How reliable are systematic reviews in empirical software engineering?

BACKGROUND – the systematic review is becoming a more commonly employed research instrument in empirical software engineering. Before undue reliance is placed on the outcomes of such reviews it would seem useful to consider the robustness of the approach in this particular research context. OBJECTIVE – the aim of this study is to assess the reliability of systematic reviews as a research instrument. In particular we wish to investigate the consistency of process and the stability of outcomes. METHOD – we compare the results of two independent reviews under taken with a common research question. RESULTS – the two reviews find similar answers to the research question, although the means of arriving at those answers vary. CONCLUSIONS – in addressing a well-bounded research question, groups of researchers with similar domain experience can arrive at the same review outcomes, even though they may do so in different ways. This provides evidence that, in this context at least, the systematic review is a robust research method

Cortical strut allografting in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery

Many approaches are used in the repair of skeletal defects in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery, and bone grafting is involved in virtually every procedure. Autografting remains the gold standard for replacing bone loss. However, the limited amount of bone that can be harvested and the morbidity associated with that procedure are major constraints to the clinical use of autografts. In contrast, bone allografts can be used in any kind of surgery, whether involving minor defects or major bone loss. Cortical strut allografts unite to host bone through callus formation, restoring bone stock and can be used as an onlay biological plate. These struts can be made from hemicylinders of tibia being fixed to host bone by circumferential metallic cables or by screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze the radiographic outcomes of twelve cryopreserved cortical onlay strut allografts, used in a group of nine patients, for revision hip arthroplasty of the femoral side, to stabilize femoral periprosthetic fractures, to reinforce poor cortical bone and to treat one atrophic femoral nonunion. The average follow-up period was 4.3 years (range, 1.6 to 9 years). No fractures, nonunions or progressive resorption of the bone allografts were observed. All struts were incorporated to the native femur with minimal resorption, within the first year after surgery. There was no failure of any of the allograft reconstructions.The results obtained show that cortical onlay strut allografts, either alone or in conjunction with metallic plate or cancellous bone allografts, are a valuable adjunct for reconstructive surgery of the hip and to treat atrophic femoral nonunion

Antimicrobial activity of Piper arboreum and Piper tuberculatum (Piperaceae) against opportunistic yeasts

In the scope of our ongoing research on bioactive agents from natural sources, 24 extracts and fractions obtained from Piper arboreum Aub. and Piper tuberculatum Jacq. (Piperaceae) were screenedfor antifungal activity by using broth microdilution method. The current investigation reveals that P. arboreum extracts and fractions were more effective against Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis than Cryptococcus neoformans. The growth of Candida albicans was weakly affected by all the tested extracts and fractions. The strongest effects were observed for hexane and ethyl acetate fractions from leaves of P. arboreum, with MIC values (in ìg/ml) of 15.6 and 31.2 ìg/ml against C. krusei, respectively. Additionally, phytochemical investigation of the hexane fraction of P. arboreum leaves furnished 3 pyrrolidine amides; piperyline, 4,5-dihydropiperyline and tetrahydropiperyline, which could be responsible, at least in part for the observed antifungal activity. The most active compound, tetrahydropiperyline, displayed MIC values of 15.6 ìg/ml against C. krusei, C. parapsilosis and C. neoformans

New Vaccines

Introdução: As vacinas previnem mais casos de doença do que qualquer tratamento médico. A informação sobre novas vacinas introduzidas no mercado e não incluídas no Programa Nacional de Vacinação (PNV) é no entanto por vezes pouco divulgada, e o seu conhecimento limitado. Objectivos: Avaliar o conhecimento, geral e específico, dos pais de crianças saudáveis relativamente a três vacinas não incluídas no PNV: pneumocócica (PCV7), varicela (Var) e rotavírus (RV). Material e Métodos: Estudo descritivo transversal, realizado sob a forma de inquérito, aplicado de forma aleatória aos pais de crianças observadas em três centros de saúde de Portugal (Lisboa, Porto e Queluz), entre Março e Abril de 2007. Analisaram-se parâmetros sociodemográficos, grau de conhecimento (a existência e tipo de doença prevenível pelas as três vacinas), sua realização ou intenção de realização e disponibilidade de aquisição das mesmas por parte dos pais. Análise estatística pelos testes Qui-quadrado e t-Student (IC>95%). Considerou-se p <0,05 com significado estatístico. Resultados: Entrevistaram-se pais de 187 crianças com uma idade mediana de 13 meses. A maioria (82%) tinha ensino secundário incompleto e rendimento mensal médio de 1256€. Em 83% das entrevistas os pais conheciam pelo menos uma das vacinas: pneumocócica (72%), varicela (42%) e rotavírus (1,3%) e pela mesma ordem o tipo de doença que cada vacina prevenia: 118/135 (87%), 83/84 (99%) e 21/24 (87,5%). Em 80% dos casos a informação fora disponibilizada aos pais por profissionais de saúde: pediatra (67) e médico assistente (49). A maioria (96%) considerou a PCV7 a vacina mais importante. Das crianças avaliadas, o PNV estava actualizado em 93% dos casos; adicionalmente 39% tinham a vacina pneumocócica, 0,5% da varicela e 3% do rotavírus. O conhecimento sobre a vacina da varicela e rotavírus associou-se a um maior nível de escolaridade dos pais(40vs46,p=0,018; 8vs16,p=0,026) e a realização da vacina pneumocócica e do rotavírus a um melhor rendimento familiar (1506€vs1144€ p=0,04) e (2283€vs1162€; p=0,04). Conclusão: Á excepção da PCV7 as restantes vacinas são ainda insuficientemente conhecidas. Compete aos profissionais de saúde, divulgar informação e motivar as famílias para a vacinação

