Make work fun again

The way corporations arrange jobs and treat people risks stifling creativity and entrepreneurship, writes Pim de Morre

Annulment Proceedings for Fraud—Sufficiency of Proof—How to Prove Refusal to Have Sexual Intercourse

De Baillet-Latour v. De Baillet-Latour, 301 N. Y. 428, 94 N. E. 2d 715 (1950)

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Isometric Time to Exhaustion of the Knee Extensors

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can increase cortical excitability of a targeted brain area, which may affect endurance exercise performance. However, optimal electrode placement for tDCS remains unclear. We tested the effect of two different tDCS electrode montages for improving exercise performance. Nine subjects underwent a control (CON), placebo (SHAM) and two different tDCS montage sessions in a randomized design. In one tDCS session, the anodal electrode was placed over the left motor cortex and the cathodal on contralateral forehead (HEAD), while for the other montage the anodal electrode was placed over the left motor cortex and cathodal electrode above the shoulder (SHOULDER). tDCS was delivered for 10min at 2.0mA, after which participants performed an isometric time to exhaustion (TTE) test of the right knee extensors. Peripheral and central neuromuscular parameters were assessed at baseline, after tDCS application and after TTE. Heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and leg muscle exercise-induced muscle pain (PAIN) were monitored during the TTE. TTE was longer and RPE lower in the SHOULDER condition (P0.05). In all conditions maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) significantly decreased after the TTE (P<0.05) while motor-evoked potential area (MEP) increased after TTE (P<0.05). These findings demonstrate that SHOULDER montage is more effective than HEAD montage to improve endurance performance, likely through avoiding the negative effects of the cathode on excitability

Preceding Race Efforts Affect Pacing and Short-Track Speed Skating Performance

Purpose: To examine whether preceding high-intensity race efforts in a competitive weekend affected pacing behaviour and performance in elite short-track speed skaters. Methods: Finishing and intermediate lap times were gathered from 500, 1000 and 1500 m Short Track Speed Skating World Cups during the seasons 2011-2016. The effect of preceding races on pacing behaviour and performance was explored using two studies. Study I: the effect of competing in extra races due to the Repechage (Rep) system, leading to an increased number of high-intensity race efforts prior to the subsequent main tournament race, was explored (500m: N=32, 1000m: N=34; 1500m: N=47). Study II: the performance of skaters over the tournament days was evaluated (500m: N=129, 1000m: N=54; 1500m: N=114). For both analytic approaches, a two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess differences in pacing and performance within the skater over the races. Results: An additional number of preceding high-intensity race efforts due to the Rep system reduced the qualification percentage in the first main tournament race for the next stage of competition in all events (500m: Direct qualification=57.3%, Rep=25.0%; 1000m: Direct=44.2%, Rep=28.3%; 1500m: Direct=27.1%, Rep=18.2%), and led to a decreased pace in the initial two laps of the 500m event. In contrast, Tournament day (Saturday vs Sunday) only affected the pacing behaviour of female skaters during the 1500m event. Conclusion: High-intensity race efforts earlier on the day affected pacing and performance of elite skaters, while the effect of high-intensity race efforts from the previous day seem to be only marginal

The role of sense of effort on self-selected cycling power output

PURPOSE: We explored the effects of the sense of effort and accompanying perceptions of peripheral discomfort on self-selected cycle power output under two different inspired O2 fractions. METHODS: On separate days, eight trained males cycled for 5 min at a constant subjective effort (sense of effort of '3' on a modified Borg CR10 scale), immediately followed by five 4-s progressive submaximal (sense of effort of "4, 5, 6, 7, and 8"; 40 s between bouts) and two 4-s maximal (sense of effort of "10"; 3 min between bouts) bouts under normoxia (NM: fraction of inspired O2 [FiO2] 0.21) and hypoxia (HY: [FiO2] 0.13). Physiological (Heart Rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and quadriceps Root Mean Square (RMS) electromyographical activity) and perceptual responses (overall peripheral discomfort, difficulty breathing and limb discomfort) were recorded. RESULTS: Power output and normalized quadriceps RMS activity were not different between conditions during any exercise bout (p > 0.05) and remained unchanged across time during the constant-effort cycling. SpO2 was lower, while heart rate and ratings of perceived difficulty breathing were higher under HY, compared to NM, at all time points (p < 0.05). During the constant-effort cycling, heart rate, overall perceived discomfort, difficulty breathing and limb discomfort increased with time (all p < 0.05). All variables (except SpO2) increased along with sense of effort during the brief progressive cycling bouts (all p < 0.05). During the two maximal cycling bouts, ratings of overall peripheral discomfort displayed an interaction between time and condition with ratings higher in the second bout under HY vs. NM conditions. CONCLUSION: During self-selected, constant-effort and brief progressive, sub-maximal, and maximal cycling bouts, mechanical work is regulated in parallel to the sense of effort, independently from peripheral sensations of discomfort