4 research outputs found
Coercive measures in psychiatry and patient rights
Mjere prisile pod kojima podrazumijevamo prisilnu hospitalizaciju, prisilnu medikaciju, sputavanje i izolaciju, prisutne su u psihijatriji od njenih zaÄetaka. Iako nose mnoge moralne i etiÄke dileme, joÅ” se koriste u zbrinjavanju pacijenata s akutnim psihijatrijskim stanjima u kojima pacijenti predstavljaju prijetnju sebi ili drugim osobama. BuduÄi da se mjere prisile sve viÅ”e gledaju kao osjetljivo bioetiÄko problematiziranje i pitanje ljudskih prava, stoga se, osim zakonskim reguliranjem same moguÄnosti uporabe mjera prisile i naÄina na koji ih se može primjenjivati, pravilnicima pokuÅ”avaju uvesti tehnike poput deeskalacije koje bi mogle smanjiti njihovu uporabu. Permanentna bi se edukacija osoblja o usvajanju tih tehnika trebala provoditi ne samo kao moralna, etiÄka i profesionalna obveza, nego i kao zakonski zahtjev u Republici Hrvatskoj.Coercive measures, which include involuntary hospital admission, involuntary medication, restraint and seclusion, have been used in psychiatry since itās beginning. Although those measures come with serious moral and ethical dilemmas, they are still used in management of patient with acute psychiatric illness when patients represent a danger to themselves or to other people. Considering the coercive measures are more then ever seen as a bioethical problem and have come into the focus of sensitive human rights issue,, besides established legal framework for the use of coercive measures, the experts are trying to introduce techniques like deescalation to minimise their use. Permanenet staff education of learning of those techniques ishoul dnot just be moral, ethical and professional obligation, but as also a legal obligation in Croatia
Coercive measures in psychiatry and patient rights
Mjere prisile pod kojima podrazumijevamo prisilnu hospitalizaciju, prisilnu medikaciju, sputavanje i izolaciju, prisutne su u psihijatriji od njenih zaÄetaka. Iako nose mnoge moralne i etiÄke dileme, joÅ” se koriste u zbrinjavanju pacijenata s akutnim psihijatrijskim stanjima u kojima pacijenti predstavljaju prijetnju sebi ili drugim osobama. BuduÄi da se mjere prisile sve viÅ”e gledaju kao osjetljivo bioetiÄko problematiziranje i pitanje ljudskih prava, stoga se, osim zakonskim reguliranjem same moguÄnosti uporabe mjera prisile i naÄina na koji ih se može primjenjivati, pravilnicima pokuÅ”avaju uvesti tehnike poput deeskalacije koje bi mogle smanjiti njihovu uporabu. Permanentna bi se edukacija osoblja o usvajanju tih tehnika trebala provoditi ne samo kao moralna, etiÄka i profesionalna obveza, nego i kao zakonski zahtjev u Republici Hrvatskoj.Coercive measures, which include involuntary hospital admission, involuntary medication, restraint and seclusion, have been used in psychiatry since itās beginning. Although those measures come with serious moral and ethical dilemmas, they are still used in management of patient with acute psychiatric illness when patients represent a danger to themselves or to other people. Considering the coercive measures are more then ever seen as a bioethical problem and have come into the focus of sensitive human rights issue,, besides established legal framework for the use of coercive measures, the experts are trying to introduce techniques like deescalation to minimise their use. Permanenet staff education of learning of those techniques ishoul dnot just be moral, ethical and professional obligation, but as also a legal obligation in Croatia
Parental involvement in the war in Croatia 1991-1995 and suicidality in Croatian male adolescents
Aim To investigate the association between parental war
involvement and different indicators of psychosocial distress
in a community sample of early adolescents ten years
after the war in Croatia 1991-1995.
Methods A total of 695 adolescents were screened with
a self-report questionnaire assessing parental war involvement,
sociodemographic characteristics, and alcohol and
drug consumption. Personality traits were assessed with
the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; depressive
symptoms with the Childrenās Depression Inventory (CDI);
and unintentional injuries, physical fighting, and bullying
with the World Health Organization survey Health Behavior
in School-aged Children. Suicidal ideation was assessed
with three dichotomous items. Suicidal attempts were assessed
with one dichotomous item.
Results Out of 348 boys and 347 girls who were included
in the analysis, 57.7% had at least one veteran parent.
Male children of war veterans had higher rates of unintentional
injuries (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval
[CI], 0.56 to 2.63) and more frequent affirmative responses
across the full suicidal spectrum (thoughts about death ā
OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.02 to 4.3; thoughts about suicide ā OR,
5; 95% CI, 1.72 to 14.66; suicide attempts ā OR, 3.6; 95%
CI, 1.03 to 12.67). In boys, thoughts about suicide and unintentional
injuries were associated with parental war involvement
even after logistic regression. However, girls
were less likely to be affected by parental war involvement,
and only exhibited signs of psychopathology on the CDI
total score.
Conclusion Parental war involvement was associated with
negative psychosocial sequels for male children. This relationship
is possibly mediated by some kind of identification
or secondary traumatization. Suicidality and unintentional
injuries are nonspecific markers for a broad range of
psychosocial distresses, which is why the suggested target
group for preventive interventions should be veteran parents
as vectors of this distress
Coercive measures in psychiatry and patient rights
Mjere prisile pod kojima podrazumijevamo prisilnu hospitalizaciju, prisilnu medikaciju, sputavanje i izolaciju, prisutne su u psihijatriji od njenih zaÄetaka. Iako nose mnoge moralne i etiÄke dileme, joÅ” se koriste u zbrinjavanju pacijenata s akutnim psihijatrijskim stanjima u kojima pacijenti predstavljaju prijetnju sebi ili drugim osobama. BuduÄi da se mjere prisile sve viÅ”e gledaju kao osjetljivo bioetiÄko problematiziranje i pitanje ljudskih prava, stoga se, osim zakonskim reguliranjem same moguÄnosti uporabe mjera prisile i naÄina na koji ih se može primjenjivati, pravilnicima pokuÅ”avaju uvesti tehnike poput deeskalacije koje bi mogle smanjiti njihovu uporabu. Permanentna bi se edukacija osoblja o usvajanju tih tehnika trebala provoditi ne samo kao moralna, etiÄka i profesionalna obveza, nego i kao zakonski zahtjev u Republici Hrvatskoj.Coercive measures, which include involuntary hospital admission, involuntary medication, restraint and seclusion, have been used in psychiatry since itās beginning. Although those measures come with serious moral and ethical dilemmas, they are still used in management of patient with acute psychiatric illness when patients represent a danger to themselves or to other people. Considering the coercive measures are more then ever seen as a bioethical problem and have come into the focus of sensitive human rights issue,, besides established legal framework for the use of coercive measures, the experts are trying to introduce techniques like deescalation to minimise their use. Permanenet staff education of learning of those techniques ishoul dnot just be moral, ethical and professional obligation, but as also a legal obligation in Croatia