17 research outputs found

    Machine learning-based prediction of breast cancer growth rate in-vivo

    Get PDF
    BackgroundDetermining the rate of breast cancer (BC) growth in vivo, which can predict prognosis, has remained elusive despite its relevance for treatment, screening recommendations and medicolegal practice. We developed a model that predicts the rate of in vivo tumour growth using a unique study cohort of BC patients who had two serial mammograms wherein the tumour, visible in the diagnostic mammogram, was missed in the first screen.MethodsA serial mammography-derived in vivo growth rate (SM-INVIGOR) index was developed using tumour volumes from two serial mammograms and time interval between measurements. We then developed a machine learning-based surrogate model called Surr-INVIGOR using routinely assessed biomarkers to predict in vivo rate of tumour growth and extend the utility of this approach to a larger patient population. Surr-INVIGOR was validated using an independent cohort.ResultsSM-INVIGOR stratified discovery cohort patients into fast-growing versus slow-growing tumour subgroups, wherein patients with fast-growing tumours experienced poorer BC-specific survival. Our clinically relevant Surr-INVIGOR stratified tumours in the discovery cohort and was concordant with SM-INVIGOR. In the validation cohort, Surr-INVIGOR uncovered significant survival differences between patients with fast-growing and slow-growing tumours.ConclusionOur Surr-INVIGOR model predicts in vivo BC growth rate during the pre-diagnostic stage and offers several useful applications

    The role of letrozole (FEMARA®) in breast cancer therapy: A clinical review

    No full text
    Letrozole is a third-generation aromatase inhibitor for use in postmenopausal women with hormonal-sensitive breast cancer. This drug was found to reduce or effectively shrink tumors in a significant number of such patients. It exhibits antitumor activity at a relatively low daily dose, and is highly potent and selective and well tolerated. Results from recent phase III clinical studies have confirmed the efficacy and the key role of this drug in the therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Moreover, letrozole demonstrated higher activity and lower toxicity compared to tamoxifen in the first-line therapy of postmenopausal women affected with advanced breast cancer. However, it also represents a valid option in second-line therapy after tamoxifen failure. New data on this agent in adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment also suggest efficacy in the treatment of early breast cancer. This article reviews the clinical data on letrozole in all settings and its future potential in chemoprevention. (C) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved

    Behaviour of metastasis in relation to vascular index in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen

    No full text
    Some experimental studies suggested that one possible oestrogen-receptor-unrelated mechanism of action of tamoxifen involves inhibition of angiogenesis. We evaluated the correlation of the degree of vascularisation of the primary tumour and we assessed it by using the panendothelial marker anti-CD31 and immunohistochemistry with microvessels count, performed at the vascular 'hot spot' of each single cancer, with the risk of recurrence in time. A cohort of 176 consecutive patients with node-positive invasive breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen (30 mg/daily for 3 years) and a median follow-up of 72 months was studied. Sixty-two patients developed metastasis (30 visceral, 18 skeletal and 14 in soft tissues) during the time of observation. The study of the hazard function for metastasis was performed by a generalized linear modelling approach with a binomial error according to Efron. The risk of first recurrence was strictly associated with vascular index, having the patients with the highest microvessel counts the highest risk of metastasis during all the period of observation. We did not find an interaction of vascularity with oestrogen receptor (ER) status. However, in the subgroup of patients with ER-positive tumours the hazard of metastasis was almost constant in time, while in that with ER-negative tumours it increased rapidly up to 20 months and, thereafter, decreased sharply. The results of our study are an indirect evidence that the patients with highly vascularized breast cancers may gain poor benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen and, therefore. that this antioestrogen is unlikely to retain a clinically relevant antiangiogenic activity in human breast cancer. Our data need confirmation by a prospective randomized clinical trial

    Rationale for the use of gemcitabine in breast cancer (Review)

