Gun Ownership and Firearm-related Deaths

BACKGROUND: A variety of claims about possible associations between gun ownership rates, mental illness burden, and the risk of fi rearm-related deaths have been put forward. However, systematic data on this issue among various countries remain scant. Our objective was to assess whether the popular notion "guns make a nation safer" has any merits.METHODS: Data on gun ownership were obtained from the Small Arms Survey, and for fi rearm-related deaths from a European detailed mortality database (World Health Organization), the National Center for Health Statistics, and others. Crime rate was used as an indicator of safety of the nation and was obtained from the United Nations Surveys of Crime Trends. Age-standardized disability-adjusted life- year rates due to major depressive disorder per 100,000 inhabitants with data obtained from the World Health Organization database were used as a putative indicator for mental illness burden in a given country.RESULTS: Among the 27 developed countries, there was a significant positive correlation between guns per capita per country and the rate of fi rearm-related deaths ( r ¼ 0.80; P < .0001). In addition, there was a positive correlation (r ¼ 0.52; P ¼ .005) between mental illness burden in a country and fi rearm-related deaths. However, there was no significant correlation (P ¼ .10) between guns per capita per country and crime rate ( r ¼ .33), or between mental illness and crime rate ( r ¼ 0.32; P ¼ .11). In a linear regression model with fi rearm-related deaths as the dependent variable with gun ownership and mental illness as independent covariates, gun ownership was a significant predictor ( P < .0001) of fi rearm-related deaths, whereas mental illness was of borderline significance ( P ¼ .05) only.CONCLUSION: The number of guns per capita per country was a strong and independent predictor of fi rearm-related death in a given country, whereas the predictive power of the mental illness burden was of borderline significance in a multivariable model. Regardless of exact cause and effect, however, the current study debunks the widely quoted hypothesis that guns make a nation safer

Secondary arterial hypertension: when, who, and how to screen?

Secondary hypertension refers to arterial hypertension due to an identifiable cause and affects ∼5-10% of the general hypertensive population. Because secondary forms are rare and work up is time-consuming and expensive, only patients with clinical suspicion should be screened. In recent years, some new aspects gained importance regarding this screening. In particular, increasing evidence suggests that 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring plays a central role in the work up of patients with suspected secondary hypertension. Moreover, obstructive sleep apnoea has been identified as one of the most frequent causes. Finally, the introduction of catheter-based renal denervation for the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension has dramatically increased the interest and the number of patients evaluated for renal artery stenosis. We review the clinical clues of the most common causes of secondary hypertension. Specific recommendations are given as to evaluation and treatment of various forms of secondary hypertension. Despite appropriate therapy or even removal of the secondary cause, BP rarely ever returns to normal with long-term follow-up. Such residue hypertension indicates either that some patients with secondary hypertension also have concomitant essential hypertension or that irreversible vascular remodelling has taken place. Thus, in patients with potentially reversible causes of hypertension, early detection and treatment are important to minimize/prevent irreversible changes in the vasculature and target organ

Resistant hypertension: what the cardiologist needs to know

Treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH) affects between 3 and 30% of hypertensive patients, and its presence is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Until recently, the interest on these patients has been limited, because providing care for them is difficult and often frustrating. However, the arrival of new treatment options [i.e. catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) and baroreceptor stimulation] has revitalized the interest in this topic. The very promising results of the initial uncontrolled studies on the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of RDN in TRH seemed to suggest that this intervention might represent an easy solution for a complex problem. However, subsequently, data from controlled studies have tempered the enthusiasm of the medical community (and the industry). Conversely, these new studies emphasized some seminal aspects on this topic: (i) the key role of 24 h ambulatory BP and arterial stiffness measurement to identify ‘true' resistant patients; (ii) the high prevalence of secondary hypertension among this population; and (iii) the difficulty to identify those patients who may profit from device-based interventions. Accordingly, for those patients with documented TRH, the guidelines suggest to refer them to a hypertension specialist/centre in order to perform adequate work-up and treatment strategies. The aim of this review is to provide guidance for the cardiologist on how to identify patients with TRH and elucidate the prevailing underlying pathophysiological mechanism(s), to define a strategy for the identification of patients with TRH who may benefit from device-based interventions and discuss results and limitations of these interventions, and finally to briefly summarize the different drug-based treatment strategie

Renal involvement follows cardiac enlargement in essential hypertension

To assess the relationship between early clinically detectable involvement of hypertensive vascular disease in heart and kidneys, we obtained systemic and renal hemodynamic and M-mode echocardiographic measurements in 65 patients with essential hypertension. The results indicate that patients with and without left ventricular hypertrophy had similar renal hemodynamic findings. In contrast, patients with altered renal hemodynamic measurements (ie, reduced renal distribution of cardiac output and, therefore, absolute renal blood flow with increased renal vascular resistance) and increased serum uric acid levels also had increased left ventricular posterior and septal wall thicknesses and mass index. Moreover, these data also demonstrated that in patients with altered renal hemodynamics, the lower the renal distribution of cardiac output and the higher the serum uric acid levels, the greater were the indexes of cardiac enlargement. These results demonstrated that the pathophysiological and hemodynamic effects of essential hypertension in the heart precede those in the kidneys

Role of neprilysin inhibitor combinations in hypertension: insights from hypertension and heart failure trials

Neprilysin is a neutral endopeptidase and its inhibition increases bioavailability of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and substance P, resulting in natriuretic, vasodilatatory, and anti-proliferative effects. In concert, these effects are prone to produce a powerful ventricular unloading and antihypertensive response. LCZ696 (Valsartan/sacubitril) is a first-in-class angiotensin II-receptor neprilysin inhibitor. LCZ696 is a novel drug not only for the treatment of heart failure but it is also likely to be a useful antihypertensive drug and may have a preferential effect on systolic pressure. This review discusses (i) the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of this novel drug, (ii) the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LCZ696 in treatment of hypertension from the available trials, (iii) evidence from other contemporary trials on combined Neprilysin inhibitors, (iv) future trials and areas of research to identify hypertensive patient populations that would most benefit from LCZ69

Overweight and sudden death increased ventricular ectopy in cardiopathy of obesity

besity has been documented to be an independent risk factor for sudden death and other cardiovascular mortality. The present study was designed to monitor and quantify cardiac arrhythmias in obese subjects with and without eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy, who were matched with regard to arterial pressure, age, sex, and height with lean subjects. Prevalence of premature ventricular (but not atrial) contractions was 30 times higher in obese patients with eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy compared with lean subjects. Similarly, obese patients with left ventricular hypertrophy scored higher with regard to the classification of Lown and Wolf than those without left ventricular hypertrophy and lean subjects having the same level of arterial pressure. Patients' class in the Lown and Wolf system correlated with ventricular diastolic diameter and left ventricular mass. Thus, heart enlargement of the eccentric type as a consequence of obesity predisposes to excessive ventricular ectopy. Echocardiographic assessment and electrocardiographic monitoring allow us to identify the patients who are at highest risk of more serious arrhythmias or possibly sudden death and to subject them to the most specific preventive and therapeutic measures