Assessment of levels of exposure to biogenic amines - a Gambia case study

Biogenic amines (BAs) have been reported in a variety of foods namely, fish, milk, yogurt, beef and chicken. Their amounts are usually increased during controlled or spontaneous microbial fermentation of food or in the course of food spoilage. Biogenic amines are basic nitrogenous compounds with important metabolic and physiological significance in living organisms. They also pose some hazards to human health when consumed in quantities beyond their legal limits. Protein containing foods are the main precursors from which BAs are synthesized. A lot of amino acid containing foods are being consumed in The Gambia with no equipped laboratory to assess the levels of BAs. This work involved the study of the factors which enhance the formation of BAs through use of questionnaires, observation and testing (temperature). This research aimed at assessing the level of exposure to biogenic amine contamination by consumers in The Gambia. It was found that the level of biogenic amines may not be beyond their toxic levels in fish, milk and yogurt, but there is a probability of it being high in meat due to lack of proper means of preservation and quiet higher in imported chickens because of the duration of time it takes to get it to final consumers

Titrimetric analysis of commercial bleach: a Gambia case study

Ten brands of bleach were analyzed for their sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) levels using titrimetric method. The levels of NaOCl found in the bleach samples were generally higher than the levels indicated on the respective labels. Only one out of the ten samples had a NaOCl level of below 5% indicating that it is a safe and noncorrosive household bleach

Development of a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model for intranasal administration of midazolam in older adults:a single-site two-period crossover study

BACKGROUND: Intranasal midazolam can produce procedural sedation in frail older patients with dementia who are unable to tolerate necessary medical or dental procedures during domiciliary medical care. Little is known about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal midazolam in older (&gt;65 yr old) people. The aim of this study was to understand the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of intranasal midazolam in older people with the primary goal of developing a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to facilitate safer domiciliary sedation care.METHODS: We recruited 12 volunteers: ASA physical status 1-2, aged 65-80 yr, and received midazolam 5 mg intravenously and 5 mg intranasally on two study days separated by a 6 day washout period. Concentrations of venous midazolam and 1'-OH-midazolam, Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score, bispectral index (BIS), arterial pressure, ECG, and respiratory parameters were measured for 10 h.RESULTS: Time to peak effect of intranasal midazolam for BIS, MAP, and SpO 2 were 31.9 (6.2), 41.0 (7.6), and 23.1 (3.0) min, respectively. Intranasal bioavailability was lower compared with intravenous administration (F abs 95%; 95% confidence interval: 89-100%). A three-compartment model best described midazolam pharmacokinetics following intranasal administration. A separate effect compartment linked to the dose compartment best described an observed time-varying drug-effect difference between intranasal and intravenous midazolam, suggesting direct nose-to-brain transport. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal bioavailability was high and sedation onset was rapid, with maximum sedative effects after 32 min. We developed a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for intranasal midazolam for older persons and an online tool to simulate changes in MOAA/S, BIS, MAP, and SpO 2 after single and additional intranasal boluses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT (2019-004806-90).</p

Intranasal dexmedetomidine in elderly subjects with or without beta blockade:a randomised double-blind single-ascending-dose cohort study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose study was to determine the safety and tolerability of intranasal dexmedetomidine in the elderly.; METHODS: We randomly assigned 48 surgical patients ≥ ¥65 yr of age to receive single intranasal doses of dexmedetomidine or placebo (5:1 ratio) in four sequential dose cohorts: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mug kg-1. Each dose cohort comprised two groups of six subjects: a group of subjects using beta-blockers and a group not taking beta-blockers. Vital signs and sedation depth (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation [MOAA/S] and bispectral index) were measured for 2 h after administration. Blood samples were taken to determine dexmedetomidine plasma concentrations.; RESULTS: One subject (1.0 mug kg-1) had acute hypotension requiring ephedrine. Systolic arterial BP decreased >30% in 15 of 40 subjects (37.5%) receiving dexmedetomidine, lasting longer than 5 min in 11 subjects (27.5%). The MAP decreased >30% (>5 min) in 10%, 20%, 50%, and 30% of subjects receiving dexmedetomidine 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mug kg-1, respectively, irrespective of beta-blocker use. HR decreased 10-26%. MOAA/S score ≤ 3 occurred in 18 (45%) subjects; eight (20%) subjects receiving dexmedetomidine showed no signs of sedation. Tmax was 70 min. Cmax was between 0.15 ng ml-1 (0.5 mug kg-1) and 0.46 ng ml-1 (2.0 mug kg-1).; CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine in elderly subjects had a sedative effect, but caused a high incidence of profound and sustained hypotension irrespective of beta-blocker use. The technique is unsuitable for routine clinical use.; CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5513 (The Netherlands Trial Registry 5513)

