24 research outputs found

    miRNA-Dependent Translational Repression in the Drosophila Ovary

    Get PDF
    Background: The Drosophila ovary is a tissue rich in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Many of the regulatory factors are proteins identified via genetic screens. The more recent discovery of microRNAs, which in other animals and tissues appear to regulate translation of a large fraction of all mRNAs, raised the possibility that they too might act during oogenesis. However, there has been no direct demonstration of microRNA-dependent translational repression in the ovary. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here, quantitative analyses of transcript and protein levels of transgenes with or without synthetic miR-312 binding sites show that the binding sites do confer translational repression. This effect is dependent on the ability of the cells to produce microRNAs. By comparison with microRNA-dependent translational repression in other cell types, the regulated mRNAs and the protein factors that mediate repression were expected to be enriched in sponge bodies, subcellular structures with extensive similarities to the P bodies found in other cells. However, no such enrichment was observed. Conclusions/Significance: Our results reveal the variety of post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that operate in the Drosophila ovary, and have implications for the mechanisms of miRNA-dependent translational control used in the ovary.This work was supported in part by NIH grant GM54409 and in part by Research Grant No. 1-FY08-445. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Cellular and Molecular Biolog

    Maf1, a New Player in the Regulation of Human RNA Polymerase III Transcription

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Human RNA polymerase III (pol III) transcription is regulated by several factors, including the tumor suppressors P53 and Rb, and the proto-oncogene c-Myc. In yeast, which lacks these proteins, a central regulator of pol III transcription, called Maf1, has been described. Maf1 is required for repression of pol III transcription in response to several signal transduction pathways and is broadly conserved in eukaryotes. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We show that human endogenous Maf1 can be co-immunoprecipitated with pol III and associates in vitro with two pol III subunits, the largest subunit RPC1 and the α-like subunit RPAC2. Maf1 represses pol III transcription in vitro and in vivo and is required for maximal pol III repression after exposure to MMS or rapamycin, treatments that both lead to Maf1 dephosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that Maf1 is a major regulator of pol III transcription in human cells

    A Candidate Approach Implicates the Secreted Salmonella Effector Protein SpvB in P-Body Disassembly

    Get PDF
    P-bodies are dynamic aggregates of RNA and proteins involved in several post-transcriptional regulation processes. P-bodies have been shown to play important roles in regulating viral infection, whereas their interplay with bacterial pathogens, specifically intracellular bacteria that extensively manipulate host cell pathways, remains unknown. Here, we report that Salmonella infection induces P-body disassembly in a cell type-specific manner, and independently of previously characterized pathways such as inhibition of host cell RNA synthesis or microRNA-mediated gene silencing. We show that the Salmonella-induced P-body disassembly depends on the activation of the SPI-2 encoded type 3 secretion system, and that the secreted effector protein SpvB plays a major role in this process. P-body disruption is also induced by the related pathogen, Shigella flexneri, arguing that this might be a new mechanism by which intracellular bacterial pathogens subvert host cell function

    Mathematical modeling of microRNA-mediated mechanisms of translation repression

    Full text link
    MicroRNAs can affect the protein translation using nine mechanistically different mechanisms, including repression of initiation and degradation of the transcript. There is a hot debate in the current literature about which mechanism and in which situations has a dominant role in living cells. The worst, same experimental systems dealing with the same pairs of mRNA and miRNA can provide ambiguous evidences about which is the actual mechanism of translation repression observed in the experiment. We start with reviewing the current knowledge of various mechanisms of miRNA action and suggest that mathematical modeling can help resolving some of the controversial interpretations. We describe three simple mathematical models of miRNA translation that can be used as tools in interpreting the experimental data on the dynamics of protein synthesis. The most complex model developed by us includes all known mechanisms of miRNA action. It allowed us to study possible dynamical patterns corresponding to different miRNA-mediated mechanisms of translation repression and to suggest concrete recipes on determining the dominant mechanism of miRNA action in the form of kinetic signatures. Using computational experiments and systematizing existing evidences from the literature, we justify a hypothesis about co-existence of distinct miRNA-mediated mechanisms of translation repression. The actually observed mechanism will be that acting on or changing the limiting "place" of the translation process. The limiting place can vary from one experimental setting to another. This model explains the majority of existing controversies reported.Comment: 40 pages, 9 figures, 4 tables, 91 cited reference. The analysis of kinetic signatures is updated according to the new model of coupled transcription, translation and degradation, and of miRNA-based regulation of this process published recently (arXiv:1204.5941). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0911.179

    The panorama of miRNA-mediated mechanisms in mammalian cells

    Get PDF

    Identification of a lectin causing the degeneration of neuronal processes using engineered embryonic stem cells

    No full text
    Unlike the mechanisms involved in the death of neuronal cell bodies, those causing the elimination of processes are not well understood owing to the lack of suitable experimental systems. As the neurotrophin receptor p75(NTR) is known to restrict the growth of neuronal processes, we engineered mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to express an Ngfr (p75(NTR)) cDNA under the control of the Mapt locus (the gene encoding tau), which begins to be active when ES cell-derived progenitors start elongating processes. This caused a progressive, synchronous degeneration of all processes, and a prospective proteomic analysis showed increased levels of the sugar-binding protein galectin-1 in the p75(NTR)-engineered cells. Function-blocking galectin-1 antibodies prevented the degeneration of processes, and recombinant galectin-1 caused the processes of wild-type neurons to degenerate first, followed by the cell bodies. In vivo, the application of a glutamate receptor agonist, a maneuver known to upregulate p75(NTR), led to an increase in the amount of galectin-1 and to the degeneration of neurons and their processes in a galectin-1-dependent fashion. Section of the sciatic nerve also rapidly upregulated levels of p75(NTR) and galectin-1 in terminal Schwann cells, and the elimination of nerve endings was delayed at the neuromuscular junction of mice lacking Lgals1 (the gene encoding galectin-1). These results indicate that galectin-1 actively participates in the elimination of neuronal processes after lesion, and that engineered ES cells are a useful tool for studying relevant aspects of neuronal degeneration that have been hitherto difficult to analyze
    corecore