16 research outputs found
Rethink Vape: Development and evaluation of a risk communication campaign to prevent youth E-cigarette use
The Welfare Consequences of Strategic Voting in Two Commonly Used Parliamentary Agendas
This paper studies the welfare consequences of strategic voting in two commonly used parliamentary agendas by comparing the average utilities obtained in simulated voting under two behavioural assumptions: expected utility maximising behaviour and sincere behaviour. The average utility obtained in simulations is higher with expected utility maximising behaviour than with sincere voting behaviour under a broad range of assumptions. Strategic voting increases welfare particularly if the distribution of preference intensities correlates with voter types. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007agendas, counterbalancing, simulation, strategic voting, welfare, D71, D81,
The Mount Feather Diamicton of the Sirius Group: an accumulation of indicators of Neogene Antarctic glacial and climatic history
Virginia, Rochester, and Bloomington: Twenty-five years of public choice and political science
Anestesia epidural com lidocaína isolada e associada ao fentanil para realização de ováriossalpingo-histerectomia em cadelas
Explaining obesity with urban form: a cautionary tale
Land use, Obesity, Specification bias, Urban form,