Reductions in serum IGF-1 during aging impair health span

In lower or simple species, such as worms and flies, disruption of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and the insulin signaling pathways has been shown to increase lifespan. In rodents, however, growth hormone (GH) regulates IGF-1 levels in serum and tissues and can modulate lifespan via/or independent of IGF- 1. Rodent models, where the GH/IGF-1 axis was ablated congenitally, show increased lifespan. However, in contrast to rodents where serum IGF-1 levels are high throughout life, in humans, serum IGF-1 peaks during puberty and declines thereafter during aging. Thus, animal models with congenital disruption of the GH/ IGF-1 axis are unable to clearly distinguish between developmental and age-related effects of GH/IGF-1 on health. To overcome this caveat, we developed an inducible liver IGF-1- deficient (iLID) mouse that allows temporal control of serum IGF- 1. Deletion of liver Igf -1 gene at one year of age reduced serum IGF-1 by 70% and dramatically impaired health span of the iLID mice. Reductions in serum IGF-1 were coupled with increased GH levels and increased basal STAT5B phosphorylation in livers of iLID mice. These changes were associated with increased liver weight, increased liver inflammation, increased oxidative stress in liver and muscle, and increased incidence of hepatic tumors. Lastly, despite elevations in serum GH, low levels of serum IGF-1 from 1 year of age compromised skeletal integrity and accelerated bone loss. We conclude that an intact GH/IGF-1 axis is essential to maintain health span and that elevated GH, even late in life, associates with increased pathology

Comparison of CRISPR and adenovirus-mediated Myd88 knockdown in RAW 264.7 cells and responses to lipopolysaccharide stimulation

Genomic manipulation offers the possibility for novel therapies in lieu of medical interventions in use today. The ability togenetically restore missing inflammatory genes will have a monumental impact on our current immunotherapy treatments. This study compared the efficacy of two different genetic manipulation techniques: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) transfection to adenoviral transduction to determine which method would provide the most transient and stable knockdown of myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88). MyD88 is a major regulator of nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) pathway in Raw 264.7 macrophages. Following genetic manipulation, cells were treated for 24 h with Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to stimulate the inflammatory pathway. Confirmation of knockdown was determined by western immunoblotting and quantification of band density. Both CRISPR/Cas9 and adenoviral transduction produced similar knockdown efficiency (~64% and 60%, respectively) in MyD88 protein 48 h post adenoviral transduction. NFκB phosphorylation was increased in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated MyD88 knockdown and control cells, but not in adenovirus-mediated MyD88 knockdown cells, following LPS administration. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated MyD88 knockdown macrophages treated with LPS for 24 h showed a 65% reduction in tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) secretion, and a 67% reduction in interleukin-10 (IL-10) secretion when compared to LPS-stimulated control cells (P ≤ 0.01 for both). LPS did not stimulate TNFα or IL-10 secretion in adenovirus-mediated control or MyD88 knockdown cells. These data demonstrate that Raw 264.7 macrophages maintain responsiveness to inflammatory stimuli following CRISPR/Cas9-mediated reductions in MyD88, but not following adenovirus-mediated MyD88 knockdown

The dose–response effects of arachidonic acid on primary human skeletal myoblasts and myotubes

Background Cellular inflammatory response, mediated by arachidonic acid (AA) and cyclooxygenase, is a highly regulated process that leads to the repair of damaged tissue. Recent studies on murine C2C12 cells have demonstrated that AA supplementation leads to myotube hypertrophy. However, AA has not been tested on primary human muscle cells. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether AA supplementation has similar effects on human muscle cells. Methods Proliferating and differentiating human myoblasts were exposed to AA in a dose-dependent manner (50–0.80 µM) for 48 (myoblasts) or 72 (myotubes) hours. Cell viability was tested using a 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay and cell counting; myotube area was determined by immunocytochemistry and confocal microscopy; and anabolic signaling pathways were evaluated by western blot and RT-PCR. Results Our data show that the treatment of primary human myoblasts treated with 50 µM and 25 µM of AA led to the release of PGE2 and PGF2α at levels higher than those of control-treated cells (p < 0.001 for all concentrations). Additionally, 50 µM and 25 µM of AA suppressed myoblast proliferation, myotube area, and myotube fusion. Anabolic signaling indicated reductions in total and phosphorylated TSC2, AKT, S6, and 4EBP1 in myoblasts at 50 µM of AA (p < 0.01 for all), but not in myotubes. These changes were not affected by COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib. Conclusion Together, our data demonstrate that high concentrations of AA inhibit myoblast proliferation, myotube fusion, and myotube hypertrophy, thus revealing potential deleterious effects of AA on human skeletal muscle cell health and viability

Transcriptional and Chromatin Dynamics of Muscle Regeneration after Severe Trauma

Following injury, adult skeletal muscle undergoes a well-coordinated sequence of molecular and physiological events to promote repair and regeneration. However, a thorough understanding of the in vivo epigenomic and transcriptional mechanisms that control these reparative events is lacking. To address this, we monitored the in vivo dynamics of three histone modifications and coding and noncoding RNA expression throughout the regenerative process in a mouse model of traumatic muscle injury. We first illustrate how both coding and noncoding RNAs in tissues and sorted satellite cells are modified and regulated during various stages after trauma. Next, we use chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing to evaluate the chromatin state of cis-regulatory elements (promoters and enhancers) and view how these elements evolve and influence various muscle repair and regeneration transcriptional programs. These results provide a comprehensive view of the central factors that regulate muscle regeneration and underscore the multiple levels through which both transcriptional and epigenetic patterns are regulated to enact appropriate repair and regeneration