Clinical impact of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention

N/

Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objectives: To overview and summarize the results emerging from the studies on adjunctive devices (AD) with theoretical anti-embolic properties in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Background: A series of small-to-medium size randomized studies have compared different AD with standard PCI (SP) in the setting of STEMI. The reported results are conflicting. Methods: Eighteen prospective randomized studies on 3180 STEMI patients comparing AD with SP were identified and entered the meta-analysis. Pre-specified angiographic, electrocardiographic (absence of ST-segment resolution, STR) and early (up to 30 days) clinical end-points were assessed. Results: AD were associated with lower rates of angiographically evident distal embolization: OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.37-0.81). Analyses of angiographic and electrocardiographic reperfusion showed striking heterogeneity among studies and an overall trend toward better results with AD: OR (95% CI) 0.76 (95% CI 0.51-1.12) for TIMI<3, 0.53 (0.37-0.76) for myocardial blush grade (MBG)<3, 0.60 (0.45-0.78) for absence of STR. Subgroup analysis according to the type of AD for the end-point of no STR showed concordant absence of benefit in studies testing distal protection devices, positive results being confined to the studies using thrombectomy devices (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66). However, the possibility of a "small study" bias within thrombectomy studies cannot be discharged (significant heterogeneity and positive Egger's test). Early major adverse cardiac events were not different between AD and SP. Conclusions: AD use may be associated with reduced rate of angiographic distal embolization, and improved MBG 3 and STR rates. However, efficacy might vary with the type of device employed. Moreover, early clinical outcome is not modified suggesting that further, larger, studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of AD. Condensed abstract: We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 prospective randomized trials comparing adjunctive devices (AD) with standard PCI in the setting of STEMI. The use of AD was associated with lower rates of (angiographically evident) distal embolization. Analyses of angiographic and electrocardiographic reperfusion showed striking heterogeneity and an overall trend toward better results with AD. Subgroup analysis suggested that different types of device may have different effects. Early major adverse cardiac events were similar between AD and SP

Safety and efficacy of G-CSF in patients with ischemic heart failure: The CORNER (Cell Option for Recovery in the Non-Eligible patients for Revascularization) study.

BACKGROUND: Demonstration that the heart is not a post-mitotic organ has led to clinical trials trying to obtain myocardial repair even in patients with heart failure. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate as a less invasive method for promoting cardiac repair. METHODS: Thirteen patients with ischemic heart failure in NYHA and/or CCS classes >/=3 unsuitable for revascularization received G-CSF, as a compassionate use, in addition to optimal medical therapy. Symptoms and cardiac perfusion by gated-SPECT were assessed at baseline and at 4month follow up. RESULTS: G-CSF was generally well tolerated. NYHA and CCS classes improved significantly from 3 (IR 2.5-3) to 2 (IR 1-2.5) (p=0.012) and from 3 (IR 1-3) to 1 (IR 1-2) (p=0.033). Heart failure severity symptoms according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores exhibited a non significant improvement from 52+/-27 to 39+/-26 (p=0.15). At the Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores (ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating better status), physical limitation improved from 39+/-31 to 64+/-29 (p=0.03), angina stability from 42+/-29 to 64+/-28 (p=0.05), angina frequency from 53+/-33 to 73+/-26 (p=0.04), treatment satisfaction from 67+/-29 to 83+/-21 (p=0.07), disease perception from 37+/-29 to 66+/-26 (p=0.007). Quality of life assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale improved from 33+/-24 to 64+/-20mm (p=0.003). Stress and differential regional perfusion scores improved significantly from 1.78+/-1.38 to 1.66+/-1.38 (p=0.05) and from 0.35+/-0.68 to 0.23+/-0.53 (p=0.02) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ischemic heart failure unsuitable for revascularization, G-CSF is associated to a significant improvement of symptoms, possibly reducing stress-induced ischemia

Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Objectives: To overview and summarize the results emerging from the studies on adjunctive devices (AD) with theoretical anti-embolic properties in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Background: A series of small-to-medium size randomized studies have compared different AD with standard PCI (SP) in the setting of STEMI. The reported results are conflicting. Methods: Eighteen prospective randomized studies on 3180 STEMI patients comparing AD with SP were identified and entered the meta-analysis. Pre-specified angiographic, electrocardiographic (absence of ST-segment resolution, STR) and early (up to 30 days) clinical end-points were assessed. Results: AD were associated with lower rates of angiographically evident distal embolization: OR (95% CI): 0.54 (0.37-0.81). Analyses of angiographic and electrocardiographic reperfusion showed striking heterogeneity among studies and an overall trend toward better results with AD: OR (95% CI) 0.76 (95% CI 0.51-1.12) for TIMI<3, 0.53 (0.37-0.76) for myocardial blush grade (MBG)<3, 0.60 (0.45-0.78) for absence of STR. Subgroup analysis according to the type of AD for the end-point of no STR showed concordant absence of benefit in studies testing distal protection devices, positive results being confined to the studies using thrombectomy devices (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32-0.66). However, the possibility of a "small study" bias within thrombectomy studies cannot be discharged (significant heterogeneity and positive Egger's test). Early major adverse cardiac events were not different between AD and SP. Conclusions: AD use may be associated with reduced rate of angiographic distal embolization, and improved MBG 3 and STR rates. However, efficacy might vary with the type of device employed. Moreover, early clinical outcome is not modified suggesting that further, larger, studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of AD. Condensed abstract: We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 prospective randomized trials comparing adjunctive devices (AD) with standard PCI in the setting of STEMI. The use of AD was associated with lower rates of (angiographically evident) distal embolization. Analyses of angiographic and electrocardiographic reperfusion showed striking heterogeneity and an overall trend toward better results with AD. Subgroup analysis suggested that different types of device may have different effects. Early major adverse cardiac events were similar between AD and SP

Design of the PERSEO Registry on the management of patients treated with oral anticoagulants and coronary stent

Aim Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-S) in patients requiring chronic oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and ischemic complications. Different randomized studies showed a significant advantage of a double antithrombotic therapy and superiority of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with warfarin, but real-world data are limited. Aim is to evaluate the antithrombotic management and clinical outcome of patients with an indication for OAC who undergo PCI-S in a 'real-world' setting. Methods The multicentre prospective observational PERSEO (PERcutaneouS coronary intErventions in patients treated with Oral anticoagulant therapy) Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03392948) has been designed to enrol patients requiring OAC treated by PCI-S in 25 Italian centres. A target of at least 1080 patients will be followed for 1 year and data on thromboembolic and bleeding events and changes in antithrombotic therapy will be registered. The primary end point is a combined measure of efficacy and safety outcome (NACE), including major bleeding events and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with DOAC (and dual or triple antiplatelet therapy) compared with the corresponding strategies with vitamin K antagonists. A secondary prespecified analysis has been defined to evaluate NACE in dual versus triple antithrombotic therapy after hospital discharge at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion The PERSEO Registry will investigate in a 'real world' setting the safety and efficacy of DOAC versus warfarin and dual versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with indication for oral anticoagulant therapy who undergo PCI-S

Effect of intensive vs standard statin therapy on endothelial progenitor cells and left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Statins for regeneration after acute myocardial infarction and PCI (STRAP) trial

Intensive statin therapy can lower the risk of recurrence of major cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This could be related to the ability of statins to increase levels of Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs), which were demonstrated to be favorably associated with a better prognosis and post-infarction left ventricular remodeling in patients with ischemic heart disease. AIM OF THE STUDY: First, to evaluate, in a randomized clinical trial, the effect of an intensive vs a standard treatment with statins on EPC mobilization in patients undergoing a successful primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention; secondary, to evaluate whether left ventricular remodeling could be influenced by statin therapy through EPC mobilization. METHODS: Forty ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing a successful primary or rescue PCI were randomized to receive atorvastatin 80 mg immediately after the admission (Intensive Treatment, IT) or atorvastatin 20 mg from the day of the discharge (Standard Treatment, ST). CD34+/KDR+ EPC count by flow cytometry and left ventricular function by 2-D Echo were measured on admission, at discharge and at 4 months follow up. RESULTS: We found that EPC count was similar in the two groups of patients both on admission and at discharge. At follow up, however, EPC count was higher in patients randomized to IT compared to patients randomized to ST (7.59+/-7.30 vs 3.04+/-3.93, p=0.04). However, LV volumes, ejection fraction and wall motion score index were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive statin treatment after primary or rescue PCI is associated with a higher EPC count at follow up as compared to standard treatment. This beneficial effect did not translate in an improvement of LV function

Usefulness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with a large anterior wall acute myocardial infarction to prevent left ventricular remodeling (the rigenera study).

Intracoronary injection of bone marrow stem cells seems to improve left ventricular (LV) function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could improve myocardial function and perfusion noninvasively through mobilization of stem cells into peripheral blood, although previous clinical trials have produced controversial results. Forty-one patients with large anterior wall AMI at high risk of unfavorable remodeling were randomized 1:2 to G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day for 5 days) or to conventional therapy. All patients underwent successful primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. LV function was assessed by echocardiography before G-CSF administration, > or =5 days after AMI, and at follow-up. Only patients with a LV ejection fraction <50% at baseline were enrolled in the study. After a median follow-up of 5 months (range 4 to 6) patients treated with G-CSF exhibited improvement in LV ejection fraction, from 40 +/- 6% to 45 +/- 6% (p = 0.068) in the absence of LV dilation (LV end-diastolic volume from 147 +/- 33 to 144 +/- 46 ml at follow-up, p = 0.77). In contrast, patients treated conventionally exhibited significant LV dilation (LV end-diastolic volume from 141 +/- 35 to 168 +/- 41 ml, p = 0.002) in the absence of change in LV ejection fraction (from 38 +/- 6% to 38 +/- 8%, p = 0.95). However, when comparing patients treated with G-CSF with controls, variations in these parameters were significantly different at 2-way analysis of variance (p = 0.04 for LV end-diastolic volume, p = 0.02 for LV ejection fraction). In conclusion, G-CSF prevents unfavorable LV remodeling and improves LV function in patients with large anterior wall AMI and decreased LV ejection fraction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention