Emergency peripartum hysterectomies at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania: Review of cases from 2003 to 2007

A retrospective review of all cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy performed between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2007 at Muhimbili National Hospital was done to determine the incidence, indications and complications, background characteristics, antenatal care attendance, referral status, and maternal and foetal outcomes. There were 55,152 deliveries during the study period and 165 cases of emergency peripartum hysterectomy, giving the incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy of 3 per 1000 deliveries. The main indication was uterine rupture (79%) followed by severe post-partum haemorrhage due to uterine atony (12.7%). The case fatality rate was 10.3% where as perinatal mortality rate was 7.7 per 1000 deliveries. The common complication identified intraoperatively was severe haemorrhage which accounted for 39.4% where as intensive care unit admissions (14.4%) and febrile morbidity (12.4%) were common after the operation. Blood was ordered in all cases but in 31 cases it was indicated that it was not available. Seventy nine patients received blood transfusion with the maximum number of units given to one patient being eight. Twenty two patients were given fresh frozen plasma (FFP), the median number of units given was two (range = 1– 6). In conclusion, emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a life saving procedure and very common at MNH. The most common indication was ruptured uterus followed by severe postpartum haemorrhage. More than half of the patients underwent emergency peripartum hysterectomy were referred from other health facilities with ruptured or suspected ruptured uterus. The procedure was associated with unacceptably high maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality

Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy?

Background The association of grand multiparity and poor pregnancy outcome has not been consistent for decades. Classifying grand multiparous women as a high-risk group without clear evidence of a consistent association with adverse outcomes can lead to socioeconomic burdens to the mother, family and health systems. We compared the maternal and perinatal complications among grand multiparous and other multiparous women in Dar es Salaam in Tanzania. Methods A cross-sectional study was undertaken at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH). A standard questionnaire enquired the following variables: demographic characteristics, antenatal profile and detected obstetric risk factors as well as maternal and neonatal risk factors. Predictors of adverse outcomes in relation to grand multiparous women were assessed at p = 0.05. Results Grand multiparas had twice the likelihood of malpresentation and a threefold higher prevalence of meconium-stained liquor and placenta previa compared with lower-parity women even when adjusted for age. Neonates delivered by grand multiparous women (12.1%) were at three-time greater risk of a low Apgar score compared with lower-parity women (5.4%) (odds ratio (OR), 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5–5.0). Grand multiparity and low birth weight were independently associated with a low Apgar score (OR, 2.4; 95%, CI 1.4–4.2 for GM; OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.3–7.8) for low birth weight. Conclusion Grand multiparity remains a risk in pregnancy and is associated with an increased prevalence of maternal and neonatal complications (malpresentation, meconium-stained liquor, placenta previa and a low Apgar score) compared with other multiparous women who delivered at Muhimbili National Hospital

Comparison of common adverse neonatal outcomes among preterm and term infants at the National Referral Hospital in Tanzania: a case-control study

Background: Neonatal period is a critical period in a child’s heath because it is associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess common adverse health outcomes and compare the risk of such outcomes between preterm and term neonates, in Tanzania. Methods: This was a case-control study involving infants admitted at Muhimbili National Hospital between August and October 2020. About 222 pairs of preterm and term infants were followed until discharge. Logistic regression was used to compare risk of health outcomes. Statistical significance was achieved at p–value < 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. Result: Preterm neonates had increased risk of mortality (OR = 7.2, 95% CI: 3.4-15.1), apnea (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 3.4 – 15.1), respiratory distress syndrome (OR = 10.9, 95% CI: 6.1 – 19.6), necrotizing enterocolitis (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.2 – 25.3), anemia (OR = 4.3, 95% CI: 2.8 – 6.6), pneumonia (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.6 – 4.6) and sepsis (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7 – 3.9). No difference in risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus and jaundice was observed. Conclusion: For promoting neonates' health, prevention and treatment of the higher risk adverse neonatal outcomes should be prioritized

"We do what we can do to save a woman" health workers' perceptions of health facility readiness for management of postpartum haemorrhage.

Background: In many low-resource settings, in-service training is a common strategy to improve the performance of health workers and ultimately reduce the persistent burden of maternal mortality and morbidities. An evaluation of the Helping Mothers Survive Bleeding After Birth (HMS BAB) training as a single-component intervention in Tanzania found some positive albeit limited effect on clinical management and reduction of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).Aim: In order to better understand these findings, and particularly the contribution of contextual factors on the observed effects, we explored health workers' perceptions of their health facilities' readiness to provide PPH care.Methods: We conducted 7 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) in purposively selected intervention districts in the HMS BAB trial. FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded, transcribed and translated verbatim. Thematic analysis, using both inductive and deductive approaches, was applied with the help of MAXQDA software.Results: Health workers perceive that their facilities have a low readiness to provide PPH care, leading to stressful situations and suboptimal clinical management. They describe inconsistencies in essential supplies, fluctuating availability of blood for transfusion, and ineffective referral system. In addition, there are challenges in collaboration, communication and leadership support, which is perceived to prevent effective management of cases within the facility as well as in referral situations. Health workers strive to provide life-saving care to women with PPH despite the perceived challenges. In some health facilities, health workers perceive supportive clinical leadership as motivating in providing good care.Conclusion: The potential positive effects of single-component interventions such as HMS BAB training on clinical outcome may be constraint by poor health facility readiness, including communication, leadership and referral processes that need to be addressed

