Influence of Stem Cell Source on Outcomes of Allogeneic Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Therapy Transplants Using Haploidentical Related Donors

AbstractWe compared outcomes for 2 retrospective cohorts of patients undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) therapy transplants using haploidentical related donors and post-transplant prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with high-dose cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. The first cohort of 13 was transplanted with bone marrow (BM) as the stem cell source, whereas the second cohort of 23 used peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The BM cohort received a single 60-mg/kg dose of cyclophosphamide on day +3, whereas the PBSC cohort received 2 doses on days +3 and +4. Patients in the first cohort were slightly older and had a higher proportion of acute myeloid leukemia, but there were no differences in the distribution of Disease Risk Index scores between the 2 groups. Patients in the PBSC group received double the number of CD34+ cells in the stem cell graft. Times to neutrophil and platelet recovery were not different between the 2 groups. Three patients, all in the PBSC group, failed to engraft but recovered with autologous hemopoiesis and survived. The 6-month cumulative incidences of acute GVHD were 55.1% for BM and 48.5% for PBSCs (P = .651), whereas 24-month cumulative rates for chronic GHVD were 28.6% for BM and 32.3% for PBSCs (P = .685). Only 2 patients, both in the BM group, died of nonrelapse causes, both of second cancers. The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 43.9% for BM and 23.5% for PBSCs (P = .286). Overall survival at 2 years was significantly better for PBSC patients (P = .028), at 83.4% versus 52.7% for BM. Relapse-free and event-free survival did not differ significantly between BM and PBSC groups. In this retrospective analysis, we conclude that the use of PBSCs for haploidentical RIC transplants is a feasible strategy, with equivalent rates of acute and chronic GVHD and risk of relapse and low nonrelapse mortality compared with BM

Long-term outcomes of corticosteroid graft versus host disease prophylaxis in peripheral blood allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant: A comparative cohort analysis

Background: Corticosteroids (CSs) have previously been incorporated into graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens for bone marrow (BM) and haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Aims: To assess the impact of prophylactic CS in HSCT using peripheral blood (PB) stem cells. Methods: Patients were identified from three HSCT centres receiving a first PB-HSCT between January 2011 and December 2015 from a fully human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor for acute myeloid leukaemia or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. To enable meaningful comparison, patients were divided into two cohorts. Results: Cohort 1 included only myeloablative-matched sibling HSCT, where the only variation in GVHD prophylaxis was the addition of CS. In these 48 patients, there were no differences in GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, overall survival or GVHDrelapse-free-survival (GRFS) at 4 years after transplant. Cohort 2 included the remaining HSCT recipients, where one group received CS-prophylaxis and the non-CS group received an antimetabolite, ciclosporin and anti-T-lymphocyte globulin. In these 147 patients, those receiving CS-prophylaxis experienced higher rates of chronic GVHD (71% vs 18.1%, P \u3c 0.001) and lower rates of relapse (14.9% vs 33.9%, P = 0.02). Those receiving CS-prophylaxis had a lower 4-year GRFS (15.7% vs 40.3%, P = 0.002). Conclusions: There does not appear to be a role for adding CS to standard GVHD prophylaxis regimens in PB-HSCT

Lectures on art,

Preface signed: J.H.M.I. Poole, R.S. The Egyptian tomb and the future state.--II. Richmond, W.B. Monumental painting.--III. Poynter, E.J. Some remarks on ancient decorative art.--IV. Micklethwaite, J.T. English parish churches.--V. Morris, W. The history of pattern designing.--VI. Morris, W. The lesser arts of life.Mode of access: Internet

Allogeneic virus-specific T cells with HLA alloreactivity do not produce GVHD in human subjects

Adoptive transfer of viral antigen-specific memory T cells can reconstitute antiviral immunity, but in a recent report a majority of virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) lines showed in vitro cross-reactivity against allo-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules as measured by interferon-γ secretion. We therefore reviewed our clinical experience with adoptive transfer of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation donor-derived virus-specific CTLs in 153 recipients, including 73 instances where there was an HLA mismatch. There was no de novo acute graft-versus-host disease after infusion, and incidence of graft-versus-host disease reactivation was low and not significantly different in recipients of matched or mismatched CTL. However, we found that virus-specific T cell lines recognized up to 10% of a panel of 44 HLA disparate targets, indicating that virus-specific T cells can have cross-reactivity with HLA-mismatched targets in vitro. These data indicate that the adoptive transfer of partially HLA-mismatched virus-specific CTL is safe despite in vitro recognition of recipient HLA molecules

Graft versus leukemia response without graft versus host disease elicited by adoptively transferred multivirus-specific T-cells

A 12-year-old boy with refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia received a haploidentical transplant from his mother. As prophylaxis for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus, he received ex vivo expanded virus-specific donor T cells 3.5 months after transplant. Four weeks later leukemic blasts bearing the E2A deletion, identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), appeared transiently in the blood followed by a FISH-negative hematological remission, which was sustained until a testicular relapse 3.5 months later. Clearance of the circulating leukemic cells coincided with a marked increase in circulating virus-specific T cells. The virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) line showed strong polyfunctional reactivity with the patient's leukemic cells but not phytohemagglutinin (PHA) blasts, suggesting that virus-specific CTL lines may have clinically significant antileukemia activity