Multi-risk governance for natural hazards in Naples and Guadeloupe

Technical and institutional capacities are strongly related and must be jointly developed to guarantee effective natural risk governance. Indeed, the available technical solutions and decision support tools influence the development of institutional frameworks and disaster policies. This paper analyses technical and institutional capacities, by providing a comparative evaluation of governance systems in Italy and France. The focus is on two case studies: Naples and Guadeloupe. Both areas are exposed to multiple hazards, including earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, floods, tsunamis, fires, cyclones, and marine inundations Cascade and conjoint effects such as seismic swarms triggered by volcanic activity have also been taken into account. The research design is based on a documentary analysis of laws and policy documents informed by semi-structured interviews and focus groups with stakeholders at the local level. This leads to the identification of three sets of governance characteristics that cover the key issues of: (1) stakeholders and governance level; (2) decision support tools and mitigation measures; and (3) stakeholder cooperation and communication. The results provide an overview of the similarities and differences as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the governance systems across risks. Both case studies have developed adequate decision support tools for most of the hazards of concern. Warning systems, and the assessment of hazards and exposure are the main strengths. While technical/scientific capacities are very well developed, the main weaknesses involve the interagency communication and cooperation, and the use and dissemination of scientific knowledge when developing policies and practices. The consequences for multi-risk governance are outlined in the discussion

Conducting clinical research in a resource-constrained setting: lessons from a longitudinal cohort study in The Gambia.

Clinical research conducted to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards is increasingly being undertaken in resource-constrained low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) settings. This presents unique challenges that differ from those faced in high-income country (HIC) contexts, due to a dearth of infrastructure and unique socio-cultural contexts. Field experiences by research teams working in these LMIC contexts are thus critical to advancing knowledge on successful research conduct in these settings. The Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has operated in The Gambia, a resource-constrained LMIC for over 70 years and has developed numerous research support platforms and systems. The unit was the lead clinical collaborator in a recently completed Expanded Program on Immunization Consortium (EPIC) study, involving a multicountry collaboration across five countries including the USA, Canada, Belgium, Papua New Guinea and The Gambia. The EPIC study recruited and completed follow-up of 720 newborn infants over 2 years. In this paper, we provide in-depth field experience covering challenges faced by the Gambian EPIC team in the conduct of this study. We also detail some reflections on these challenges. Our findings are relevant to the international research community as they highlight practical day-to-day challenges in conducting GCP standard clinical research in resource-constrained LMIC contexts. They also provide insights on how study processes can be adapted early during research planning to mitigate challenges

Study protocol for a phase 1/2, single-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a measles and rubella vaccine delivered by a microneedle patch in healthy adults (18 to 40 years), measles and rubella vaccine-primed toddlers (15 to 18 months) and measles and rubella vaccine-naïve infants (9 to 10 months) in The Gambia [Measles and Rubella Vaccine Microneedle Patch Phase 1/2 Age De-escalation Trial].

