Nivolumab and interferon-γ rescue therapy to control mixed mould and bacterial superinfection after necrotizing fasciitis and septic shock

Immunosuppression is a major feature of septic shock and patients are at increased risk for opportunistic infections. We describe a successful use of immunostimulation to treat mixed mould and bacterial superinfection in a previously healthy 38-year-old female patient admitted for severe extensive fasciitis. Interferon gamma associated with nivolumab reversed successfully deactivation of immune cells assessed by altered expressions of monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) and lymphocyte programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1). Immunosuppressed patients in ICU with invasive bacterial and fungal infections may benefit from immunostimulation

Necrotizing external otitis: analysis of relapse risk factors in 66 patients managed during a 12 year period

International audienceAbstract Background Necrotizing external otitis (NEO) is a severe infection of the skull base that occurs generally in the elderly and/or in diabetic recipients. There are few data in the literature about the therapeutic management of this complex bone infection. Objectives To analyse relapses after NEO treatment completion, and to describe the clinical features of NEO. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in the Lyon regional reference centre for the management of complex bone and joint infections. Consecutive cases of NEO from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the relapse of NEO. Variables were analysed using Cox regression survival analysis with adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and Kaplan–Meier curve. Results Sixty-six patients were included. Median age was 75 (IQR 69–81) years and 46 (70%) patients were diabetic. Eleven patients (17%) had temporomandibular arthritis, 10 (15%) cranial nerve paralysis, 2 (3%) cerebral thrombophlebitis, and 2 (3%) contiguous abscess. Microbiological documentation was obtained in 56 patients and revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 44/56 patients (79%). Nine (14%) cases had no microbiological documentation. Antibiotic therapy was dual for 63 (95%) patients. During a median follow-up of 27 (IQR 12–40) months, 16 out of 63 (25%) patients experienced a relapse. Fungal infection was significantly associated with relapse [aHR 4.1 (95% CI 1.1–15); P = 0.03]. Conclusions NEO is a severe bone infection, mainly (but not exclusively) caused by P. aeruginosa, which occurs in elderly and diabetic recipients. Fungal infections at baseline significantly impact the outcome

Correction to: National dose reference levels in computed tomography–guided interventional procedures—a proposal

International audienceAbstract Computed tomography imaging plays a major role in the preoperative assessment of tumor burden by providing an accurate mapping of the distribution of peritoneal metastases (PM). Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography (SPCCT) is an innovative imaging modality that could overcome the current limitations of conventional CT, offering not only better spatial resolution but also better contrast resolution by allowing the discrimination of multiple contrast agents. Based on this capability, we tested the feasibility of SPCCT in the detection of PM at different time of tumor growth in 16 rats inoculated with CC531 cells using dual-contrast injection protocols in two compartments (i.e. intravenous iodine and intraperitoneal gadolinium or the reverse protocol), compared to surgery. For all peritoneal regions and for both protocols, sensitivity was 69%, specificity was 100% and accuracy was 80%, and the correlation with surgical exploration was strong ( p = 0.97; p = 0.0001). No significant difference was found in terms of diagnostic performance, quality of peritoneal opacification or diagnostic quality between the 2 injection protocols. We also showed poor vascularization of peritoneal metastases by measuring low concentrations of contrast agent in the largest lesions using SPCCT, which was confirmed by immunohistochemical analyses. In conclusion, SPCCT using dual-contrast agent injection protocols in 2 compartments is a promising imaging modality to assess the extent of PM in a rat model

National dose reference levels in computed tomography–guided interventional procedures—a proposal

International audienc

Necrotizing external otitis: analysis of relapse risk factors in 66 patients managed during a 12 year period

Abstract Background Necrotizing external otitis (NEO) is a severe infection of the skull base that occurs generally in the elderly and/or in diabetic recipients. There are few data in the literature about the therapeutic management of this complex bone infection. Objectives To analyse relapses after NEO treatment completion, and to describe the clinical features of NEO. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study in the Lyon regional reference centre for the management of complex bone and joint infections. Consecutive cases of NEO from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the relapse of NEO. Variables were analysed using Cox regression survival analysis with adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and Kaplan–Meier curve. Results Sixty-six patients were included. Median age was 75 (IQR 69–81) years and 46 (70%) patients were diabetic. Eleven patients (17%) had temporomandibular arthritis, 10 (15%) cranial nerve paralysis, 2 (3%) cerebral thrombophlebitis, and 2 (3%) contiguous abscess. Microbiological documentation was obtained in 56 patients and revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 44/56 patients (79%). Nine (14%) cases had no microbiological documentation. Antibiotic therapy was dual for 63 (95%) patients. During a median follow-up of 27 (IQR 12–40) months, 16 out of 63 (25%) patients experienced a relapse. Fungal infection was significantly associated with relapse [aHR 4.1 (95% CI 1.1–15); P = 0.03]. Conclusions NEO is a severe bone infection, mainly (but not exclusively) caused by P. aeruginosa, which occurs in elderly and diabetic recipients. Fungal infections at baseline significantly impact the outcome. </jats:sec

Peripheral neuropathy during long-term suppressive therapy with tedizolid: a case series

International audienceAbstract Background and objectives Due to its potentially better long-term haematologic tolerance compared to linezolid, tedizolid represents an attractive option for prolonged antibiotic therapy in complicated/chronic Gram-positive infections. However, there is little information regarding the risk of peripheral neurological toxicity, representing another obstacle to the extended use of oxazolidinones. Reporting neurologic adverse events occurring during tedizolid therapy for chronic implant-associated infections. Patients and methods Patients experiencing tedizolid-associated neurologic adverse events were retrospectively described in a case series. Results Five patients (four males; age range, 65–75 years) receiving tedizolid (200 mg q24h) as long-term suppressive therapy for chronic implant-associated infection presented with peripheral neuropathy. In four cases, tedizolid was used after discontinuation of linezolid for toxicity, including one case of neuropathy. Three had at least one additional risk factor for neuropathy (including two diabetes, one of them with diabetes-related nephropathy). Neuropathic symptoms [paraesthesia (n = 2), worsening of pre-existing neuropathy (n = 2), dysesthesias (n = 1)] appeared after a median of 12.4 (IQR, 8.2–13.3) months of tedizolid treatment. Electromyoneurography (EMNG) confirmed axonal sensory polyneuropathy in all but one patient for which EMNG was still within normal ranges, but compatible with incipient neurotoxicity. Tedizolid was stopped in all patients, three patients required specific treatment for neuropathic pain. At last follow-up [2.4 (IQR, 1–2.5) years from tedizolid discontinuation], clinical recovery from neuropathy was noted in three patients. The two patients with persistent neuropathy symptoms were diabetic; one showed EMNG improvement. Conclusions Prolonged used of tedizolid may be associated with peripheral neurologic toxicity, which should be monitored in at-risk patients