How a supply-side intervention can help to increase caesarean section rates in Burkina Faso facilities-Evidence from an interrupted time-series analysis using routine health data.

OBJECTIVES: In Burkina Faso, only 2.1% of women give birth by caesarean section (CS). To improve the use of maternal health services during pregnancy and childbirth, many interventions were implemented during the 2010s including performance-based financing (PBF) and a free maternal health care policy (the gratuité). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a supply-side intervention (PBF) combined with a demand-side intervention (gratuité) on institutional CS rates in Burkina Faso. METHODS: We used routine health data from all the public health facilities in 21 districts (10 that implemented PBF and 11 that did not) from January 2013 to September 2017. We analysed CS rates as the proportion of CS performed out of all facility-based deliveries (FBD) that occurred in the district. We performed an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to evaluate the impact of PBF alone and then in conjunction with the gratuité on institutional CS rates. RESULTS: CS rates in Burkina Faso increased slightly between January 2013 and September 2017 in all districts. After the introduction of PBF, the increase of CS rates was higher in intervention than in non-intervention districts. However, after the introduction of the gratuité, CS rates decreased in all districts, independently of the PBF intervention. CONCLUSION: In 2017, despite high FBD rates in Burkina Faso as well as the PBF intervention and the gratuité, less than 3% of women who gave birth in a health facility did so by CS. Our study shows that the positive PBF effects were not sustained in a context of user fee exemption

How a supply‐side intervention can help to increase caesarean section rates in Burkina Faso facilities—Evidence from an interrupted time‐series analysis using routine health data

Objectives: In Burkina Faso, only 2.1% of women give birth by caesarean section (CS). To improve the use of maternal health services during pregnancy and childbirth, many interventions were implemented during the 2010s including performance-based financing (PBF) and a free maternal health care policy (the gratuité). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a supply-side intervention (PBF) combined with a demand-side intervention (gratuité) on institutional CS rates in Burkina Faso. Methods: We used routine health data from all the public health facilities in 21 districts (10 that implemented PBF and 11 that did not) from January 2013 to September 2017. We analysed CS rates as the proportion of CS performed out of all facility-based deliveries (FBD) that occurred in the district. We performed an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to evaluate the impact of PBF alone and then in conjunction with the gratuité on institutional CS rates. Results: CS rates in Burkina Faso increased slightly between January 2013 and September 2017 in all districts. After the introduction of PBF, the increase of CS rates was higher in intervention than in non-intervention districts. However, after the introduction of the gratuité, CS rates decreased in all districts, independently of the PBF intervention. Conclusion: In 2017, despite high FBD rates in Burkina Faso as well as the PBF intervention and the gratuité, less than 3% of women who gave birth in a health facility did so by CS. Our study shows that the positive PBF effects were not sustained in a context of user fee exemption

How a supply‐side intervention can help to increase caesarean section rates in Burkina Faso facilities—Evidence from an interrupted time‐series analysis using routine health data

Objectives: In Burkina Faso, only 2.1% of women give birth by caesarean section (CS). To improve the use of maternal health services during pregnancy and childbirth, many interventions were implemented during the 2010s including performance‐based financing (PBF) and a free maternal health care policy (the gratuité). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a supply‐side intervention (PBF) combined with a demand‐side intervention (gratuité) on institutional CS rates in Burkina Faso. Methods: We used routine health data from all the public health facilities in 21 districts (10 that implemented PBF and 11 that did not) from January 2013 to September 2017. We analysed CS rates as the proportion of CS performed out of all facility‐based deliveries (FBD) that occurred in the district. We performed an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to evaluate the impact of PBF alone and then in conjunction with the gratuité on institutional CS rates. Results: CS rates in Burkina Faso increased slightly between January 2013 and September 2017 in all districts. After the introduction of PBF, the increase of CS rates was higher in intervention than in non‐intervention districts. However, after the introduction of the gratuité, CS rates decreased in all districts, independently of the PBF intervention. Conclusion: In 2017, despite high FBD rates in Burkina Faso as well as the PBF intervention and the gratuité, less than 3% of women who gave birth in a health facility did so by CS. Our study shows that the positive PBF effects were not sustained in a context of user fee exemption

Do Surgeons Anticipate Women’s Hopes and Fears Associated with Prolapse Repair? A Qualitative Analysis in the PROSPERE Trial

Women’s preoperative perceptions of pelvic-floor disorders may differ from those of their physicians. Our objective was to specify women’s hopes and fears before cystocele repair, and to compare them to those that surgeons anticipate. We performed a secondary qualitative analysis of data from the PROSPERE trial. Among the 265 women included, 98% reported at least one hope and 86% one fear before surgery. Sixteen surgeons also completed the free expectations-questionnaire as a typical patient would. Women’s hopes covered seven themes, and women’s fears eleven. Women’s hopes were concerning prolapse repair (60%), improvement of urinary function (39%), capacity for physical activities (28%), sexual function (27%), well-being (25%), and end of pain or heaviness (19%). Women’s fears were concerning prolapse relapse (38%), perioperative concerns (28%), urinary disorders (26%), pain (19%), sexual problems (10%), and physical impairment (6%). Surgeons anticipated typical hopes and fears which were very similar to those the majority of women reported. However, only 60% of the women reported prolapse repair as an expectation. Women’s expectations appear reasonable and consistent with the scientific literature on the improvement and the risk of relapse or complication related to cystocele repair. Our analysis encourages surgeons to consider individual woman’s expectations before pelvic-floor repair

