Optimizing immunosuppression with mTOR inhibitors in renal transplant recipients

The aim of this thesis was to optimize immunosuppressive therapy, especially everolimus therapy in renal transplantation recipients by identifying pharmacological and pharmacogenetic risk factors influencing pharmacokinetics, and dynamics such as side effects and patient outcome. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of oral immunosuppressive agents is essential to prevent toxicity and or rejection; therefore it is very important to use a reliable and accurate bioanalytical assay. Differences between the most used analytical assays of measuring everolimus in whole blood and its effect on dosing advice were investigated. TDM is performed based on either trough or AUC monitoring and pharmacogenetics might be a valuable addition to TDM. Therefore the population pharmacokinetics of everolimus in a calcineurin free regimen was investigated and predictive factors such as pharmacogenetics were evaluated. In addition a limited sampling model was developed. MTOR inhibitors are known for a variety of side effects and high dropout rates. In this thesis a comprehensive analysis was performed aimed at identifying risk factors for discontinuation and a number of serious side effects. This thesis also describes an analysis aimed at identifying risk factor associated with delayed graft function, acute rejection and subclinical rejection in patients on a cyclosporine based immunosuppressive regimen.Nederlandse Transplantatie Vereniging de Nierstichting AZL ontwikkelingskrediet (OOK) Apotheek Afdeling Nierziekten LUMCUBL - phd migration 201

The course of A alpha Val541 as a proteinase 3 specific neo-epitope after alpha-1-antitrypsin augmentation in severe deficient patients

In alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), neutrophil serine proteases such as elastase and proteinase 3 (PR3) are insufficiently inhibited. A previous study in AATD patients showed a higher plasma level of the specific PR3-generated fibrinogen-derived peptide A alpha Val541, compared with healthy controls. Here, we analyzed the course of A alpha Val541 plasma levels during 4 weeks after a single iv dose of 240 mg/kg AAT in ten patients with genotype Z/Rare or Rare/Rare. To this end, we developed an immunoassay to measure A alpha Val541 in plasma and applied population pharmacokinetic modeling for AAT. The median A alpha Val541 plasma level before treatment was 140.2 nM (IQR 51.5-234.8 nM)). In five patients who received AAT for the first time, A alpha Val541 levels decreased to 20.6 nM (IQR 5.8-88.9 nM), and in five patients who already had received multiple infusions before, it decreased to 26.2 nM (IQR 22.31-35.0 nM). In 9 of 10 patients, A alpha Val541 levels were reduced to the median level of healthy controls (21.4 nM; IQR 16.7-30.1 nM). At 7-14 days after treatment, A alpha Val541 levels started to increase again in all patients. Our results show that fibrinopeptide A alpha Val541 may serve as a biochemical footprint to assess the efficacy of in vivo inhibition of PR3 activity in patients receiving intravenous AAT augmentation therapy.Pathogenesis and treatment of chronic pulmonary disease

Unraveling the complexity of therapeutic drug monitoring for monoclonal antibody therapies to individualize dose in oncology

Monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) have become key drugs in cancer treatment, either as targeted therapies or more recently as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The fact that only some patients benefit from these drugs poses the usual question in the field of onco-hematology: that of the benefit of individual dosing and the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to carry out this individualization. However, Mabs present unique pharmacological characteristics for TDM, and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship observed should be interpreted differently than that observed for conventional drugs and small molecules. This pharmacology practice review has been summarized from a public debate between the authors at the International TDM and Clinical Toxicology meeting in Banff, 2020, regarding the potential roles of TDM in the Mab/ICI setting.Personalised Therapeutic

Effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A combined genotypes on tamoxifen metabolism

Experimentele farmacotherapi

Effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on tamoxifen metabolism and early-breast cancer relapse

CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 might influence tamoxifen metabolism and clinical outcome. Our aim was to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 genotypes on tamoxifen concentrations and metabolic ratios (MRs) and breast cancer recurrence in a large cohort of Caucasian women. Genetic variants (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes), tamoxifen and metabolites concentrations, baseline characteristics, and breast cancer recurrence from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) were used. CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 genotypes were evaluated as alleles and as groups based on CYP2D6 genotypes (high, intermediate and low activity). Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate differences in recurrence defined as relapse-free survival (RFS). Classification tree analyses (CTAs) were conducted to assess the levels of interactions per polymorphism (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes) on endoxifen concentrations. No differences in mean concentrations and MRs were observed when comparing CYP2C19 genotypes (CYP2C19*1/*1; CYP2C19*1/*2; CYP2C19*2/*2; CYP2C19*1/*17; CYP2C19*17/*17; CYP2C19*2/*17). Only significant differences (p value<0.05) in mean concentrations and MRs were observed when comparing tamoxifen activity groups (high, intermediate and low activity). A log-rank test did not find an association across CYP2C19 genotypes (p value 0.898). CTAs showed a significant relationship between CYP2D6 and endoxifen (p value<0.0001), but no association with CYP2C19 genotypes was found. CYP2C19 polymorphisms do not have a significant impact on tamoxifen metabolism or breast cancer relapse.Personalised Therapeutic

Tacrolimus 4-hour monitoring in liver transplant patients is non-inferior to trough monitoring: The randomized controlled FK04 trial

Background After liver transplantation (LT), tacrolimus and ciclosporin treatment can lead to, partially concentration-dependent, chronic kidney disease. Monitoring ciclosporin with two-hour levels reduced overexposure and led to better renal function than trough-monitoring (C0). For tacrolimus, a 4-hour level (C4) can give a reasonable approximation of total drug exposure. We evaluated whether monitoring tacrolimus in stable patients after LT by C4 was superior to C0 regarding renal function, rejection and metabolic parameters. Methods This open label randomized controlled trial compared C4 monitoring of tacrolimus BID (Prograft) to trough (C0) monitoring in stable LT recipients. The target range for C4 of 7.8-16 ng/ml was calculated to be comparable with target C0 of 4-8 ng/ml. Primary endpoint was the effect on renal function and secondary endpoints were the occurrence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, blood pressure and metabolic parameters, during 3 months of follow-up. Results Fifty patients were randomized to C0 (n = 25) or C4 (n = 25) monitoring. There was no difference in renal function between the C0 and the C4 group (p = .98 and p = .13 for CG and MDRD at 3 months). Also, the amount of proteinuria was similar (p = .59). None of the patients suffered from graft loss or was treated for rejection. Metabolic parameters did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Tacrolimus 4-hour monitoring in stable LT patients is not superior to trough monitoring, regarding the effect on renal function, but is safe for use to facilitate tacrolimus monitoring in an afternoon outpatient clinic.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

The clinical impact of the C-0/D ratio and the CYP3A5 genotype on outcome in tacrolimus treated kidney transplant recipients

Tacrolimus is metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes. Patients expressing CYP3A5 (in Caucasian patients about 15% of the population but more frequent in African Americans and Asians) have a dose requirement that is around 50% higher than non-expressers to reach the target concentration. CYP3A5 expressers can be considered fast metabolizers. The trough concentration/dose (C-0/D) ratio of tacrolimus has recently been proposed as a prognostic marker for poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Patients with a low C-0/D ratio (also referred to as fast metabolizers) seem to have more tacrolimus-related nephrotoxicity, more BK-viremia, and a lower graft survival. At first sight, the expression of CYP3A5 and a low C-0/D ratio seem to be overlapping factors, both pointing towards patients in whom a higher tacrolimus dose is needed to reach the tacrolimus target concentration. However, there are important differences, and these differences may explain why the impact of the C-0/D ratio on long term outcome is stronger than for CYP3A5 genotype status. Patients with a low C-0/D ratio require a high tacrolimus dose and are exposed to high tacrolimus peak concentrations. The higher peak exposure to tacrolimus (and/or its metabolites) may explain the higher incidence of nephrotoxicity, BK-viremia and graft loss. A potential confounder is the concurrent maintenance treatment of corticosteroids, as steroids are sometimes continued in patients at high immunological risk. Steroids induce the metabolism of tacrolimusviapregnane X receptor mediated increased CYP3A4 expression, resulting in lower tacrolimus C-0/D ratio in high risk patients. Also non-adherence may result in lower C-0/D ratio which is also associated with poor outcome. The C-0/D ratio of tacrolimus does seem to identify a group of patients with increased risk of poor outcome after kidney transplantation. Our recommendation is to monitor tacrolimus peak concentrations in these patients, and if these are high then target slightly lower pre-dose concentrations. Another possibility would be to switch to a prolonged release formulation or to dose the drug more frequently, in smaller doses, to avoid high peak concentrations.Nephrolog

Tamoxifen pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients with non-metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundWe aimed to study the pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of tamoxifen in older women with non-metastatic breast cancer.MethodsData for this analysis were derived from the CYPTAM study (NTR1509) database. Patients were stratified by age (age groups < 65 and 65 and older). Steady-state trough concentrations were measured of tamoxifen, N-desmethyltamoxifen, 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, and endoxifen. CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 phenotypes were assessed for all patients by genotyping. Multiple linear regression models were used to analyze tamoxifen and endoxifen variability. Outcome data included recurrence-free survival at time of tamoxifen discontinuation (RFSt) and overall survival (OS).Results668 patients were included, 141 (21%) were 65 and older. Demographics and treatment duration were similar across age groups. Older patients had significantly higher concentrations of tamoxifen 129.4 ng/ml (SD 53.7) versus 112.2 ng/ml (SD 42.0) and endoxifen 12.1 ng/ml (SD 6.6) versus 10.7 ng/ml (SD 5.7, p all < 0.05), independently of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms. Age independently explained 5% of the variability of tamoxifen (b = 0.95, p < 0.001, R-2 = 0.051) and 0.1% of the variability in endoxifen concentrations (b = 0.45, p = 0.12, R-2 = 0.007). Older patients had worse RFSt (5.8 versus 7.3 years, p = 0.01) and worse OS (7.8 years versus 8.7 years, p = 0.01). This was not related to differences in endoxifen concentration (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.96-1.04, p = 0.84) or CYP polymorphisms.ConclusionSerum concentrations of tamoxifen and its demethylated metabolites are higher in older patients, independent of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms. A higher bioavailability of tamoxifen in older patients may explain the observed differences. However, clinical relevance of these findings is limited and should not lead to a different tamoxifen dose in older patients.Personalised Therapeutic

Model-informed precision dosing to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy is pivotal for sustained allograft and patient survival after renal transplantation. However, optimally balanced immunosuppressive therapy is challenged by between-patient and within-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This could warrant the application of personalised dosing strategies to optimise individual patient outcomes. Pharmacometrics, the science that investigates the xenobiotic-biotic interplay using computer-aided mathematical modelling, provides options to describe and quantify this PK variability and enables identification of patient characteristics affecting immunosuppressant PK and treatment outcomes. Here, we review and critically appraise the available pharmacometric model-informed dosing solutions for the typical immunosuppressants in modern renal transplantation, to guide their initial and subsequent dosing.Nephrolog

Development and validation of an efficient and highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for alemtuzumab quantification in human serum and plasma

Background:Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD52 glycoprotein expressed on most lymphocytes, subsequently inducing complement-mediated and antibody-mediated cytotoxicity. Owing to its ability to induce profound immune depletion, alemtuzumab is frequently used in patients before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to prevent graft rejection and acute graft-versus-host disease. In this clinical context, a stable immunoassay with high sensitivity and specificity to determine alemtuzumab levels is essential for performing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses; however, the available methods have several limitations. Here, we report the successful development and validation of an efficient and highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique based on commercially available reagents to quantify alemtuzumab in human serum or plasma.Methods:This enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique was developed and validated in accordance with the European Medicines Agency guidelines on bioanalytical method validation.Results:The assay sensitivity (lower limit of quantification) is 0.5 ng center dot mL(-1), and the dynamic range is 0.78-25 ng center dot mL(-1). To accommodate quantification of peak concentration and concentrations below the lympholytic level (<0.1 mcg center dot mL(-1)), patients' serum samples were prediluted 20-400 times according to the expected alemtuzumab concentration. The overall within-run accuracy was between 96% and 105%, whereas overall within-run precision (coefficient of variation) was between 3% and 9%. The between-run assessment provided an overall accuracy between 86% and 95% and an overall coefficient of variation between 5% and 14%.Conclusions:The developed assay provides accurate insight into alemtuzumab exposure and its effects on the clinical response to treatment, which is key to optimizing treatment strategies.Personalised Therapeutic