5 research outputs found

    How Will You Share Your Work? Creative Commons Bookmarks and Activity Packet

    Get PDF
    These bookmarks and activity packet were created to teach university students about the Creative Commons during the UWM Libraries\u27 celebration of Open Access Week 2015, October 19-25. The bookmarks provide a quick guide to the Creative Commons licenses and can be printed on colored paper. The activity packet is a Halloween-themed paper doll coloring set that includes public domain and CC-BY materials, as well as a full range of Creative Commons licenses. Through coloring, mixing and matching, and other modifications, students can explore the possibilities of open content, engage in remix culture, and practice attributing the work of others. These materials are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

    Visit to BUC 2019

    No full text
    Hesburgh Libraries Visit to BUC July-Aug 201

    A Mismatched Group of Items That I Would Not Find Particularly Interesting: Challenges and Opportunities with Digital Exhibits and Collections Labels

    No full text
    Objective – The authors sought to identify link language that is user-friendly and sufficiently disambiguates between a digital collection and digital exhibit platform for users from a R1 institution, or a university with high research activity and doctoral programs as classified in the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Methods – The authors distributed two online surveys using a modified open card sort and reverse-category test via university electronic mailing lists to undergraduate and graduate students to learn what language they would use to identify groups of items and to test their understanding of link labels that point to digitized cultural heritage items. Results – Our study uncovered that the link terms utilized by cultural heritage institutions are not uniformly understood by our users. Terms that are frequently used interchangeably (i.e., Digital Collections, Digital Project, and Digital Exhibit) can be too generic to be meaningful for different user groups. Conclusion – Because the link terms utilized by cultural heritage institutions were not uniformly understood by our users, the most user-friendly way to link to these resources is to use the term we—librarians, curators, and archivists—think is most accurate as the link text based on our professional knowledge and provide a brief description of what each site contains in order to provide necessary context

    A Genealogy of Refusal: Walking Away from Crisis and Scarcity Narratives

    No full text
    Why can’t librarians “Just Say No”? To answer this question, we look at workplace refusal through the fine arts, literature, and popular culture to construct a genealogy of workplace refusal. In it, we also begin to trace a lineage of crisis narrative critique alongside the library profession’s inheritance of vocational awe. We explore the librarian’s role and voice through the lens of both popular culture and academic publications. In our companion multimedia, hypertextual Scalar project also titled A Genealogy of Refusal: Walking Away from Crisis and Scarcity Narratives, we contextualize strategies of refusal in libraries through critical response to and annotations of film clips and illustrations. We examine gender differences in portrayals of workplace refusal. We laugh when in Parks and Recreation a stereotypical librarian ignores a stripper but warns noisy patrons: “Shh—This is a library!” We are horrified when aspiring librarians in Morgenstern’s Starless Sea, hands tied behind their backs, have their tongues torn from their mouths. Elinguation as a job prerequisite? No, thanks. The implications of saying “No” are many. We explicate ways librarians are made vulnerable by crisis narratives and constructed scarcity. We advocate for asset framing and developing fluencies in hearing and saying “No.” Looking forward, how long will it take librarians to reclaim “Yes” in a way that works for us?Pourquoi les bibliothécaires ne peuvent pas être en « refus global » ? Pour répondre à cette question, nous examinons le refus en milieu de travail à travers les beaux-arts, la littérature et la culture populaire pour construire une généalogie du refus en milieu de travail. Dans ce geste, nous entamons également la tracée d'une généalogie de critiques narratives de crise aux côtés de l'héritage de la révérence vocationnelle (vocational awe) du métier de bibliothécaire. Nous explorons les rôles et la voix des bibliothécaires à travers le prisme de la culture populaire et des publications universitaires. Dans le projet Scalar hypertextuel et multimédia qui accompagne ce texte (également intitulé A Genealogy of Refusal: Walking Away from Crisis and Scarcity Narratives (Une généalogie du refus : abandonner des récits de crise et de rareté), nous contextualisons les stratégies de refus dans les bibliothèques à travers une réponse critique et des annotations de clips de films et d'illustrations. Nous analysons les différences genrées dans les représentations du refus en milieu de travail. On rigole quand dans Parcs et Loisirs une bibliothécaire stéréotypée ignore une strip-teaseuse mais réprimande les usagèr.e.s bruyant.e.s : « Chut !!!! - On est dans une bibliothèque ! » Nous sommes horrifiées lorsque dans La Mer sans étoiles de Morgenstern des bibliothécaires en herbe se font attacher les mains derrière le dos et arracher la langue. L'élinguation comme exigence professionnelle ? Non, merci. Les conséquences du refus sont nombreuses. Nous justifions comment les bibliothécaires sont rendu.e.s vulnérables par les récits de crise et la rareté calculée. Nous défendons la reconnaissance des acquis et le développement de l'aisance à entendre et exprimer le refus. Dans l'avenir, combien de temps faudra-t-il aux bibliothécaires pour réclamer un « oui » qui nous serve 
    corecore