Forfait obstétrical et inégalités dans l'accès aux soins maternels en Mauritanie

International audienceLa Mauritanie a introduit en 2002 un système de prépaiement des soins de santé maternelle, le forfait obstétrical. L'objectif de cette étude est de savoir si le forfait améliore la qualité de l'accès et réduit les inégalités dans le recours aux soins obstétricaux. Les données sont celles de l'enquête ménages MICS-Mauritanie de 2015. Deux méthodes ont été utilisées. La première est la méthode des indices de concentration. La seconde est la méthode de décomposition des inégalités par fonction d'influence recentrée qui estime des effets marginaux en tenant compte des caractéristiques des individus. Le forfait obstétrical permet aux femmes enceintes d'accéder à des soins de meilleure qualité et contribue à la réduction des inégalités d'accès

Forfait obstétrical et inégalités dans l'accès aux soins maternels en Mauritanie

International audienc

How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND:Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women's demand for caesarean sections. QUESTION:The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe the methodologies, outcomes, country characteristics and country income levels in these studies. METHODS:This is a systematic review of studies published between 2000 and 2017 in French and English that quantitatively measured women's demand for caesarean sections. We carried out a systematic search using the Medline database in PubMed. FINDINGS:The search strategy identified 390 studies, 41 of which met the final inclusion criteria, representing a total sample of 3 774 458 women. We identified two different study designs, i.e., cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, that are commonly used to measure social demand for caesarean sections. Two different types of outcomes were reported, i.e., the preferences of pregnant or non-pregnant women regarding the method of childbirth in the future and caesarean delivery following maternal request. No study measured demand for caesarean section during the childbirth process. All included studies were conducted in middle- (n = 24) and high-income countries (n = 17), and no study performed in a low-income country was found. DISCUSSION:Measuring caesarean section demand is challenging, and the structural violence leading to demand for caesarean section during childbirth while in the labour ward remains invisible. In addition, the caesarean section demand in low-income countries remains unclear due to the lack of studies conducted in these countries. CONCLUSION:We recommend conducting prospective cohort studies to describe the social construction of caesarean section demand. We also recommend conducting studies in low-income countries because demand for caesarean sections in these countries is rarely investigated

Removing user fees to improve access to caesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental evaluation in western Africa

International audienceIntroduction Mali and Benin introduced a user feeexemption policy focused on caesarean sections in 2005and 2009, respectively. The objective of this study is toassess the impact of this policy on service utilisation andneonatal outcomes. We focus specifically on whether thepolicy differentially impacts women by education level,zone of residence and wealth quintile of the household.Methods We use a difference-in-differences approachusing two other western African countries with no feeexemption policies as the comparison group (Cameroonand Nigeria). Data were extracted from Demographic andHealth Surveys over four periods between the early 1990sand the early 2000s. We assess the impact of the policy onthree outcomes: caesarean delivery, facility-based deliveryand neonatal mortality.Results We analyse 99 800 childbirths. The freecaesarean policy had a positive impact on caesareansection rates (adjusted OR=1.36 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.66;P≤0.01), particularly in non-educated women (adjustedOR=2.71; 95% CI 1.70 to 4.32; P≤0.001), those livingin rural areas (adjusted OR=2.02; 95% CI 1.48 to 2.76;P≤0.001) and women in the middle-class wealth index(adjusted OR=3.88; 95% CI 1.77 to 4.72; P≤0.001). Thepolicy contributes to the increase in the proportion offacility-based delivery (adjusted OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.48 to1.89; P≤0.001) and may also contribute to the decreaseof neonatal mortality (adjusted OR=0.70; 95% CI 0.58 to0.85; P≤0.001).Conclusion This study is the first to evaluate the impactof a user fee exemption policy focused on caesareansections on maternal and child health outcomes withrobust methods. It provides evidence that eliminating feesfor caesareans benefits both women and neonates in sub-Saharan countries

Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?

International audienceBackground: Benin and Mali introduced user fee exemption policies focused on caesarean sections (C-sections) in2005 and 2009, respectively. These policies had a positive impact on access to C-sections and facility based deliveriesamong all women, but the impact on socioeconomic inequality is still highly uncertain. The objective of this study wasto observe whether there was an increase or a decrease in urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in access toC-sections and facility based deliveries after the free C-section policy was introduced.Methods: We used data from three consecutive Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS): 2001, 2006 and 2011–2012 inBenin and 2001, 2006 and 2012–13 in Mali. We evaluated trends in inequality in terms of two outcomes: C-sections andfacility based deliveries. Adjusted odds ratios were used to estimate whether the distributions of C-sections and facilitybased deliveries favoured the least advantaged categories (rural, non-educated and poorest women) or the mostadvantaged categories (urban, educated and richest women). Concentration curves were used to observe the degreeof wealth-related inequality in access to C-sections and facility based deliveries.Results: We analysed 47,302 childbirths (23,266 in Benin and 24,036 in Mali). In Benin, we found no significantdifference in access to C-sections between urban and rural women or between educated and non-educated women.However, the richest women had greater access to C-sections than the poorest women. There was no significantchange in these inequalities in terms of access to C-sections and facility based deliveries after introduction of the freeC-section policy.In Mali, we found a reduction in education-related inequalities in access to C-sections after implementation of thepolicy (p-value = 0.043). Inequalities between urban and rural areas had already decreased prior to implementation ofthe policy, but wealth-related inequalities were still present.Conclusions: Urban/rural and socioeconomic inequalities in C-section access did not change substantially after thecountries implemented free C-section policies. User fee exemption is not enough. We recommend switching tomechanisms that combine both a universal approach and targeted action for vulnerable populations to address thisissue and ensure equal health care access for all individuals