4 research outputs found

    Exposure to oestrogen and risk of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery - A clue to the different leak rates in men and women

    Get PDF
    Background Colorectal anastomotic leakage is consistently more common in men, regardless of tumour location. This fact is largely unexplained but might be a consequence of biological differences including hormonal exposure and not only related to anatomy. Methods This was a retrospective, nationwide registry-based observational study of post-menopausal women operated for colorectal cancer with an anastomosis between 2007 and 2016. Hormonal exposure before surgery, as defined by prescribed drugs affecting oestrogen levels, was related to postoperative anastomotic leakage, using mixed-effects logistic regression models with adjustment for confounding. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived. In addition, separate estimates according to tumour location were computed, and a sensitivity analysis excluding topical oestrogen hormone exposure was conducted. Results Some 16,535 post-menopausal women were included, of which 16.2% were exposed to drugs increasing oestrogen levels before surgery. In this exposed group compared to the unexposed, leak rates were 3.1 and 3.8%, respectively. After adjustment, a reduction of anastomotic leakage in the exposed group was detected (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-0.99). This finding was largely attributed to the rectal cancer subgroup (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.36-0.85), while the exclusion of topical oestrogen drugs further reduced the estimates of the main analysis (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.38-1.02). Conclusions Anastomotic leakage rates are lower in women exposed to hormone replacement therapy before surgery for colorectal cancer, which might explain some of the difference in leak rates between men and women, especially regarding rectal cancer.Peer reviewe

    Exposure to oestrogen and risk of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery - A clue to the different leak rates in men and women

    Get PDF
    Background Colorectal anastomotic leakage is consistently more common in men, regardless of tumour location. This fact is largely unexplained but might be a consequence of biological differences including hormonal exposure and not only related to anatomy. Methods This was a retrospective, nationwide registry-based observational study of post-menopausal women operated for colorectal cancer with an anastomosis between 2007 and 2016. Hormonal exposure before surgery, as defined by prescribed drugs affecting oestrogen levels, was related to postoperative anastomotic leakage, using mixed-effects logistic regression models with adjustment for confounding. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived. In addition, separate estimates according to tumour location were computed, and a sensitivity analysis excluding topical oestrogen hormone exposure was conducted. Results Some 16,535 post-menopausal women were included, of which 16.2% were exposed to drugs increasing oestrogen levels before surgery. In this exposed group compared to the unexposed, leak rates were 3.1 and 3.8%, respectively. After adjustment, a reduction of anastomotic leakage in the exposed group was detected (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-0.99). This finding was largely attributed to the rectal cancer subgroup (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.36-0.85), while the exclusion of topical oestrogen drugs further reduced the estimates of the main analysis (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.38-1.02). Conclusions Anastomotic leakage rates are lower in women exposed to hormone replacement therapy before surgery for colorectal cancer, which might explain some of the difference in leak rates between men and women, especially regarding rectal cancer.Peer reviewe

    Incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis in Sweden, 2004–2015, a register-based study

    No full text
    Objectives: we aim to present an in-depth report of the incidence and prevalence of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in Sweden in a nation-wide register-based study covering the entire Swedish population Methods: each individual residing in Sweden is given a unique personal identity number. We linked the National Patient Register and the Total Population Register to identify 1) patients with prevalent SSc on 2015–12–31 and 2) patients with incident SSc during the time period 2004–2015 based on ICD-10 codes. We estimated prevalence and incidence overall and stratified on age, sex, and county. Results: we identified 1774 prevalent cases, median age was 65 years (IQR 19.2) and 84% were women. The point prevalence estimate was 22.7 per 100,000 (95%CI 13.3–32.0). 1139 individuals were newly diagnosed with SSc during 2004–2015 with a median age of 60 years (IQR 20.6) and 80% were women. The mean standardized incidence was 11.9 per 1,000,000 person-years (95%CI 5.1–18.7). The annual incidence remained stable over the study period. Women had five times higher incidence and prevalence than men. The highest prevalence stratified by age strata was observed in the group aged 70–79. Conclusion: SSc incidence and prevalence in Sweden are comparable to estimates from southern Europe, as opposed to the previous assumption of lower occurrence in northern Europe. We further observe that SSc incidence has been rather constant throughout recent years in Sweden with no obvious increase
    corecore