Morphology and function of dog arterial grafts preserved in UW-solution

Objectives:To assess the function of arterial grafts after prolonged preservation in the University of Wisconsin solution (UW), in vitro and in vivo.Methods:Carotid arteries were harvested from dogs and stored for 1–21 days at 4°C in UW (n = 10) or in PBS (0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4), (PBS) (n = 10). Slices were examined by lightmicroscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For viability testing, specimens were connected to an isometric force transducer (2 × n = 9). Contractile and relaxation responses were examined by adding phenylephrine (200μM) and metacholine (200μM), respectively. For in vivo studies (n = 41), 2.5cm carotid artery segments were implanted orthotopically, as autografts and allografts, after 14 days of storage in UW or in PBS. Autologous veins were used as controls. After 28 days or 56 days, arteriography was performed and the grafts were excised for LM and SEM.Results:The arterial endothelial layer remained intact after up to 14 days of storage in UW. In PBS, the endothelium was lost after 3 days. The functional response after 14 days storage in UW was approximately 50% vs. 0% after 14 days in PBS. In the autografts, total patencies (28 days + 56 days) were 100% (8/8) and 63% (5/8) for UW and PBS stored grafts, respectively. In the allografts, the UW and PBS preserved grafts showed total patencies of 86% (12/14) and 83% (5/6), respectively. Microscopically, the allografts showed fibrotic degeneration.Conclusions:Arteries are well preserved in UW up to 14 days of storage. Arterial autografts preserved in UW showed good patency and better integrity of the vessel wall after implantation, than grafts stored in PBS or allografts (without immunosuppressive therapy)

Microcirculatory investigations to determine the effect of spinal cord stimulation for critical leg ischemia: the Dutch multicenter randomized controlled trial

Patients with non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia generally undergo medical treatment only to prevent or postpone amputation. There is some evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) stimulates ischemic wound healing. Thus, this could benefit limb survival through improved skin perfusion. We investigated the effect of SCS versus conservative treatment on skin microcirculation in relation to treatment outcome in patients with non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia. Standard medical treatment plus SCS was compared with only standard medical treatment in a multicenter randomized controlled trial comprised of 120 patients with surgically non-reconstructable chronic rest pain or ulceration. We investigated skin microcirculation by means of capillary microscopy, laser Doppler perfusion, and transcutaneous oxygen measurements in the foot. The microcirculatory status just before treatment was classified in three categories (poor, intermediate, and good) and was related to limb survival after a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. Clinical parameters, peripheral blood pressures, and limb survival rates showed no significant differences between the SCS and standard groups during the follow-up period. In both treatment groups, amputation frequency after 18 months was high in patients with an initially poor microcirculatory skin perfusion (SCS 80% vs standard treatment 71%; NS) and low in those with a good skin perfusion (29% vs 11 %, respectively; NS). In patients with an intermediate skin microcirculation amputation, frequency was twice as low in patients additionally treated with SCS as in the standard treatment group (48% vs 24%; P =.08). In these patients, microcirculatory reactive hyperemia during the follow-up period reduced in the standard group but not in the SCS group (P <.01). Selection on the basis of the initial microcirculatory skin perfusion identifies patients in whom SCS can improve local skin perfusion and limb surviva