19 research outputs found
Pairing of Homologous Regions in the Mouse Genome Is Associated with Transcription but Not Imprinting Status
This work was funded by the BBSRC, grant BB/H088071/1 (www.bbsrc.ac.uk), MRC, grant G0700760 (www.mrc.ac.uk), Wellcome Trust, grant 095645/Z/11/Z (www.wellcome.ac.uk) and the EU through EpiGeneSys (www.epigenesys.eu) and Blueprint (www.blueprint-epigenome.eu). C.K. was funded by the DFG, personal fellowship KR 3317/2-1 (www.dfg.de) and CTR, personal short term fellowship (www.trophoblast.cam.ac.uk). M.J.H. received funding through grant NCI/NIH 2RO1 CA089426 (www.nih.gov)
A rapid review of home-based activities that can promote mental wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health measures such as isolation, quarantine, and
social distancing are needed. Some of these measures can adversely affect mental health.
Activities that can be performed at home may mitigate these consequences and improve
overall mental well-being. In this study, home-based activities that have potential beneficial
effects on mental health were examined.
Methods
A rapid review was conducted based on a search of the following databases: MEDLINE,
EMBASE, CINAHL, PyscINFO, Global Health, epistemonikos.org, covid19reviews.org,
and eppi.ioe.ac.uk/covid19_map_v13.html. Eligible studies include randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies published between 1/1/2000 and 28/05/2020
and that examined the impact of various activities on mental health outcomes in lowresource settings and contexts that lead to social isolation. Studies of activities that
require mental health professionals or that could not be done at home were excluded.
Two review authors performed title/abstract screening. At the full-text review stage, 25%
of the potentially eligible studies were reviewed in full by two review authors; the rest were
reviewed by one review author. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were performed by one review author and checked by a second review author. The main outcome
assessed was change or differences in mental health as expressed in Cohen’s d; analysis
was conducted following the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines (SWiM). PROSPERO registration: CRD42020186082. Results
Of 1,236 unique records identified, 160 were reviewed in full, resulting in 16 included studies.
The included studies reported on the beneficial effects of exercise, yoga, progressive muscle
relaxation, and listening to relaxing music. One study reported on the association between solitary religious activities and post traumatic stress disorder symptoms. While most of the included
studies examined activities in group settings, particularly among individuals in prisons, the activities were described as something that can be performed at home and alone. All included studies were assessed to be at risk of bias in one or more of the bias domains examined.
Conclusions
There is some evidence that certain home-based activities can promote mental wellness
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Guidelines are needed to help optimize benefits while minimizing potential risks when performing these activities.Library, UBCMedicine, Faculty ofFamily Practice, Department ofPopulation and Public Health (SPPH), School ofPsychiatry, Department ofReviewedFacultyResearcherGraduateOthe
Post-discharge management following hip fracture - get you back to B4: A parallel group, randomized controlled trial study protocol
Abstract Background Fall-related hip fractures result in significant personal and societal consequences; importantly, up to half of older adults with hip fracture never regain their previous level of mobility. Strategies of follow-up care for older adults after fracture have improved investigation for osteoporosis; but managing bone health alone is not enough. Prevention of fractures requires management of both bone health and falls risk factors (including the contributing role of cognition, balance and continence) to improve outcomes. Methods/Design This is a parallel group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a post-fracture clinic compared with usual care on mobility for older adults following their hospitalization for hip fracture. Participants randomized to the intervention will attend a fracture follow-up clinic where a geriatrician and physiotherapist will assess and manage their mobility and other health issues. Depending on needs identified at the clinical assessment, participants may receive individualized and group-based outpatient physiotherapy, and a home exercise program. Our primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of a novel post-discharge fracture management strategy on the mobility of older adults after hip fracture. We will enrol 130 older adults (65 years+) who have sustained a hip fracture in the previous three months, and were admitted to hospital from home and are expected to be discharged home. We will exclude older adults who prior to the fracture were: unable to walk 10 meters; diagnosed with dementia and/or significant comorbidities that would preclude their participation in the clinical service. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the Intervention or Usual Care groups by remote allocation. Treatment allocation will be concealed; investigators, measurement team and primary data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Our primary outcome is mobility, operationalized as the Short Physical Performance Battery at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include frailty, rehospitalizations, falls risk factors, quality of life, as well as physical activity and sedentary behaviour. We will conduct an economic evaluation to determine health related costs in the first year, and a process evaluation to ascertain the acceptance of the program by older adults, as well as clinicians and staff within the clinic. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01254942</p
Post-discharge management following hip fracture - get you back to B4: A parallel group, randomized controlled trial study protocol
Background:
Fall-related hip fractures result in significant personal and societal consequences; importantly, up to half of older adults with hip fracture never regain their previous level of mobility. Strategies of follow-up care for older adults after fracture have improved investigation for osteoporosis; but managing bone health alone is not enough. Prevention of fractures requires management of both bone health and falls risk factors (including the contributing role of cognition, balance and continence) to improve outcomes.
Methods/Design
This is a parallel group, pragmatic randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a post-fracture clinic compared with usual care on mobility for older adults following their hospitalization for hip fracture. Participants randomized to the intervention will attend a fracture follow-up clinic where a geriatrician and physiotherapist will assess and manage their mobility and other health issues. Depending on needs identified at the clinical assessment, participants may receive individualized and group-based outpatient physiotherapy, and a home exercise program. Our primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of a novel post-discharge fracture management strategy on the mobility of older adults after hip fracture.
We will enrol 130 older adults (65 years+) who have sustained a hip fracture in the previous three months, and were admitted to hospital from home and are expected to be discharged home. We will exclude older adults who prior to the fracture were: unable to walk 10 meters; diagnosed with dementia and/or significant comorbidities that would preclude their participation in the clinical service.
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to the Intervention or Usual Care groups by remote allocation. Treatment allocation will be concealed; investigators, measurement team and primary data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Our primary outcome is mobility, operationalized as the Short Physical Performance Battery at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include frailty, rehospitalizations, falls risk factors, quality of life, as well as physical activity and sedentary behaviour. We will conduct an economic evaluation to determine health related costs in the first year, and a process evaluation to ascertain the acceptance of the program by older adults, as well as clinicians and staff within the clinic.
Trial registration number
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01254942Family Practice, Department ofMedicine, Department ofOrthopaedics, Department ofPopulation and Public Health (SPPH), School ofOther UBCNon UBCMedicine, Faculty ofReviewedFacult