Frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer in general practice: a cross-sectional study

Evidence on the frequency of a positive family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) among individuals aged <55 years is lacking. General practice setting might be well suited for the identification of individuals in this above-average risk group.; To determine the frequency of a reported positive family history of CRC among patients aged 40 to 54 years in a general practice setting.; We conducted a cross-sectional study in 21 general practices in Germany. Patients aged 40 to 54 years were identified by means of the practice software and interviewed by health care assistants using a standardized four-item questionnaire. Outcome was occurrence of a positive family history of CRC, defined as at least one first-degree relative (FDR: parents, siblings, or children) with CRC. Further measurements were FDRs with CRC / colorectal polyps (adenomas) diagnosed before the age of 50 and occurrence of three or more relatives with colorectal, stomach, cervical, ovarian, urethel or renal pelvic cancer.; Out of 6723 participants, 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6% to 7.8%) reported at least one FDR with CRC and 1.2% (95% CI 0.9% to 1.5%) reported FDRs with CRC diagnosed before the age of 50. A further 2.6% (95% CI 2.3% to 3.0%) reported colorectal polyps in FDRs diagnosed before the age of 50 and 2.1% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.5%) reported three or more relatives with entities mentioned above.; One in 14 patients reported at least one FDR with CRC. General practice should be considered when defining requirements of risk-adapted CRC screening

Quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in five European countries.

Little is known about the relationship between specific subtypes of treatment-associated motor complications and different domains of health-related Quality of Life (QoL) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Larger studies that investigate these aspects within a cross-cultural setting are scarce

Short- and long-term agreement and reproducibility of 48-hours intraocular pressure measurements in glaucoma patients

Background!#!Glaucomatous eyes often show strong intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations and individual measurements at different time points are necessary for personalized therapy. To survey IOP variations 48-hours diurnal and nocturnal IOP measurements were performed on two consecutive days. Aims of this study were to investigate the short-term repeatability of 48-hours measurements within one patient's IOP profile and long-term repeatability between two separate IOP profiles of the same patient.!##!Methods!#!A retrospective cohort study was performed evaluating data of 90 glaucoma patients in a German university medical center between 2006 and 2013. All patients underwent two separate diurnal IOP profiles of 48 h. IOP was measured at 8 am, 2 pm, 6 pm, 9 pm using Goldmann applanation tonometry and at 12 midnight using Perkins tonometry in supine position on two consecutive days. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to evaluate agreement for the same time points (each time point agreement) and for consecutive measurements within the IOP profiles (between time point agreement). ICC ≤ 0.4 was defined as poor agreement, 0.4-0.75 as moderate and ≥ 0.75 as excellent. Differences between time points were investigated by Bland Altman plots.!##!Results!#!Each time point measurements of profile 1 showed moderate to excellent agreement (ICCs 0.62-0.93). There was a moderate to excellent agreement for measurements between time points of profile 1 (ICCs day one 0.57-0.86, day two 0.71-0.90). Profile 2 was performed at a median interval of 12.0 months (quartiles 11.0 to 21.0). Each time point agreements within profile 2 showed ICCs from 0.23 to 0.81. It showed moderate to excellent agreement for changes between time points (ICCs 0.53-0.94). Day two demonstrated ICCs from 0.74 to 0.88. Long term IOP repeatability (over both pressure profiles) showed moderate to good agreement (ICCs 0.39-0.67).!##!Conclusions!#!Short and long-term agreement of IOP measurements evaluated by diurnal IOP profiles is moderate to good. Due to mostly moderate agreements, which we believe represent IOP fluctuations, we conclude that it is necessary to perform 48-hours IOP profiles to gain a better overview of the individual IOP fluctuations

Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study

Although the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is 2-4 times higher in case of a positive family history, risk-adapted screening programs for family members related to CRC- patients do not exist in the German health care system. CRC screening recommendations for persons under 55 years of age that have a family predisposition have been published in several guidelines. The primary aim of this study is to determine the frequency of positive family history of CRC (1st degree relatives with CRC) among 40-54 year old persons in a general practitioner (GP) setting in Germany. Secondary aims are to detect the frequency of occurrence of colorectal neoplasms (CRC and advanced adenomas) in 1st degree relatives of CRC patients and to identify the variables (e.g. demographic, genetic, epigenetic and proteomic characteristics) that are associated with it. This study also explores whether evidence-based information contributes to informed decisions and how screening participation correlates with anxiety and (anticipated) regret.; Prior to the beginning of the study, the GP team (GP and one health care assistant) in around 50 practices will be trained, and about 8,750 persons that are registered with them will be asked to complete the "Network against colorectal cancer" questionnaire. The 10% who are expected to have a positive family history will then be invited to give their informed consent to participate in the study. All individuals with positive family history will be provided with evidence-based information and prevention strategies. We plan to examine each participant's family history of CRC in detail and to collect information on further variables (e.g. demographics) associated with increased risk. Additional stool and blood samples will be collected from study-participants who decide to undergo a colonoscopy (n ~ 350) and then analyzed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg to see whether further relevant variables are associated with an increased risk of CRC. One screening list and four questionnaires will be used to collect the data, and a detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided before the database is closed (expected to be June 30, 2015).; It is anticipated that when persons with a family history of colorectal cancer have been provided with professional advice by the practice team, there will be an increase in the availability of valid information on the frequency of affected individuals and an increase in the number of persons making informed decisions. We also expect to identify further variables that are associated with colorectal cancer. This study therefore has translational relevance from lab to practice.; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006277

Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt] : study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study

Background: Although the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is 2-4 times higher in case of a positive family history, risk-adapted screening programs for family members related to CRC- patients do not exist in the German health care system. CRC screening recommendations for persons under 55 years of age that have a family predisposition have been published in several guidelines. The primary aim of this study is to determine the frequency of positive family history of CRC (1st degree relatives with CRC) among 40–54 year old persons in a general practitioner (GP) setting in Germany. Secondary aims are to detect the frequency of occurrence of colorectal neoplasms (CRC and advanced adenomas) in 1st degree relatives of CRC patients and to identify the variables (e.g. demographic, genetic, epigenetic and proteomic characteristics) that are associated with it. This study also explores whether evidence-based information contributes to informed decisions and how screening participation correlates with anxiety and (anticipated) regret. Methods/Design: Prior to the beginning of the study, the GP team (GP and one health care assistant) in around 50 practices will be trained, and about 8,750 persons that are registered with them will be asked to complete the “Network against colorectal cancer” questionnaire. The 10 % who are expected to have a positive family history will then be invited to give their informed consent to participate in the study. All individuals with positive family history will be provided with evidence-based information and prevention strategies. We plan to examine each participant’s family history of CRC in detail and to collect information on further variables (e.g. demographics) associated with increased risk. Additional stool and blood samples will be collected from study-participants who decide to undergo a colonoscopy (n ~ 350) and then analyzed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg to see whether further relevant variables are associated with an increased risk of CRC. One screening list and four questionnaires will be used to collect the data, and a detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided before the database is closed (expected to be June 30, 2015). Discussion: It is anticipated that when persons with a family history of colorectal cancer have been provided with professional advice by the practice team, there will be an increase in the availability of valid information on the frequency of affected individuals and an increase in the number of persons making informed decisions. We also expect to identify further variables that are associated with colorectal cancer. This study therefore has translational relevance from lab to practice. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS0000627

Returning to work in lung cancer survivors—a multi-center cross-sectional study in Germany

Purpose!#!To investigate the work situation of lung cancer survivors and to identify the factors associated with their returning to work.!##!Methods!#!Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate study population characteristics and independent factors of subsequently returning to work. To analyze time to return to work, Cox regression was used.!##!Results!#!The study sample included 232 lung cancer survivors of working age from 717 enrolled participants in the multi-center cross-sectional LARIS (Quality of Life and Psychosocial Rehabilitation in Lung Cancer Survivors) study. About 67% of the survivors were not employed during the survey. More than 51% of the survivors who were employed before their illness did not return to their work. The survivors who had returned to their careers were younger, associated with higher household income, lower fatigue score, and stable relationship and vocational training. Patients who received social service counseling showed a higher chance of regaining their career.!##!Conclusions!#!Lung cancer survivors were found to be associated with a high risk of unemployment and very low professional reintegration after interruption due to illness. More comprehensive studies are needed to support lung cancer survivors and targeting of patients in need of special attention in rehabilitation that would benefit from the findings in the present study

Leadership decision making at a time of rapid reform: An English Case Study

This paper explores the decision making process of a school leadership team at a time of rapid educational reform using Bourdieu’s thinking tools of field, capital and habitus. The context of educational policy making is viewed as a field, a site in which schools in England struggle for symbolic capital from within the policy arena. Initial findings of this historically successful case study school is that the perceptions of school leaders indicate a) the field of educational policy is in flux and the decision making reveals the habitus of the head teacher to seize the pragmatic opportunity to increase symbolic capital within the field by converting into an academy, b) that whilst there is an element of risk taking involved in this decision to become an autonomous institution operating outside of local authority of control this is outweighed by the promises autonomy will bring to develop a new model for delivery of education provision. As such the school leaders c) recognise the hierarchy of power in the field and base their decision making upon the desire to protect their school’s interests and to increase their capital and position within the field by gaining official recognition from the policy actors within the field. Thus the on-going policy codification of ‘new practices and old hierarchies in the field’ is a powerful way to understand how school leaders interpret policy and position themselves and the school in relation to current educational reform. The case study illustrates that the on-going struggle within and across the symbolic economy of educational reform is encouraging school leaders to respond and behave in certain ways, to second-guess in the wake of centralised decentralisation. However that drive to conform is motivated by their knowledge of the specific context in which the school operates and thus decisions are made which first and foremost respond to the local need, interest and intake of their students. Thus the study shows that the school leaders are engaged with viewing the positive possibilities made available through reform processes and that the potential for remodelling school structures through the academies programme in England offers an opportunity for school leaders to innovate within a centrally recognised and endorsed framework