Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study Comparing Heparin-induced Platelet Activation Test to 14C-serotonin Release Assay

International audienceAbstract Laboratory confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of crucial importance and remains challenging and relies on platelet functional assays highlighting the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in patient serum or plasma. Platelet functional assays using washed platelets include the 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA), usually described as the gold standard, and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Since its first comparison with SRA there has been no additional published study regarding HIPA diagnostic performances compared with SRA. Aim of our retrospective study was to compare the concordance between HIPA and SRA in HIT suspected-patients with positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies between October 2010 and October 2015. Fifty-five HIT-suspected patients who beneficiated from both HIPA and SRA were included. Positive and negative percent agreements were 83.8% (95% CI 68.0–93.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0–86.7%), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 78.2% (95% CI 65.0–92.2%). Agreement was higher in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal circulation circuit for cardiac surgery. We also confirm that the use of a minimum of 2 platelet donors to establish positive HIT diagnosis and 4 platelet donors to exclude HIT diagnosis allows obtaining a good agreement with SRA. Although HIPA and SRA were performed with different platelet donors and in different laboratories, HIPA had a good positive agreement with SRA for HIT diagnosis, showing that HIPA is a useful functional assay that does not require radioactivity and could be developed worldwide to improve HIT diagnosis

Non-conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with clinical obstetrical APS: prevalence and pregnancies treatment efficacy

International audienceObjectivesTo describe the prevalence of non-conventional APL in patients with obstetrical APS without conventional APL and the impact of treatment on pregnancy outcome.MethodsPatients with clinical obstetrical criteria were tested for anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) IgG/M, anti-prothrombin/phosphatidylserine (anti-PS/PT) IgG/M and anti-annexin V IgG. Pregnancies losses rates were compared between APS, non-conventional APS and non-APL and in untreated pregnancies to treated ones for each group.ResultsUsing the cut-offs (ROC), 65/96 (68%) patients have been considered as non-conventional APS and compared to 83 APS and 31 patients without APL. The obstetrical history in non-conventional APS did not differ in comparison to confirmed APS. The frequencies of anti-annexin V IgG antibodies tended to be more frequent in non-conventional APS (88% versus 73%; p=0.06), and those of anti-PE IgG and M were similar. The anti-PS/PT IgG and M antibodies were more frequent in confirmed APS than in non-conventional APS (63% and 37% versus 4% and 5%, p<0.0001).Overall 261 pregnancies in patients with non-conventional APS were compared to 81 pregnancies of confirmed APS and 132 pregnancies from non-APL group. 136/474 (29%) patients have been treated during pregnancies and treatment significantly increased the rate of live birth (26% in untreated versus 72% in treated pregnancies, p<0.0001). In univariate analyses, treatment effect on pregnancies losses was similar in patients with APS and non-conventional APS, with odds ratio at 3.3 [95% CI; 1.8 to 6.1] and 6.9 [95% CI; 3.9 to 12.3] (p=0.49) and significantly more important for the 2 APS groups pooled versus non-APL group (OR at 1.9 [95% CI; 1.1 to 3.5] for non-APL group versus 5.3 [95% CI; 3.5 to 8.1] for APS groups, p=0.0025).ConclusionIn this study 68% of patients with clinical criteria for obstetrical APS seronegative for conventional APL have non-conventional APL. These patients have a significant decrement of pregnancy losses if they receive treatment for APS during their pregnancy

Interferon Alpha Therapy Increases Pro-Thrombotic Biomarkers in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. Pegylated-interferon alpha (IFN) and hydroxyurea (HU) are commonly used to treat MPN, but their effect on hemostasis has not yet been studied. The aim of our study was to determine whether IFN and HU impact the biological hemostatic profile of MPN patients by studying markers of endothelial, platelet, and coagulation activation. A total of 85 patients (50 polycythemia vera and 35 essential thrombocythemia) were included: 28 treated with IFN, 35 with HU, and 22 with no cytoreductive drug (non-treated, NT). Von Willebrand factor, shear-induced platelet aggregation, factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), fibrinogen, and thrombin generation with and without exogenous thrombomodulin were significantly higher in IFN-treated patients compared to NT patients, while protein S anticoagulant activity was lower. In 10 patients in whom IFN therapy was discontinued, these hemostatic biomarkers returned to the values observed in NT patients, strongly suggesting an impact of IFN therapy on endothelial and coagulation activation. Overall, our study shows that treatment with IFN is associated with significant and reversible effects on the biological hemostatic profile of MPN patients. Whether they could be associated with an increased thrombotic risk remains to be determined in further randomized clinical studies

Exacerbation of thrombo-inflammation by JAK2V617F mutation worsens the prognosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

International audienceCerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon venous thromboembolic event accounting for <1% of strokes resulting in brain parenchymal injuries. JAK2V617F mutation, the most frequent driving mutation of myeloproliferative neoplasms has been reported to be associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with CVST. We investigated whether hematopoietic JAK2V617F expression predisposes to specific pathophysiological processes and/or worse prognosis after CVST. Using an in vivo mouse model of CVST, we analyzed clinical, biological and imaging outcomes in mice with hematopoietic-restricted Jak2V617F expression, compared to Jak2WT mice. In parallel, we studied a human cohort of JAK2V617F-positive or negative CVST. Early after CVST, mice with hematopoietic Jak2V617F expression had increased adhesion of platelets and neutrophils in cerebral veins located in the vicinity of CVST. On day 1, Jak2V617F mice had a worse outcome characterized by significantly more frequent and severe intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) and higher mortality rates. Peripheral neutrophil activation was enhanced, as indicated by higher circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates, upregulated CD11b expression, and higher myeloperoxydase (MPO) plasma level. Concurrently, immunohistological and brain homogenates analysis showed higher neutrophil infiltration and increased blood-brain-barrier disruption. Similarly, JAK2V617F-positive CVST patients tended to present higher thrombotic burden and had significantly higher SII, a systemic thrombo-inflammatory marker, compared to JAK2V617F-negative patients. In mice with CVST, our study corroborates that Jak2V617F mutation leads to a specific pattern including increased thrombotic burden, ICH and mortality. The exacerbated thrombo-inflammatory response, observed both in mice and JAK2V617F-positive patients, could contribute to hemorrhagic complications