Outcome of right ventricular assist device implantation following left ventricular assist device implantation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The main aim was a systematic evaluation of the current evidence on outcomes for patients undergoing right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.; This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019130131). Reports evaluating in-hospital as well as follow-up outcome in LVAD and LVAD/RVAD implantation were identified through Ovid Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE. The primary endpoint was mortality at the hospital stay and at follow-up. Pooled incidence of defined endpoints was calculated by using random effects models.; A total of 35 retrospective studies that included 3260 patients were analyzed. 30 days mortality was in favour of isolated LVAD implantation 6.74% (1.98-11.5%) versus 31.9% (19.78-44.02%) p = 0.001 in LVAD with temporary need for RVAD. During the hospital stay the incidence of major bleeding was 18.7% (18.2-19.4%) versus 40.0% (36.3-48.8%) and stroke rate was 5.6% (5.4-5.8%) versus 20.9% (16.8-28.3%) and was in favour of isolated LVAD implantation. Mortality reported at short-term as well at long-term was 19.66% (CI 15.73-23.59%) and 33.90% (CI 8.84-59.96%) in LVAD respectively versus 45.35% (CI 35.31-55.4%) p ⩽ 0.001 and 48.23% (CI 16.01-80.45%) p = 0.686 in LVAD/RVAD group respectively.; Implantation of a temporary RVAD is allied with a worse outcome during the primary hospitalization and at follow-up. Compared to isolated LVAD support, biventricular mechanical circulatory support leads to an elevated mortality and higher incidence of adverse events such as bleeding and stroke

Preoperative Noninvasive Mapping Allowed Targeted Concomitant Surgical Ablation and Revealed COVID-19 Infection

In March 2020, a 64-year-old female with mitral valve insufficiency and persistent atrial fibrillation underwent preoperative noninvasive mapping for developing an ablation strategy. In the computed tomography (CT) scan, typical signs of COVID-19 were described. Since the consecutive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was negative, the severely symptomatic patient was planned for urgent surgery. Noninvasive mapping showed that atrial fibrillation was maintained by left atrial structures and pulmonary veins only. On admission day, the preoperative routine COVID-19 PCR test was positive, and after recovery, uneventful mitral valve repair with cryoablation of the left atrium and pulmonary veins was performed. Our case describes the potential benefit of preoperative noninvasive mapping for the development of a surgical ablation strategy, as well as the challenges in managing urgent surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding diagnostic relevance of CT

Similar 5-Year Survival in Transfemoral and Transapical TAVI Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is generally considered to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI (TF-TAVI). We aimed to compare different patient risk profiles, access-related complications, and long-term survival using inverse probability treatment weighting. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of 925 consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing TF-TAVI (n = 802) or TA-TAVI (n = 123) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as a single procedure between September 2011 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics revealed a higher perioperative risk as reflected in the EuroSCORE II (geometric mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 2.4) vs. 3.7 (CI 3.1 to 4.5); before inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) p p = 0.032). After 5 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (TF-TAVI n = 162 vs. TA-TAVI n = 45; weighted HR 1.31, (0.92 to 1.88); p = 0.138). With regard to our data, we could demonstrate, despite a higher perioperative risk, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the transapical approach for TAVI therapies. Though at higher perioperative risk, transapically treated patients suffered from less bleeding or vascular complications than transfemorally treated patients. It is of utmost interest that 5-year mortality did not differ between the groups

Similar 5-Year Survival in Transfemoral and Transapical TAVI Patients: A Single-Center Experience

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is generally considered to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI (TF-TAVI). We aimed to compare different patient risk profiles, access-related complications, and long-term survival using inverse probability treatment weighting. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of 925 consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing TF-TAVI (n = 802) or TA-TAVI (n = 123) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as a single procedure between September 2011 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics revealed a higher perioperative risk as reflected in the EuroSCORE II (geometric mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 2.4) vs. 3.7 (CI 3.1 to 4.5); before inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) p < 0.001) in the transfemoral than in the transapical group, respectively. After 30 days, TF-TAVI patients had a higher incidence of any bleeding than TA-TAVI patients (TF-TAVI n = 146 vs. TA-TAVI n = 15; weighted hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (0.29 to 0.95); p = 0.032). After 5 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (TF-TAVI n = 162 vs. TA-TAVI n = 45; weighted HR 1.31, (0.92 to 1.88); p = 0.138). With regard to our data, we could demonstrate, despite a higher perioperative risk, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the transapical approach for TAVI therapies. Though at higher perioperative risk, transapically treated patients suffered from less bleeding or vascular complications than transfemorally treated patients. It is of utmost interest that 5-year mortality did not differ between the groups

