Prevalence and significance of fragmented QRS complex in lead V₁ on the surface electrocardiogramof healthy athletes

Aims Limited data exist concerning fragmented QRS complexes (fQRSs) on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) of apparently healthy athletes. We aimed to study the prevalence and significance of fQRS in lead V-1 (fQRS(V1)), representing right ventricular (RV) activation, regarding training-induced RV morphological remodelling. Methods and results Between January 2017 and August 2019, 434 consecutive non-sedentary subjects underwent preparticipation cardiovascular screening, including a 12-lead ECG. Three hundred and ninety-three apparently healthy subjects were included, 119 of them were athletes (defined as performing >= 8 h/week for the last 6 months) and 274 were non-athletes. All athletes underwent two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Fragmented QRS complex in lead V-1 pattern was defined as a narrow (<120 ms) and quadriphasic QRS complex in lead V-1. Fragmented QRS complex in lead V-1 was more frequent in athletes compared with non-athletes (22% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and was independently associated with the athlete status [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.693, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.299-9.583; P < 0.001], the endurance category (aOR = 2.522, 95% CI 1.176-5.408; P = 0.017), and age (aOR = 0.962, 95% CI 0.934-0.989; P = 0.007) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of athletes, fQRS(V1) was independently associated with mean RV outflow tract diameter (aOR = 1.458, 95% CI 1.105-1.923; P = 0.008) and age (aOR = 0.941, 95% CI 0.894-0.989; P = 0.017) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Fragmented QRS complex in lead V1 is a newly described, frequent, ECG pattern in young and apparently healthy athletes and is associated with training-induced RV remodelling

Effects of highest dose of sacubitril/valsartan association compared to lower doses on mortality and ventricular arrhythmias

Background: Sudden cardiac death is a major healthcare issue in reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF) patients. Recently, the new association of sacubitril/valsartan showed a reduction of both ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and mortality even at low dose compared to enalapril in HF patients. The purpose of our study was to assess whether the highest dose of sacubitril/valsartan compared to lower doses may improve the rate of death and VA in a population of patients with HFrEF and with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Methods: 104 HF patients with reduced EF under sacubitril/valsartan with an ICD were divided in 2 groups: the first one with the lower doses of sacubitril/valsartan (24/26 mg or 49 mg/51 mg twice daily) and the second with the maximal dose (97mg/103mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a composite of death or appropriate ICD therapy for VA. Results: After a median follow-up of 14 months, 39 patients were treated with lower doses and 65 patients with the highest dose. Patients from the lower doses group were older (70 [60-80] vs. 66 [60-70]; p = 0,03), more symptomatic at initiation (NYHA 3: 44% vs. 19%; p &lt; 0,01) and more often in atrial fibrillation (31% vs. 12%; p = 0,04). The primary composite endpoint occurred in 14 patients (36%) in the low doses group versus 7 patients (11%) in high dose group (p &lt; 0,01). This difference was particularly observed in the subgroup of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In a multivariable analysis, the higher dose was independently associated with the primary outcome with an HR = 2,934 [IC 95% 1,147 &ndash; 7,504]; p = 0,03. Kaplan-Meier curve showed an early effect of the highest dose of sacubitril/valsartan association. Conclusion: Patients with HFrEF under the highest dose of sacubitril/valsartan showed better clinical outcomes with a decrease of both mortality or appropriated ICD therapies related to ventricular arrhythmias