Exploring magnetohydrodynamic voltage distributions in the human body : Preliminary results

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to noninvasively measure regional contributions of vasculature in the human body using magnetohydrodynamic voltages (VMHD) obtained from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings performed inside MRI's static magnetic field (B0). Integrating the regional VMHD over the Swave-Twave segment of the cardiac cycle (Vsegment) provides a non-invasive method for measuring regional blood volumes, which can be rapidly obtained during MRI without incurring additional cost. METHODS: VMHD was extracted from 12-lead ECG traces acquired during gradual introduction into a 3T MRI. Regional contributions were computed utilizing weights based on B0's strength at specified distances from isocenter. Vsegment mapping was performed in six subjects and validated against MR angiograms (MRA). RESULTS: Fluctuations in Vsegment, which presented as positive trace deflections, were found to be associated with aortic-arch flow in the thoracic cavity, the main branches of the abdominal aorta, and the bifurcation of the common iliac artery. The largest fluctuation corresponded to the location where the aortic arch was approximately orthogonal to B0. The smallest fluctuations corresponded to areas of vasculature that were parallel to B0. Significant correlations (specifically, Spearman's ranked correlation coefficients of 0.96 and 0.97 for abdominal and thoracic cavities, respectively) were found between the MRA and Vsegment maps (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel non-invasive method to extract regional blood volumes from ECGs was developed and shown to be a rapid means to quantify peripheral and abdominal blood volumes

Effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on cardiac function in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a disease with limited evidence-based treatment options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) offer benefit in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their impact in HFpEF remains unclear. We therefore evaluated the effect of MRA on echocardiographic, functional, and systemic parameters in patients with HFpEF by a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Clinical Trial Collection to identify randomized controlled trials that (a) compared MRA versus placebo/control in patients with HFpEF and (b) reported echocardiographic, functional, and/or systemic parameters relevant to HFpEF. Studies were excluded if: they enrolled asymptomatic patients; patients with HFrEF; patients after an acute coronary event; compared MRA to another active comparator; or reported a follow-up of less than 6 months. Primary outcomes were changes in echocardiographic parameters. Secondary end-points were changes in functional capacity, quality of life measures, and systemic parameters. Quantitative analysis was performed by generating forest plots and calculating effect sizes by random-effect models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed through Q and I2 statistics. Nine trials with 1164 patients were included. MRA significantly decreased E/e′ (mean difference − 1.37, 95% confidence interval − 1.72 to − 1.02), E/A (− 0.04, − 0.08 to 0.00), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (− 0.78 mm, − 1.34 to − 0.22), left atrial volume index (− 1.12 ml/m2, − 1.91 to − 0.33), 6-min walk test distance (− 11.56 m, − 21 to − 2.13), systolic (− 4.75 mmHg, − 8.94 to − 0.56) and diastolic blood pressure (− 2.91 mmHg, − 4.15 to − 1.67), and increased levels of serum potassium (0.23 mmol/L, 0.19 to 0.28) when compared with placebo/control. In patients with HFpEF, MRA treatment significantly improves indices of cardiac structure and function, suggesting a decrease in left ventricular filling pressure and reverse cardiac remodeling. MRA increase serum potassium and decrease blood pressure; however, a small decrease in 6-min-walk distance is also noted. Larger prospective studies are warranted to provide definitive answers on the effect of MRA in patients with HFpEF

Understanding heterogeneous mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction through cardiorenal mathematical modeling.

In contrast to heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), effective interventions for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have proven elusive, in part because it is a heterogeneous syndrome with incompletely understood pathophysiology. This study utilized mathematical modeling to evaluate mechanisms distinguishing HFpEF and HFrEF. HF was defined as a state of chronically elevated left ventricle end diastolic pressure (LVEDP > 20mmHg). First, using a previously developed cardiorenal model, sensitivities of LVEDP to potential contributing mechanisms of HFpEF, including increased myocardial, arterial, or venous stiffness, slowed ventricular relaxation, reduced LV contractility, hypertension, or reduced venous capacitance, were evaluated. Elevated LV stiffness was identified as the most sensitive factor. Large LV stiffness increases alone, or milder increases combined with either decreased LV contractility, increased arterial stiffness, or hypertension, could increase LVEDP into the HF range without reducing EF. We then evaluated effects of these mechanisms on mechanical signals of cardiac outward remodeling, and tested the ability to maintain stable EF (as opposed to progressive EF decline) under two remodeling assumptions: LV passive stress-driven vs. strain-driven remodeling. While elevated LV stiffness increased LVEDP and LV wall stress, it mitigated wall strain rise for a given LVEDP. This suggests that if LV strain drives outward remodeling, a stiffer myocardium will experience less strain and less outward dilatation when additional factors such as impaired contractility, hypertension, or arterial stiffening exacerbate LVEDP, allowing EF to remain normal even at high filling pressures. Thus, HFpEF heterogeneity may result from a range of different pathologic mechanisms occurring in an already stiffened myocardium. Together, these simulations further support LV stiffening as a critical mechanism contributing to elevated cardiac filling pressures; support LV passive strain as the outward dilatation signal; offer an explanation for HFpEF heterogeneity; and provide a mechanistic explanation distinguishing between HFpEF and HFrEF

Circulating Proangiogenic Cell Activity Is Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Vascular injury mobilizes bone marrow–derived proangiogenic cells into the circulation, where these cells can facilitate vascular repair and new vessel formation. We sought to determine the relationship between a new biomarker of circulating bone marrow–derived proangiogenic cell activity, the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Circulating proangiogenic cell activity was estimated using a reproducible angiogenic colonyforming unit (CFU-A) assay in 532 clinically stable subjects aged 20 to 90 years and ranging in the CVD risk spectrum from those who are healthy without risk factors to those with active CVD. CFU-A counts increased with the burden of CVD risk factors (p < 0.001). CFU-A counts were higher in subjects with symptomatic CVD than in those without (p < 0.001). During follow-up of 232 subjects with CVD, CFU-A counts were higher in those with death, myocardial infarction, or stroke than in those without (110 [70–173] vs 84 [51–136], p = 0.01). Therefore, we conclude that circulating proangiogenic cell activity, as estimated by CFU-A counts, increases with CVD risk factor burden and in the presence of established CVD. Furthermore, higher circulating proangiogenic cell activity is associated with worse clinical outcome in those with CVD