases (3% vs 25% and 20% respectively, p&lt;0.005). Minimal chronic hepatitis was more frequently observed among patients 40 years old or younger (30.3% vs 11.5%, p&lt;0.01)), while moderate chronic hepatitis was significantly more common in older age groups (24.6% vs 7.3%, p&lt;0.005). Multiple regression analysis revealed that only age was statistically related to histological grade and stage of hepatitis (p&lt;10(-5)). The frequency of the histological features more likely seen in chronic hepatitis C, including steatosis (57.6%), lymphoid follicles and/or aggregates (F/A) (47.1%) and bile duct lesions (22.9%), increased with hepatitis grade and the latter two features were more often encountered in moderate chronic hepatitis (p&lt;0.005); in addition, both lesions statistically coexisted (p&lt;0.005). No correlation was found between histological findings and possible source of infection. Conclusions: More than half of the chronic hepatitis C patients presented mild histological lesions. Age was proven to be the only independent epidemiological factor related to histological grade and stage of hepatitis. Lymphoid F/A and bile duct damage are important diagnostic findings associated with hepatitis activity