10 research outputs found

    Conservation treatment of the eye: Conformal proton reirradiation for recurrent uveal melanoma

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of a second course of proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) in patients with recurrent uveal melanoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one patients received a second course of PBRT. The mean interval between the first and the second PBRT course was 50.2 months (range, 8-165 months). Most patients (87%) received 70 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for both courses. Visual acuity was 20/200 or better in 30 patients initially and in 22 patients at the second treatment. The mean follow-up time after the second treatment was 50 months (range, 6-164 months). RESULTS: At the time of the last follow-up, 20 patients were classified as having no evidence of disease, defined as tumor regression or an absence of tumor progression. Nine eyes (29%) were enucleated because of local recurrence (n = 5) or intractable pain (n = 4). The 5-year eye retention rate was 55% (95% confidence interval: 25.2-77.4). Six of the 22 patients who retained the eye (27%) had useful vision (20/200 or better). CONCLUSIONS: A second course of PBRT for recurrent uveal melanoma to total doses between 118 and 140 CGE was associated with a relatively good probability of local control and a low enucleation rate. Although most patients lost vision, the majority were able to retain the reirradiated eye. Further evaluation is needed to assess metastasis-free survival of additional proton irradiation vs. enucleation after local recurrence

    Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and value of positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) for treatment verification after proton radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study included 9 patients with tumors in the cranial base, spine, orbit, and eye. Total doses of 1.8-3 GyE and 10 GyE (for an ocular melanoma) per fraction were delivered in 1 or 2 fields. Imaging was performed with a commercial PET/CT scanner for 30 min, starting within 20 min after treatment. The same treatment immobilization device was used during imaging for all but 2 patients. Measured PET/CT images were coregistered to the planning CT and compared with the corresponding PET expectation, obtained from CT-based Monte Carlo calculations complemented by functional information. For the ocular case, treatment position was approximately replicated, and spatial correlation was deduced from reference clips visible in both the planning radiographs and imaging CT. Here, the expected PET image was obtained from an analytical model. RESULTS: Good spatial correlation and quantitative agreement within 30% were found between the measured and expected activity. For head-and-neck patients, the beam range could be verified with an accuracy of 1-2 mm in well-coregistered bony structures. Low spine and eye sites indicated the need for better fixation and coregistration methods. An analysis of activity decay revealed as tissue-effective half-lives of 800-1,150 s. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of postradiation PET/CT for in vivo treatment verification. It also indicates some technological and methodological improvements needed for optimal clinical application

    Analysis of patient outcomes following proton radiation therapy for retinoblastoma

    No full text
    Purpose: Proton radiation therapy (PRT) is used to treat patients with retinoblastoma (RB) and has the potential to minimize exposure of normal tissue to radiation and thus decrease the risk of toxicity and second malignancies. However, comprehensive analyses of long-term patient outcomes are not available. Methods and materials: Patients with RB who were treated with PRT at our institution between 1986 and 2012 were invited to participate in a study that was designed to assess long-term outcomes. Patients who were enrolled in the study underwent a comprehensive analysis that included oncologic, ophthalmic, endocrine, cephalometric, and quality of life (QOL) assessments. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled in this study. The average length of follow-up was 12.9 years (range, 4.8-22.2 years). All study patients had bilateral disease, and the disease and visual outcomes were similar to the outcomes for all patients with RB who were treated with PRT over the same time period at our institution. An analysis of endocrine-related test results revealed no growth abnormalities or hormonal deficiencies across the cohort. Magnetic resonance imaging scans and external cephalometry showed that PRT was associated with less facial hypoplasia than enucleation. Patient and parent-proxy QOL assessments revealed that treatment for RB did not appear to severely affect long-term QOL. Conclusions: In addition to providing an opportunity for long-term disease control and functional eye preservation, PRT does not appear to be associated with unexpected late visual, endocrine, or QOL effects in this cohort of patients with RB
    corecore