Bretschneider (Custodiol®) and St. Thomas 2 Cardioplegia Solution in Mitral Valve Repair via Anterolateral Right Thoracotomy: A Propensity-Modelled Comparison

Single-dose cardioplegia is preferred in minimal invasive mitral valve surgery to maintain the adjustment of the operative site without change of preset visualization. The aim of our study was to compare two widely used crystalloid cardioplegias Bretschneider (Custodiol®) versus St. Thomas 2 in patients who underwent mitral valve repair via small anterolateral right thoracotomy.; From May 2012 until February 2019, 184 isolated mitral valve procedures for mitral valve repair via anterolateral right thoracotomy were performed using Bretschneider (Custodiol®) cardioplegia (; n; = 123) or St. Thomas (; n; = 61). Primary efficacy endpoint was peak postoperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnT) during hospitalization. Secondary endpoints were peak creatine kinase-muscle brain type (CK-MB) and creatine kinase (CK) as well as safety outcomes. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in order to adjust for confounding by indication.; Peak hs-cTnT was higher after use of Bretschneider (Custodiol®) (geometric mean 716 mg/L, 95% confidence interval (CI) 605-847 mg/L) vs. St. Thomas 2 (561 mg/L, CI 467-674 mg/L,; p; = 0.047). Peak CK-MB (geometric mean after Bretschneider (Custodiol®): 40 ; μ; g/L, CI 35-46, St. Thomas 2: 33 ; μ; g/L, CI 27-41,; p; = 0.295) and CK (geometric mean after Bretschneider (Custodiol®): 1370 U/L, CI 1222-1536, St. Thomas 2: 1152 U/L, CI 972-1366,; p; = 0.037) showed the same pattern. We did not see any difference with respect to postoperative complications between treatment groups after IPTW.; Use of St. Thomas 2 cardioplegia was associated with lower postoperative peak levels of all cardiac markers that reflect cardiac ischemia such as hs-cTnT, CK, and CK-MB as compared to Bretschneider (Custodiol®) in propensity-weighted treatment groups

Quantifying inflammation using Interleukin-6 for improved phenotyping and risk stratification in acute heart failure

AIMS Systemic inflammation may be central in the pathophysiology of acute heart failure (AHF). We aimed to assess the possible role of systemic inflammation in the pathophysiology, phenotyping, and risk stratification of patients with AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a novel Interleukin-6 immunoassay with unprecedented sensitivity (limit of detection 0.01ng/L) we quantified systemic inflammation in unselected patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department in a multicenter study. 1-year mortality was the primary prognostic endpoint. Among 2042 patients, 1026 (50.2%) had an adjudicated diagnosis of AHF, 83.7% of whom had elevated Interleukin-6 concentrations (>4.45ng/L). Interleukin-6 was significantly higher in AHF patients compared to patients with other causes of dyspnea (11.2 [6.1-26.5] ng/L vs 9.0 [3.2-32.3] ng/L, p<0.0005). Elevated Interleukin-6 concentrations were independently predicted by increasing NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, as well as the clinical diagnosis of infection. Among the different AHF phenotypes, Interleukin-6 concentrations were highest in patients with cardiogenic shock (25.7 [14.0-164.2] ng/L) and lowest in patients with hypertensive AHF (9.3 [4.8-21.6] ng/L, p=0.001). Inflammation as quantified by Interleukin-6 was a strong and independent predictor of 1-year mortality both in all AHF patients, as well as those without clinically overt infection at presentation [adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI): 1.45 (1.15-1.83) vs 1.48 (1.09-2.00), respectively]. The addition of Interleukin-6 significantly improved the discrimination of the BIOSTAT-CHF risk score. CONCLUSION An unexpectedly high percentage of patients with AHF have subclinical systemic inflammation as quantified by Interleukin-6, which seems to contribute to AHF phenotype and to the risk of death