Dermite de Contacto à Mitomicina C. 6 Casos

A Mitomicina C está entre uma variedade de agentes quimioterapêuticos intravesicais actualmente disponíveis para o tratamento do carcinoma superficial da bexiga. Cerca de9% destes doentes desenvolve reacções adversas cutâneas, geralmente dermites de contacto, localizadas nas mãos, pés, genitais, ou erupções mais disseminadas. Descrevem-se 6 casos de dermite de contacto alérgica à Mitomicina C, observados entre Junho/2004 e Março/2005,emcinco doentes do sexo masculino e umdo sexo feminino, com uma idade média de 70 anos

Situational-Context for Virtually Modeling the Elderly

The generalized aging of the population is incrementing the pressure over, frequently overextended, healthcare systems. This situations is even worse in underdeveloped, sparsely populated regions like Extremadura in Spain or Alentejo in Portugal. In this paper we propose an initial approach to use the Situational-Context, a technique to seamlessly adapt Internet of Things systems to the needs and preferences of their users, for virtually modeling the elderly. These models could be used to enhance the elderly experience when using those kind of systems without raising the need for technical skills. The proposed virtual models will also be the basis for further eldercare innovations in sparsely populated regions

Compreender a Recorrência dos Mixomas Cardíacos. Um Caso Clínico

Recurrence of cardiac myxoma is a rare condition, observed in about 3% of patients in sporadic cases, although it is more frequent in familial ones. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain such recurrence, and the importance of increased vascularization as a facilitating feature is the subject of debate. The authors report the case of a non-familial right atrial myxoma, unusual for both its histopathology and recurrence

The Biological Assessment and Rehabilitation of the World’s Rivers: An Overview

The biological assessment of rivers i.e., their assessment through use of aquatic assemblages, integrates the effects of multiple-stressors on these systems over time and is essential to evaluate ecosystem condition and establish recovery measures. It has been undertaken in many countries since the 1990s, but not globally. And where national or multi-national monitoring networks have gathered large amounts of data, the poor water body classifications have not necessarily resulted in the rehabilitation of rivers. Thus, here we aimed to identify major gaps in the biological assessment and rehabilitation of rivers worldwide by focusing on the best examples in Asia, Europe, Oceania, and North, Central, and South America. Our study showed that it is not possible so far to draw a world map of the ecological quality of rivers. Biological assessment of rivers and streams is only implemented officially nation-wide and regularly in the European Union, Japan, Republic of Korea, South Africa, and the USA. In Australia, Canada, China, New Zealand, and Singapore it has been implemented officially at the state/province level (in some cases using common protocols) or in major catchments or even only once at the national level to define reference conditions (Australia). In other cases, biological monitoring is driven by a specific problem, impact assessments, water licenses, or the need to rehabilitate a river or a river section (as in Brazil, South Korea, China, Canada, Japan, Australia). In some countries monitoring programs have only been explored by research teams mostly at the catchment or local level (e.g., Brazil, Mexico, Chile, China, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam) or implemented by citizen science groups (e.g., Southern Africa, Gambia, East Africa, Australia, Brazil, Canada). The existing large-extent assessments show a striking loss of biodiversity in the last 2–3 decades in Japanese and New Zealand rivers (e.g., 42% and 70% of fish species threatened or endangered, respectively). A poor condition (below Good condition) exists in 25% of South Korean rivers, half of the European water bodies, and 44% of USA rivers, while in Australia 30% of the reaches sampled were significantly impaired in 2006. Regarding river rehabilitation, the greatest implementation has occurred in North America, Australia, Northern Europe, Japan, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea. Most rehabilitation measures have been related to improving water quality and river connectivity for fish or the improvement of riparian vegetation. The limited extent of most rehabilitation measures (i.e., not considering the entire catchment) often constrains the improvement of biological condition. Yet, many rehabilitation projects also lack pre-and/or post-monitoring of ecological condition, which prevents assessing the success and shortcomings of the recovery measures. Economic constraints are the most cited limitation for implementing monitoring programs and rehabilitation actions, followed by technical limitations, limited knowledge of the fauna and flora and their life-history traits (especially in Africa, South America and Mexico), and poor awareness by decision-makers. On the other hand, citizen involvement is recognized as key to the success and sustainability of rehabilitation projects. Thus, establishing rehabilitation needs, defining clear goals, tracking progress towards achieving them, and involving local populations and stakeholders are key recommendations for rehabilitation projects (Table 1). Large-extent and long-term monitoring programs are also essential to provide a realistic overview of the condition of rivers worldwide. Soon, the use of DNA biological samples and eDNA to investigate aquatic diversity could contribute to reducing costs and thus increase monitoring efforts and a more complete assessment of biodiversity. Finally, we propose developing transcontinental teams to elaborate and improve technical guidelines for implementing biological monitoring programs and river rehabilitation and establishing common financial and technical frameworks for managing international catchments. We also recommend providing such expert teams through the United Nations Environment Program to aid the extension of biomonitoring, bioassessment, and river rehabilitation knowledge globally