14 research outputs found

    Long-term prognosis of chronic cough: a prospective, observational cohort study

    No full text
    Abstract Background The long-term prognosis of chronic cough and its determinants need to be clarified. Methods This is a prospective, observational cohort study. Eighty-nine unselected subjects with chronic (> 8 weeks’ duration) cough were carefully investigated: Clinical examination, symptom questionnaire, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), skin prick tests, ambulatory peak expiratory flow monitoring, spirometry before and after 0.4 mgs of salbutamol, exhaled nitric oxide concentration measurement, hypertonic saline cough provocation test, and histamine bronchial provocation test. After five years, a letter was sent to the subjects containing questions about continuation of cough, smoking, indoor exposures, presence of co-morbidities, and current medication. It also contained LCQ and Cough Clinic diagnostic questionnaire. Sixty-eight subjects (76%) responded. Results At five years, continuing regular cough was present in 31 (46%) of the subjects and continuing impairment in cough-related quality of life (less than 1.3 points’ improvement in LCQ) in 32 (47%). Continuing regular cough was associated with presence of chronic rhinitis or esophageal reflux disease, baseline mild airway responsiveness to histamine, and baseline strong cough responsiveness to hypertonic saline. Continuing impairment in cough-related quality of life was associated with high body mass index, absence of atopy, absence of pets, and high number of background disorders (esophageal reflux disease, asthma, or chronic rhinitis). Conclusions Almost half of subjects with chronic cough suffered of the disorder at five years from initial assessment. Several possible determinants of poor prognosis could be identified

    Are risk predicting models useful for estimating survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease?

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Risk predicting models have been applied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but still not validated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The purpose of this study was to test the suitability of three prediction models as well as individual lung function and demographic factors for evaluating the prognosis of RA-ILD patients. Methods: Clinical and radiological data of 59 RA-ILD patients was re-assessed. GAP (gender, age, physiologic variables) and the modified interstitial lung disease (ILD)-GAP as well as the composite physiologic indexes (CPI) were tested for predicting mortality using the goodness-of-fit test and Cox model. Potential predictors of mortality were also sought from single lung function parameters and clinical characteristics

    Several specific high-resolution computed tomography patterns correlate with survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Evidence of honeycombing in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is a recognized risk factor for shortened survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but few studies have evaluated the feasibility of exploiting other specific patterns for predicting survival. The aim of this study was to examine the extent of specific HRCT patterns in IPF and determine whether they correlate with clinical features, pulmonary function tests (PFT), and survival. Methods: Both the presence and extent of specific HRCT patterns, such as traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, architectural distortion, reticulation, emphysema, and ground glass opacity, in 129 HRCT examinations were scored semi-quantitatively in three zones of each lung. HRCT examinations were also re-classified according to the 2011 and 2018 international statements. Correlations were calculated between the scores of specific HRCT patterns, clinical features, PFT, and patient survival. Results: The extent of traction bronchiectasis was found to be an independent risk factor of shortened survival (HR 1.227, P=0.001). Patients with a possible usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern had a better median survival than the patients with a definite UIP pattern (61 vs. 37 months, P=0.026). The extents of traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and architectural distortion displayed an inverse correlation with all PFT values at the time of diagnosis. There were few differences between the radiological classifications of the 2011 and 2018 international statements

    Are risk predicting models useful for estimating survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease?

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Risk predicting models have been applied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but still not validated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). The purpose of this study was to test the suitability of three prediction models as well as individual lung function and demographic factors for evaluating the prognosis of RA-ILD patients. Methods: Clinical and radiological data of 59 RA-ILD patients was re-assessed. GAP (gender, age, physiologic variables) and the modified interstitial lung disease (ILD)-GAP as well as the composite physiologic indexes (CPI) were tested for predicting mortality using the goodness-of-fit test and Cox model. Potential predictors of mortality were also sought from single lung function parameters and clinical characteristics. Results: The median survival was 152 and 61 months in GAP / ILD-GAP stages I and II (p = 0.017). Both GAP and ILD-GAP models accurately estimated 1-year, 2-year and 3-year mortality. CPI (p = 0.025), GAP (p = 0.008) and ILD-GAP (p = 0.028) scores, age (p = 0.002), baseline diffusion capacity to carbon monoxide (DLCO) (p = 0.014) and hospitalization due to respiratory reasons (p = 0.039), were significant predictors of mortality in the univariate analysis, whereas forced vital capacity (FVC) was not predictive. CPI score (HR 1.03, p = 0.018) and baseline DLCO (HR 0.97, p = 0.011) remained significant predictors of mortality after adjusting for age. Conclusions: GAP and ILD-GAP are applicable for evaluating the risk of death of patients with RA-ILD in a similar manner as in those with IPF. Baseline DLCO and CPI score also predicted survival

    Inflammatory myositis-associated interstitial lung disease can be distinguished from that associated with other connective tissue diseases

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Acute onset of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been described in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), but controlled studies about this issue are sparse. The aim of this study was to compare disease onset, demographics, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns in IIM-ILD and other connective tissue disease (CTD)-ILDs. Methods: Clinical and radiological data of 22 IIM-ILD and 132 other CTD-ILD patients was retrospectively gathered from hospital registries between January 2000 and November 2019. Data was re-assessed and compared using a multivariate analysis. Results: Compared to other CTD-ILDs, the patients with IIM-ILD were younger (59.7 vs. 68.0 years, P=0.023), more often non-smokers (71.4% vs. 45.7%, P=0.029) and displayed radiological nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/organizing pneumonia (NSIP/OP) overlap pattern more frequently (27.3% vs. 1.5%, P<0.001). The onset of ILD was acute with patients needing intensive care significantly more often in IIM-ILD than in other CTD-ILDs (22.7% vs. 2.3%, P<0.001). In most patients ILD was diagnosed before or simultaneously with IIM presentation unlike in other CTD-ILDs (90.9% vs. 47.7%, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, NSIP/OP overlap pattern, acute onset disease treated in intensive care unit and ILD preceding or being diagnosed simultaneously with CTD were significantly associated with IIM-ILD. The multivariate model, supplemented with age, had excellent diagnostic performance identifying IIM-ILD [area under curve (AUC) 0.845]. Conclusions: Unlike other CTD-ILDs, IIM-ILD often develops acutely, simultaneously with the systemic disease. Therefore, clinicians should consider IIM-ILD as an option of differential diagnosis in patients with acute ILD and promptly test muscle enzymes as well as comprehensive autoantibody tests
    corecore