Non‐invasive evaluation of new‐onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a protocol for the BigMap study

Abstract Aims New‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery, occurring in 25–50% of patients. It is associated with post‐operative stroke, increased mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay, and higher treatment costs. Previous small observational studies have identified the left atrium as a source of the electrical rotors and foci maintaining NOAF, but confirmation by a large prospective clinical study is still missing. The aim of the proposed study is to investigate whether the source of NOAF lies in the left atrium. The correct identification of NOAF‐maintaining structures in cardiac surgical patients might offer potential therapeutic targets for prophylactic perioperative ablation strategies. Methods and results This is a prospective single‐centre observational study of patients developing NOAF after cardiac surgery. The primary outcome is the description of NOAF‐maintaining structures within the atria. Key secondary outcomes include overall mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital–ventilator‐free days, and proportion of persistent NOAF. In NOAF patients, the non‐invasive electrophysiological mapping will be conducted using a 252‐electrode electrocardiogram vest. After mapping, a low‐dose computed tomography scan of the chest will be performed to integrate the electrophysiological mapping results into a 3D picture of the heart. The study will include approximately 570 patients, of whom 30% (n = 170) are expected to develop NOAF. Sample size calculation revealed that 157 NOAF patients are necessary to assess the primary outcome. Patients will be tracked for a total of 5 years. Conclusions This is the largest prospective study to date describing the electrophysiological mechanisms of NOAF using non‐invasive mapping

Acute heart failure after non-cardiac surgery: incidence, phenotypes, determinants and outcomes

Aims Primary acute heart failure (AHF) is a common cause of hospitalization. AHF may also develop postoperatively (pAHF). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, phenotypes, determinants and outcomes of pAHF following non-cardiac surgery.Methods and results A total of 9164 consecutive high-risk patients undergoing 11 262 non-cardiac inpatient surgeries were prospectively included. The incidence, phenotypes, determinants and outcome of pAHF, centrally adjudicated by independent cardiologists, were determined. The incidence of pAHF was 2.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-2.8%); 51% of pAHF occurred in patients without known heart failure (de novo pAHF), and 49% in patients with chronic heart failure. Among patients with chronic heart failure, 10% developed pAHF, and among patients without a history of heart failure, 1.5% developed pAHF. Chronic heart failure, diabetes, urgent/emergent surgery, atrial fibrillation, cardiac troponin elevations above the 99th percentile, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anaemia, peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and age, were independent predictors of pAHF in the logistic regression model. Patients with pAHF had significantly higher all-cause mortality (44% vs. 11%, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and AHF readmission (15% vs. 2%, p &amp;lt; 0.001) within 1 year than patients without pAHF. After Cox regression analysis, pAHF was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.7 [95% CI 1.3-2.2]; p &amp;lt; 0.001) and AHF readmission (aHR 2.3 [95% CI 1.5-3.7]; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Findings were confirmed in an external validation cohort using a prospective multicentre cohort of 1250 patients (incidence of pAHF 2.4% [95% CI 1.6-3.3%]).Conclusions Postoperative AHF frequently developed following non-cardiac surgery, being de novo in half of cases, and associated with a very high mortality.Funding Agencies|Swiss National Science Foundation; Swiss Heart Foundation; University Hospital Basel; University of Basel; AstraZeneca; Abbott; Roche; Clinical Research Program of the University of Basel; Spezialprogramm Nachwuchsforderung Klinische Forschung; Forderung Exzellenter Junger Forschender; Forschung fond Kantonsspital Aarau; Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences; Bangerter Foundation; Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo; Brazil [FAPESP] [2015/23731-6]; Swedish Research Council [2019-02833]; South Eastern Sweden Research Council [746981, 712291]; LinkopingUniversity-Region_Osterg_otland ALF [687681, 792291]</p