practical considerations for diagnosis and management of patients and carriers

Abstract Newly diagnosed children and adults with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) need to be screened for presence of a genetic predisposition syndrome because the information on the genetic status is likely to influence clinical care and management of the patient and the family. Scenarios in which genetic counseling is advised include presence of a mutation on somatic screen that can be associated with a germline predisposition, hematologic or cytogenetic characteristics suggestive of an underlying susceptibility syndrome, non-hematological phenotype suspicious for a familial condition, history of previous malignancy, or a family history of cancer, cytopenia, autoimmunity, or organ-system manifestation fitting a predisposition syndrome. With increasing complexity on phenotypes, genetics, and leukemia risk of the recently recognized predisposition syndromes, specialized clinics for hereditary hematologic malignancies have been initiated to guide genetic testing and support hematologists integrating genetic data into therapeutic strategies and clinical care. Recommendations for surveillance of carriers are currently based on expert opinion and subject to future modification when a more complete picture for the distinct genetic entities will arise

A distinct epigenetic program underlies the 1;7 translocation in myelodysplastic syndromes

n/

T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma Arising in the Setting of Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia: LMO2 Immunohistochemistry as a Potentially Useful Diagnostic Marker

Simple Summary Rarely, T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) may develop in the setting of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia. Given important therapeutic implications, it is crucial to identify T-LBL arising in this particular context. LIM domain only 2 (LMO2) is known to be overexpressed in almost all sporadic T-LBL and not in immature TdT-positive T-cells in the thymus and in indolent T-lymphoblastic proliferations. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features of 11 cases of T-LBL occurring in the setting of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and investigated the immunohistochemical expression of LMO2 in this setting of T-LBL. Interestingly, 9/11 cases were LMO2 negative, with only 2 cases showing partial expression. In our study, we would suggest that LMO2 immunostaining, as part of the diagnostic panel for T-LBL, may represent a useful marker to identify T-LBL developing in the context of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia. Background: Rarely, T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) may develop in the setting of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LNs-Eo), a group of diseases with gene fusion resulting in overexpression of an aberrant tyrosine kinase or cytokine receptor. The correct identification of this category has relevant therapeutic implications. LIM domain only 2 (LMO2) is overexpressed in most T-LBL, but not in immature TdT-positive T-cells in the thymus and in indolent T-lymphoblastic proliferations (iT-LBP). Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated 11 cases of T-LBL occurring in the context of M/LNs-Eo. Clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular features were collected and LMO2 immunohistochemical staining was performed. The critical re-evaluation of these cases confirmed the diagnosis of T-LBL with morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular features consistent with T-LBL occurring in M/LNs-Eo. Interestingly, LMO2 immunohistochemical analysis was negative in 9/11 cases, whereas only 2 cases revealed a partial LMO2 expression with a moderate and low degree of intensity, respectively. Conclusions: LMO2 may represent a potentially useful marker to identify T-LBL developing in the context of M/LNs-Eo. In this setting, T-LBL shows LMO2 immunohistochemical profile overlapping with cortical thymocytes and iT-LBP, possibly reflecting different molecular patterns involved in the pathogenesis of T-LBL arising in the setting of M/LNs-Eo

Germline <i>GATA2</i> variant disrupting endothelial eNOS function and angiogenesis can be restored by c-Jun/AP-1 upregulation

GATA2 is a transcription factor with key roles in hematopoiesis. Germline GATA2 gene variants have been associated with several inherited and acquired hematologic disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes. Among the spectrum of GATA2 deficiency- associated manifestations thrombosis has been reported in 25% of patients, but the mechanisms are unknown. GATA2 was shown to be involved in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) regulation and vascular development. We assessed eNOS expression and angiogenesis in patients with GATA2 deficiency. Platelets and blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) from GATA2 variant carriers showed impaired NO production and reduction of eNOS mRNA and protein expression and of eNOS activity. GATA2 binding to the eNOS gene was impaired in BOEC from GATA2-deficient patients, differently from control BOEC. GATA2 deficiency BOEC showed also defective angiogenesis, which was completely restored by treatment with the NO-donor Snitroso- N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP). Atorvastatin, but not resveratrol, largely restored eNOS expression, NO biosynthesis and neoangiogenesis in GATA2-deficient BOEC by a mechanism involving increased expression of the eNOS transcription factor AP-1/c-JUN, replacing GATA2 when the latter is inactive. Our results unravel a possible thrombogenic mechanism of GATA2 mutations, definitely establish the regulation of eNOS by GATA2 in endothelial cells and show that endothelial angiogenesis is strictly dependent on the eNOS/NO axis. Given the ability of atorvastatin to restore NO production and angiogenesis by GATA2-deficient endothelial cells, the preventive effect of atorvastatin on thrombotic events and possibly on other clinical manifestations of the syndrome related to deranged angiogenesis should be explored in patients with GATA2 deficiency in an ad hoc designed clinical trial