4 research outputs found
Drama, Performance Ethnography, and Self-Esteem
Self-esteem affects learning, performance, self-worth, and quality
of life, particularly in persons with dyslexia, or rather how students with dyslexia are
mis/understood and supported. Dyslexia does not only affect literacy but also affects
emotional well-being. Webb concludes that for children to feel successful, they need to
become aware of their unique learning strengths to apply them effectively to strengthen
weaknesses. Drama and Performance Ethnography (PE) can be support strategies. Workshops
were carried out with a group of adolescent youngsters with dyslexia. The aim was to
provide a safe environment where they could find their voice and gain self-confidence
through drama and PE to provide opportunities to address self-esteem and to provide
insights for policies and practice. This article intends to listen to these youngsters’,
also co-authors, and their parents’ narratives of this experience
Recommended from our members
Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis
ObjectiveTo compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days.Summary background dataThe Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes.MethodsWe focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations.ResultsThe pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret.ConclusionsOverall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785