Understanding the relation between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and adverse fetal, infant and child outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of pregnant women and their infants and children

IntroductionZika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy is a known cause of microcephaly and other congenital and developmental anomalies. In the absence of a ZIKV vaccine or prophylactics, principal investigators (PIs) and international leaders in ZIKV research have formed the ZIKV Individual Participant Data (IPD) Consortium to identify, collect and synthesise IPD from longitudinal studies of pregnant women that measure ZIKV infection during pregnancy and fetal, infant or child outcomes.Methods and analysisWe will identify eligible studies through the ZIKV IPD Consortium membership and a systematic review and invite study PIs to participate in the IPD meta-analysis (IPD-MA). We will use the combined dataset to estimate the relative and absolute risk of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), including microcephaly and late symptomatic congenital infections; identify and explore sources of heterogeneity in those estimates and develop and validate a risk prediction model to identify the pregnancies at the highest risk of CZS or adverse developmental outcomes. The variable accuracy of diagnostic assays and differences in exposure and outcome definitions means that included studies will have a higher level of systematic variability, a component of measurement error, than an IPD-MA of studies of an established pathogen. We will use expert testimony, existing internal and external diagnostic accuracy validation studies and laboratory external quality assessments to inform the distribution of measurement error in our models. We will apply both Bayesian and frequentist methods to directly account for these and other sources of uncertainty.Ethics and disseminationThe IPD-MA was deemed exempt from ethical review. We will convene a group of patient advocates to evaluate the ethical implications and utility of the risk stratification tool. Findings from these analyses will be shared via national and international conferences and through publication in open access, peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017068915).</jats:sec

Pneumococcal Nasopharyngeal Carriage Among Infants Born to Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Mothers Immunized With Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine During Gestation

Background: We have previously shown that 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) is immunogenic in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected mothers and provides vaccine-induced antibodies to the infant. We compared the nasopharyngeal pneumococcal colonization (NPC) rates in <6-month-old infants born to HIV-infected mothers, according to immunization with PPV during pregnancy. Methods: NPC was evaluated in 45 term infants born to vaccinated women (PPV+) and in 60 infants in a control group (PPV-), at 2 months (+/- 30 days), 4 months (+/- 30 days), and 6 months (+/- 30 days) of age. Results: A total of 82 infants completed the study (at least 2 of 3 evaluations), 35 (77%) in the PPV+ and 47 (78.3%) in the PPV- groups, respectively. Infant gender, HIV infection status, number of adults, children, and smokers in the household, day-care attendance, occurrence of respiratory signs, and cotrimoxazole use were similar in both groups. NPC rates increased equally with age in both groups (2 months = 26.7% vs. 25.6%; 4 months = 34.5% vs. 38.6%; 6 months = 38.7% vs. 56.3%, in PPV+ and PPV-, respectively). After controlling for potential confounders, we found no association between maternal vaccination and infant pneumococcal carriage (adjusted odds ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.23, 2.21) Conclusions: Vaccination of HIV-infected mothers with PPV did not protect infants younger than 6 months of age from nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage.Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil (FAPESP)[02/01294-3

Human cytomegalovirus reinfection is associated with intrauterine transmission in a highly cytomegalovirus-immune maternal population

OBJECTIVE: To determine contribution of reinfection with new strains of cytomegalovirus in cytomegalovirus seromimmune women to incidence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. STUDY DESIGN: In 7848 women studied prospectively for congenital cytomegalovirus infection from a population with near universal cytomegalovirus seroimmunity, sera from 40 mothers of congenitally infected infants and 109 mothers of uninfected newborns were analyzed for strain-specific anticytomegalovirus antibodies. RESULTS: All women were cytomegalovirus seroimmune at first prenatal visit. Reactivity for 2 cytomegalovirus strains was found in 14 of 40 study mothers and in 17 of 109 control mothers at first prenatal visit (P=.009). Seven of 40 (17.5%) study women and 5 of 109 (4.6%) controls (P=.002) acquired antibodies reactive with new cytomegalovirus strains during pregnancy. Evidence of infection with more than 1 strain of cytomegalovirus before or during current pregnancy occurred in 21 of 40 study mothers and 22 of 109 controls (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Maternal reinfection by new strains of cytomegalovirus is a major source of congenital infection in this population.National Institutes of Health (NIH)[NIAID AI 49537]National Institutes of Health (NIH)[R03 TW006480]National Institutes of Health (NIH)[NIDCD DC04162]Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil[02/04166-6

Three Postpartum Antiretroviral Regimens to Prevent Intrapartum HIV Infection

BACKGROUNDThe safety and efficacy of adding antiretroviral drugs to standard zidovudine prophylaxis in infants of mothers with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who did not receive antenatal antiretroviral therapy (ART) because of late identification are unclear. We evaluated three ART regimens in such infants.METHODSWithin 48 hours after their birth, we randomly assigned formula-fed infants born to women with a peripartum diagnosis of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infection to one of three regimens: zidovudine for 6 weeks (zidovudine-alone group), zidovudine for 6 weeks plus three doses of nevirapine during the first 8 days of life (two-drug group), or zidovudine for 6 weeks plus nelfinavir and lamivudine for 2 weeks (three-drug group). The primary outcome was HIV-1 infection at 3 months in infants uninfected at birth.RESULTS A total of 1684 infants were enrolled in the Americas and South Africa (566 in the zidovudine-alone group, 562 in the two-drug group, and 556 in the three-drug group). The overall rate of in utero transmission of HIV-1 on the basis of Kaplan-Meier estimates was 5.7% (93 infants), with no significant differences among the groups. Intrapartum transmission occurred in 24 infants in the zidovudine-alone group (4.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2 to 7.1), as compared with 11 infants in the two-drug group (2.2%; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.9; P=0.046) and 12 in the three-drug group (2.4%; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.3; P=0.046). The overall transmission rate was 8.5% (140 infants), with an increased rate in the zidovudine-alone group (P=0.03 for the comparisons with the two-and three-drug groups). On multivariate analysis, zidovudine monotherapy, a higher maternal viral load, and maternal use of illegal substances were significantly associated with transmission. The rate of neutropenia was significantly increased in the three-drug group (P < 0.001 for both comparisons with the other groups).CONCLUSIONS In neonates whose mothers did not receive ART during pregnancy, prophylaxis with a two-or three-drug ART regimen is superior to zidovudine alone for the prevention of intrapartum HIV transmission; the two-drug regimen has less toxicity than the three-drug regimen. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00099359.)NICHDHIV Prevention Trials NetworkNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)National Institute of Mental HealthUniv Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USAEunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, NIH, Bethesda, MD USAWestat Corp, Rockville, MD USAFundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Lab Pesquisa Clin DST & AIDS, Inst Pesquisa Clin Evandro Chagas, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilFundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Lab AIDS & Imunol Mol, Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilFundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Lab Informacoes Saude, Inst Informacao Cient & Tecnol Saude, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilHosp Fed Servidores Estado, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilHosp Geral Nova Iguacu, Rio De Janeiro, BrazilUniv Witwatersrand, Perinatal HIV Res Unit, Johannesburg, South AfricaChris Hani Baragwanath Hosp, Johannesburg, South AfricaUniv Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South AfricaTygerberg Hosp, Cape Town, South AfricaHosp Conceicao, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilHosp Femina, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilIrmandade Santa Casa Misericordia Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USAFdn Maternal & Infant Hlth, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaBoston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilNICHD: HHSN267200800001CNICHD: N01-HD-8-0001National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): U01 AI047986National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): U01 AI068632National Institute of Mental Health: AI068632Web of Scienc