Criteria-based audit on management of eclampsia patients at a tertiary hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

\ud Criteria-based audits have been used to improve clinical management in developed countries, but have only recently been introduced in the developing world. This study discusses the introduction of a criteria-based audit in a tertiary hospital in an African setting, assesses the quality of care among eclampsia patients and discusses possible interventions in order to improve the quality of care. We conducted a criteria based audit of 389 eclampsia patients admitted to Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Dar es Salaam Tanzania between April 14, 2006 and December 31, 2006. Cases were assessed using evidence-based criteria for appropriate care. Antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum eclampsia constituted 47%, 41% and 12% of the eclampsia cases respectively. Antepartum eclampsia was mostly (73%) preterm whereas the majority (71%) of postpartum eclampsia cases ware at term. The case fatality rate for eclampsia was 7.7%. Medical histories were incomplete, the majority (75%) of management plans were not reviewed by specialists in obstetrics, specialist doctors live far from the hospital and do not spend nights in hospital even when they are on duty, monitoring of patients on magnesium sulphate was inadequate, and important biochemical tests were not routinely done. Two thirds of the patient scheduled for caesarean section did not undergo surgery within agreed time. Potential areas for further improvement in quality of emergency care for eclampsia relate to standardizing management guidelines, greater involvement of specialists in the management of eclampsia and continued medical education on current management of eclampsia for junior staff.\u

Use pattern of maternal health services and determinants of skilled care during delivery in Southern Tanzania: implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets

Almost two decades since the initiation of the Safe motherhood Initiative, Maternal Mortality is still soaring high in most developing countries. In 2000 WHO estimated a life time risk of a maternal death of 1 in 16 in Sub- Saharan Africa while it was only 1 in 2800 in developed countries. This huge discrepancy in the rate of maternal deaths is due to differences in access and use of maternal health care services. It is known that having a skilled attendant at every delivery can lead to marked reductions in maternal mortality. For this reason, the proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel is one of the indicators used to monitor progress towards the achievement of the MDG-5 of improving maternal health. Cross sectional study which employed quantitative research methods. We interviewed 974 women who gave birth within one year prior to the survey. Although almost all (99.8%) attended ANC at least once during their last pregnancy, only 46.7% reported to deliver in a health facility and only 44.5% were assisted during delivery by a skilled attendant. Distance to the health facility (OR = 4.09 (2.72-6.16)), discussion with the male partner on place of delivery (OR = 2.37(1.75-3.22)), advise to deliver in a health facility during ANC (OR = 1.43 (1.25-2.63)) and knowledge of pregnancy risk factors (OR 2.95 (1.65-5.25)) showed significant association with use of skilled care at delivery even after controlling for confounding factors. Use of skilled care during delivery in this district is below the target set by ICPD + of attaining 80% of deliveries attended by skilled personnel by 2005. We recommend the following in order to increase the pace towards achieving the MDG targets: to improve coverage of health facilities, raising awareness for both men and women on danger signs during pregnancy/delivery and strengthening counseling on facility delivery and individual birth preparedness

'How to know what you need to do': a cross-country comparison of maternal health guidelines in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania

Initiatives to raise the quality of care provided to mothers need to be given priority in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). The promotion of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is a common strategy, but their implementation is often challenging, limiting their potential impact. Through a cross-country perspective, this study explored CPGs for maternal health in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Tanzania. The objectives were to compare factors related to CPG use including their content compared with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, their format, and their development processes. Perceptions of their availability and use in practice were also explored. The overall purpose was to further the understanding of how to increase CPGs' potential to improve quality of care for mothers in SSA. The study was a multiple case study design consisting of cross-country comparisons using document review and key informant interviews. A conceptual framework to aid analysis and discussion of results was developed, including selected domains related to guidelines' implementability and use by health workers in practice in terms of usability, applicability, and adaptability. The study revealed few significant differences in content between the national guidelines for maternal health and WHO recommendations. There were, however, marked variations in the format of CPGs between the three countries. Apart from the Ghanaian and one of the Tanzanian CPGs, the levels of both usability and applicability were assessed as low or medium. In all three countries, the use of CPGs by health workers in practice was perceived to be limited. Our cross-country study suggests that it is not poor quality of content or lack of evidence base that constitute the major barrier for CPGs to positively impact on quality improvement in maternal care in SSA. It rather emphasises the need to prioritise the format of guidelines to increase their usability and applicability and to consider these attributes together with implementation strategies as integral to their development processes