Expression of CXCL10 is associated with response to radiotherapy and overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

Five-year survival for patients with oral cancer has been disappointingly stable during the last decades, creating a demand for new biomarkers and treatment targets. Lately, much focus has been set on immunomodulation as a possible treatment or an adjuvant increasing sensitivity to conventional treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic importance of response to radiotherapy in tongue carcinoma patients as well as the expression of the CXC-chemokines in correlation to radiation response in the same group of tumours. Thirty-eight patients with tongue carcinoma that had received radiotherapy followed by surgery were included. The prognostic impact of pathological response to radiotherapy, N-status, T-stage, age and gender was evaluated using Cox's regression models, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square test. The expression of 23 CXC-chemokine ligands and their receptors were evaluated in all patients using microarray and qPCR and correlated with response to treatment using logistic regression. Pathological response to radiotherapy was independently associated to overall survival with a 2-year survival probability of 81 % for patients showing a complete pathological response, while patients with a non-complete response only had a probability of 42 % to survive for 2 years (p = 0.016). The expression of one CXC-chemokine, CXCL10, was significantly associated with response to radiotherapy and the group of patients with the highest CXCL10 expression responded, especially poorly (p = 0.01). CXCL10 is a potential marker for response to radiotherapy and overall survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

Robusta biomarkörer för prediktion av risk och sjukdom : en utvärdering av reproducerbarheten hos de stora kommersiella omik-plattformarna

I och med utveckling inom storskalig analys av blodprover har man idag insett nyttan av att omvandla biobanker med lagrade humanprover till data-banker där forskare snabbt kan få tillgång till data för att svara på forsknings-frågor. Problemet är att många av teknikerna för att skapa storskaliga data är semikvantitativa, värdena går inte att relatera till en absolut koncentration och är därmed svåra att slå samman och jämföra över tid. Randomisering, det vill säga att proverna analyseras i slumpvis inbördes ordning, är en av de viktigas-te aspekterna för att skapa data som går att slå samman och återanvända för många forskningsfrågor. Detta underlättar korrigering av oönskade analysva-riationer över tid. Utöver detta kan man använda sig av bryggningsprover, QC-prov (kvalitetskontrollprov) eller ankarprover, som analyseras upprepat både inom och mellan analystillfällen, vilket underlättar att lägga samman dataset som analyseras vid olika tillfällen. Många kommersiella analysplattformar inkluderar ett eget QC-prov i analysen och vissa delar med sig av data för dessa prover. Det vore värdefullt om alla plattformar delade dessa data för kvalitetsutvärdering och eventuell korrige-ring av analysvariationer över tid. För alla semikvantitativa plattformar som undersöktes (Olink, Somalogic, Metabolon och Biocrates) var den tekniska variabiliteten mellan QC-proverna betydligt lägre än variabiliteten mellan ana-lyserade plasmaprover. Detta var tydligast för proteomikplattformarna, vilket antyder att förutsättningarna att upptäcka biologiska skillnader är bättre i pro-teomikdata. Undantaget från detta är en femte plattform, Nightingale, en kvan-titativ men smalare metabololmikmetod som anses generera stabila mätningar. Vid all utveckling av biomarkörpaneler för att prediktera sjukdom behöver man göra upptäcktsanalyser, sedan valideringsstudier och därefter tester i den situation man tänker att testet ska fungera. De breda omikplattformarna läm-par sig för upptäckt och eventuellt validering, men för det faktiska kliniska tes-tet behövs en kvantitativ analys för att verkligen utvärdera att de proteiner eller metaboliter man vill använda är stabilt uppmätbara och fungerar för att pre-diktera sjukdom eller risk för sjukdom

Flowchart illustrating experimental procedure.

<p>Description of the procedures used to assess samples from RNA extraction to acquiring of gene lists, including samples removed following each step of analysis. Tumour samples are abbreviated T and controls C.</p

Linear regression analysis.

<p>Regression model describing how much of the variation in sample quality (Ct_diff) can be explained by sample storage time prior to extraction.</p

Average number of A,C,G,T and occurrence of two or more consecutive Gs in probe sequence for the 10 most and the 10 least affected genes and p values for all affected compared to remaining genes.

a<p>Mann-Whitney U test.</p

Specific functions for Mediator complex subunits from different modules in the transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana to abiotic stress

Adverse environmental conditions are detrimental to plant growth and development. Acclimation to abiotic stress conditions involves activation of signaling pathways which often results in changes in gene expression via networks of transcription factors (TFs). Mediator is a highly conserved co-regulator complex and an essential component of the transcriptional machinery in eukaryotes. Some Mediator subunits have been implicated in stress-responsive signaling pathways; however, much remains unknown regarding the role of plant Mediator in abiotic stress responses. Here, we use RNA-seq to analyze the transcriptional response of Arabidopsis thaliana to heat, cold and salt stress conditions. We identify a set of common abiotic stress regulons and describe the sequential and combinatorial nature of TFs involved in their transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, we identify stress-specific roles for the Mediator subunits MED9, MED16, MED18 and CDK8, and putative TFs connecting them to different stress signaling pathways. Our data also indicate different modes of action for subunits or modules of Mediator at the same gene loci, including a co-repressor function for MED16 prior to stress. These results illuminate a poorly understood but important player in the transcriptional response of plants to abiotic stress and identify target genes and mechanisms as a prelude to further biochemical characterization

Confirmation of four genes in 20 fresh frozen sample using qPCR.

a<p>Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test.</p

Example of three genes and how their expression was affected by difference in sample quality (Ct_diff).

<p>(A), (B) and (C) Linear regression analysis of the genes YPEL5, TRPM4 and the short non-coding gene SNORA10 describing the relationship between expression of the gene and sample quality (CT_diff). All 78 samples are included and analysis was performed using non-normalized data. (D), (E) and (F) Linear regression analysis of the same genes using normalized data. Samples and regression line for tumours are denoted in blue and sample and regression line for controls in red.</p

Quality measurements of FFPE controls and tumours.

a<p>Mann-Whitney U test.</p>b<p>4 samples did not generate sufficient RNA (<40 ong).</p>c<p>1 sample failed the PCR reaction.</p>d<p>4 tumours and 1 control failed to fulfil array requirements.</p