4,877 research outputs found
Statistical characterization of roughness uncertainty and impact on wind resource estimation
In this work we relate uncertainty in background roughness length (z0) to
uncertainty in wind speeds, where the latter are predicted at a wind farm
location based on wind statistics observed at a different site. Sensitivity
of predicted winds to roughness is derived analytically for the
industry-standard European Wind Atlas method, which is based on the
geostrophic drag law. We statistically consider roughness and its
corresponding uncertainty, in terms of both z0 derived from measured wind
speeds as well as that chosen in practice by wind engineers. We show the
combined effect of roughness uncertainty arising from differing
wind-observation and turbine-prediction sites; this is done for the case of
roughness bias as well as for the general case. For estimation of
uncertainty in annual energy production (AEP), we also develop a generalized
analytical turbine power curve, from which we derive a relation between mean
wind speed and AEP. Following our developments, we provide guidance on
approximate roughness uncertainty magnitudes to be expected in industry
practice, and we also find that sites with larger background roughness incur
relatively larger uncertainties
From standard wind measurements to spectral characterization: turbulence length scale and distribution
In wind energy, the effect of turbulence upon turbines is typically
simulated using wind input time series based on turbulence spectra. The
velocity components' spectra are characterized by the amplitude of turbulent
fluctuations, as well as the length scale corresponding to the dominant
eddies. Following the IEC standard, turbine load calculations commonly
involve use of the Mann spectral-tensor model to generate time series of the
turbulent three-dimensional velocity field. In practice, this spectral-tensor
model is employed by adjusting its three parameters: the dominant turbulence
length scale LMM (peak length scale of an undistorted isotropic velocity spectrum), the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic
energy ξ, and the turbulent eddy-lifetime (anisotropy)
parameter Î. Deviation from ideal neutral sheared turbulence â
i.e., for non-zero heat flux and/or heights above the surface layer â is, in
effect, captured by setting these parameters according to observations.Previously, site-specific {LMM,âÎľ,âÎ} values were
obtainable through fits to measured three-dimensional velocity component
spectra recorded with sample rates resolving the inertial range of
turbulence (âł1 Hz); however, this is not feasible in most
industrial wind energy projects, which lack multi-dimensional sonic
anemometers and employ loggers that record measurements averaged over
intervals of minutes. Here a form is derived for the shear dependence implied
by the eddy-lifetime prescription within the Mann spectral-tensor model,
which leads to derivation of useful forms of the turbulence length scale.
Subsequently it is shown how LMM can be calculated from
commonly measured site-specific atmospheric parameters, namely mean wind
shear (dUâdz) and standard deviation of streamwise
fluctuations (Ďu). The derived LMM can be obtained from standard (10 min average) cup anemometer measurements, in contrast with an earlier form based on friction velocity.The new form is tested across several different conditions and sites, and it is found to be more robust and accurate than estimates relying on friction
velocity observations. Assumptions behind the derivations are also tested,
giving new insight into rapid-distortion theory and eddy-lifetime modeling â
and application â within the atmospheric boundary layer. The work herein
further shows that distributions of turbulence length scale, obtained using
the new form with typical measurements, compare well with distributions
P(LMM) obtained by fitting to spectra from research-grade sonic anemometer measurements for the various flow regimes and sites analyzed. The new form is thus motivated by and amenable to site-specific probabilistic loads characterization.</p
- âŚ