    No full text
    Many active cytotoxic drugs and several regimens exist for breast cancer therapy. However, these conventional treatments have not changed the outcome of patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease. As a consequence, the dynamic balance between chemotherapy-induced side effects and benefits attributable to relief of cancer-related symptoms must be carefully considered in this setting. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite that has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, a good toxicity profile, and non-overlapping toxicity with other chemotherapeutic drugs. As a single agent, gemcitabine yields response rates ranging from 14 to 37% as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer and 12-30% as salvage therapy for patients previously treated with anthracycline and/or taxane treatment. Combined with vinorelbine, platinum, anthracyclines, and taxanes as doublets or triplets, response rates of 50 to 80% have been reported in phase II clinical studies. Gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines and taxanes has been evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with early-stage breast cancer with interesting clinical and pathological response rates. Preliminary results of gemcitabine in combination with the biologic agent, trastuzumab, are encouraging. Phase III trials of gemcitabine combinations compared to standard regimens are ongoing with the aim to assess the independent contribution of gemcitabine

    Current status and future potential role of exemestane in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer (Review)

    No full text
    Exemestane is a new oral steroidal aromatase inactivator, active in postmenopausal women with hormonal sensitive breast carcinoma. This drug, at a dosage of 25 mg once daily, was shown to suppress in vivo aromatase activity by 97.9%, with a subsequent reduction superior to 85% of circulating oestrogen level. It exhibits definite antitumor activity at a relatively low daily dose, and is highly potent, highly selective, and well-tolerated. Moreover, for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer, exemestane demonstrated a higher activity and lower toxicity profile when compared to megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in second- and first-line therapy, respectively. New data on exemestane are forthcoming both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, which could improve the management of early breast cancer in the future

    Sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class A and B advanced hepatocellular carcinoma : a prospective feasibility analysis

    No full text
    BackgroundSorafenib has shown survival benefits in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh (CP) class A liver function. There are few prospective data on sorafenib in patients with HCC and CP class B.Patients and methodsA consecutive prospective series of 300 patients with CP class A or B HCC were enrolled in a dual-phase trial to determine survival and safety data according to liver function (class A or B) in patients receiving oral sorafenib 800\ua0mg daily. [Results of this study were presented in part at the ASCO 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 19-21 January 2012. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (Suppl 4): abstract 306.]ResultsOverall progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9, 4.1 and 9.1 months, respectively. For patients with CP class A versus B status, PFS was 4.3 versus 2.1 months, TTP was 4.2 versus 3.8 months and OS was 10.0 versus 3. 8 months. Extrahepatic spread was associated with worse outcomes but taken together with CP class, liver function played a greater role in reducing survival. Adverse events for the two CP groups were similar.ConclusionAlthough patients with HCC and CP class B liver function have poorer outcomes than those with CP class A function, data suggest that patients with CP class B liver function can tolerate treatment and may still benefit from sorafenib

    Sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class A and B advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective feasibility analysis.

    No full text
    Background: Sorafenib has shown survival benefits in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh (CP) class A liver function. There are few prospective data on sorafenib in patients with HCC and CP class B. Patients and methods: A consecutive prospective series of 300 patients with CP class A or B HCC were enrolled in a dual-phase trial to determine survival and safety data according to liver function (class A or B) in patients receiving oral sorafenib 800 mg daily. [Results of this study were presented in part at the ASCO 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 19-21 January 2012. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (Suppl 4): abstract 306.]. Results: Overall progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9, 4.1 and 9.1 months, respectively. For patients with CP class A versus B status, PFS was 4.3 versus 2.1 months, TTP was 4.2 versus 3.8 months and OS was 10.0 versus 3. 8 months. Extrahepatic spread was associated with worse outcomes but taken together with CP class, liver function played a greater role in reducing survival. Adverse events for the two CP groups were similar. Conclusion: Although patients with HCC and CP class B liver function have poorer outcomes than those with CP class A function, data suggest that patients with CP class B liver function can tolerate treatment and may still benefit from sorafenib. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved
    corecore