BACKGROUND: New strategies to increase measles and rubella vaccine coverage, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, are needed if elimination goals are to be achieved. With this regard, measles and rubella vaccine microneedle patches (MRV-MNP), in which the vaccine is embedded in dissolving microneedles, offer several potential advantages over subcutaneous delivery. These include ease of administration, increased thermostability, an absence of sharps waste, reduced overall costs and pain-free administration. This trial will provide the first clinical trial data on MRV-MNP use and the first clinical vaccine trial of MNP technology in children and infants. METHODS: This is a phase 1/2, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, age de-escalation trial. Based on the defined eligibility criteria for the trial, including screening laboratory investigations, 45 adults [18-40 years] followed by 120 toddlers [15-18 months] and 120 infants [9-10 months] will be enrolled in series. To allow double-blinding, participants will receive either the MRV-MNP and a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) subcutaneous (SC) injection or a placebo MNP and the MRV by SC injection (MRV-SC). Local and systemic adverse event data will be collected for 14 days following study product administration. Safety laboratories will be repeated on day 7 and, in the adult cohort alone, on day 14. Unsolicited adverse events including serious adverse events will be collected until the final study visit for each participant on day 180. Measles and rubella serum neutralizing antibodies will be measured at baseline, on day 42 and on day 180. Cohort progression will be dependent on review of the unblinded safety data by an independent data monitoring committee. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide the first clinical data on the use of a MNP to deliver the MRV and the first data on the use of MNPs in a paediatric population. It will guide future product development decisions for what may be a key technology for future measles and rubella elimination. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry 202008836432905 . CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04394689

A measles and rubella vaccine microneedle patch in The Gambia: a phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: Microneedle patches (MNPs) have been ranked as the highest global priority innovation for overcoming immunisation barriers in low-income and middle-income countries. This trial aimed to provide the first data on the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of a measles and rubella vaccine (MRV)-MNP in children. METHODS: This single-centre, phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial was conducted in The Gambia. To be eligible, all participants had to be healthy according to prespecified criteria, aged 18-40 years for the adult cohort, 15-18 months for toddlers, or 9-10 months for infants, and to be available for visits throughout the follow-up period. The three age cohorts were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio (adults) or 1:1 ratio (toddlers and infants) to receive either an MRV-MNP (Micron Biomedical, Atlanta, GA, USA) and a placebo (0·9% sodium chloride) subcutaneous injection, or a placebo-MNP and an MRV subcutaneous injection (MRV-SC; Serum Institute of India, Pune, India). Unmasked staff ransomly assigned the participants using an online application, and they prepared visually identical preparations of the MRV-MNP or placebo-MNP and MRV-SC or placebo-SC, but were not involved in collecting endpoint data. Staff administering the study interventions, participants, parents, and study staff assessing trial endpoints were masked to treatment allocation. The safety population consists of all vaccinated participants, and analysis was conducted according to route of MRV administration, irrespective of subsequent protocol deviations. The immunogenicity population consisted of all vaccinated participants who had a baseline and day 42 visit result available, and who had no protocol deviations considered to substantially affect the immunogenicity endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were collected for 14 days following vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events were collected to day 180. Age de-escalation between cohorts was based on the review of the safety data to day 14 by an independent data monitoring committee. Serum neutralising antibodies to measles and rubella were measured at baseline, day 42, and day 180. Analysis was descriptive and included safety events, seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean antibody concentrations. The trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202008836432905, and is complete. FINDINGS: Recruitment took place between May 18, 2021, and May 27, 2022. 45 adults, 120 toddlers, and 120 infants were randomly allocated and vaccinated. There were no safety concerns in the first 14 days following vaccination in either adults or toddlers, and age de-escalation proceeded accordingly. In infants, 93% (52/56; 95% CI 83·0-97·2) seroconverted to measles and 100% (58/58; 93·8-100) seroconverted to rubella following MRV-MNP administration, while 90% (52/58; 79·2-95·2) and 100% (59/59; 93·9-100) seroconverted to measles and rubella respectively, following MRV-SC. Induration at the MRV-MNP application site was the most frequent local reaction occurring in 46 (77%) of 60 toddlers and 39 (65%) of 60 infants. Related unsolicited adverse events, most commonly discolouration at the application site, were reported in 35 (58%) of 60 toddlers and 57 (95%) of 60 infants that had received the MRV-MNP. All local reactions were mild. There were no related severe or serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: The safety and immunogenicity data support the accelerated development of the MRV-MNP. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation