Randomized phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly versus twice-weekly dose-intensive cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: To establish the maximum dose intensity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine on a weekly or two-weekly schedule in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV were randomized to receive weekly or two-weekly courses of gemcitabine on day 1 and cisplatin on day 2. An interpatient dose escalation scheme was used, and pharmacokinetics were determined for both agents in plasma and WBCs. Results: Seventy-three patients were included, 32 on the weekly schedule and 41 on the two-weekly schedule. Fifty patients received all planned courses. Dose-limiting toxicities were leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and trombocytopenia on the weekly schedule and ototoxicity on the two-weekly schedule. Most common nonhematological toxicities consisted of nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The highest dose intensity of cisplatin could be achieved on the two-weekly schedule, and therefore, further development of the weekly schedule was abandoned. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1500 mg/m2 gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin 90 mg/m2. More than half (53%) of patients achieved an objective response on the two-weekly schedule, versus 23% in the weekly treatment arm. The pharmacokinetic studies revealed a significant interaction: gemcitabine reduced both GG and AG platinum-DNA intrastrand adducts in WBCs. Conclusion: The combination of gemcitabine (1500 mg/ m2) with cisplatin at a dose intensity of 50 mg/m 2/week is feasible on a two-weekly administration scheme in NSCLC patients

Marking Axillary Lymph Nodes With Radioactive Iodine Seeds for Axillary Staging After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients The MARI Procedure

Objective: The MARI procedure [marking the axillary lymph node with radioactive iodine (I-125) seeds] is a new minimal invasive method to assess the pathological response of nodal metastases after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) in patients with breast cancer. This method allows axilla-conserving surgery in patients responding well to NST. Methods: Prior to NST, proven tumor-positive axillary lymph nodes were marked with a I-125 seed. This marked lymph node is the so-called MARI-node. After NST, the MARI node was selectively removed using a gamma-detection probe. A complementary axillary lymph node dissection was performed in all patients to assess whether pathological response in the MARI node was indicative for the pathological response in the additional lymph nodes. Results: A tumor-positive axillary lymph node was marked with a I-125 seed in 100 patients. The MARI node was successfully identified in 97 of these 100 patients (identification rate 97%). Two patients did not undergo subsequent axillary lymph node dissection, leaving 95 patients for further analysis. The MARI node contained residual tumor cells in 65 of these 95 patients. In the other 30 patients, the MARI node was free of tumor, but additional positive lymph nodes were found in 5 patients. Thus, the MARI procedure correctly identified 65 of 70 patients with residual axillary tumor activity (false negative rate 5/70 = 7%). Conclusions: This study shows that marking and selectively removing metastatic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant systemic treatment has a high identification rate and a low false negative rate. The tumor response in the marked lymph node may be used to tailor further axillary treatment after NS

Trastuzumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin as neo-adjuvant treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer : The TRAIN-study

Aim To determine the efficacy and safety of an anthracycline-free neo-adjuvant regimen consisting of weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods Patients with stage II or III HER2-positive breast cancer received weekly paclitaxel ([P], 70 mg/m2), trastuzumab ([T], 2 mg/kg, loading dose 4 mg/kg) and carboplatin ([C], AUC = 3 mg ml−1 min) for 24 weeks. In weeks 7, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 24, trastuzumab was administered without chemotherapy. The primary end-point was pathologic complete response in the surgical resection specimen, defined as the absence of invasive tumour cells in breast and axilla. Results One hundred and eleven patients were included in the study, and 108 were evaluable for the primary end-point. The pathologic complete response rate was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33–52). Median follow-up was 52 months, and the 3-year event-free survival was 88% (95% CI: 82–94), and the 3-year overall survival was 92% (95% CI: 88–98). The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (67%) and thrombocytopenia (43%). Less than five percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. No symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction was observed during neo-adjuvant treatment. Conclusion An anthracycline-free neo-adjuvant regimen of weekly paclitaxel, trastuzumab and carboplatin is highly effective in HER2-positive breast cancer with manageable toxicity

High-dose alkylating chemotherapy in BRCA-altered triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized phase III NeoTN trial

Abstract Exploratory analyses of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy trials have suggested that BRCA1 or BRCA2-pathway altered (BRCA-altered) breast cancer might be particularly sensitive to this type of treatment. In this study, patients with BRCA-altered tumors who had received three initial courses of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), were randomized between a fourth ddAC course followed by high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide or conventional chemotherapy (initially ddAC only or ddAC-capecitabine/decetaxel [CD] depending on MRI response, after amendment ddAC-carboplatin/paclitaxel [CP] for everyone). The primary endpoint was the neoadjuvant response index (NRI). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 122 patients were randomized. No difference in NRI-score distribution (p = 0.41) was found. A statistically non-significant RFS difference was found (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.23–1.25; p = 0.15). Exploratory RFS analyses showed benefit in stage III (n = 35; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03–0.75), but not stage II (n = 86; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.30–3.30) patients. For stage III, 4-year RFS was 46% (95% CI 24–87%), 71% (95% CI 48–100%) and 88% (95% CI 74–100%), for ddAC/ddAC-CD, ddAC-CP and high-dose chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were found between high-dose and conventional chemotherapy in stage II-III, triple-negative, BRCA-altered breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to establish if there are patients with stage III, triple negative BRCA-altered breast cancer for whom outcomes can be improved with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy or whether the current standard neoadjuvant therapy including carboplatin and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is sufficient. Trial Registration: NCT01057069