Increased copy number at 3p14 in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: The present study was conducted to investigate if chromosome band 3p14 is of any pathogenic significance in the malignant process of breast cancer. Genetic studies have implicated a tumour suppressor gene on chromosome arm 3p and we have proposed LRIG1 at 3p14 as a candidate tumour suppressor. The LRIG1 gene encodes an integral membrane protein that counteracts signalling by receptor tyrosine kinases belonging to the ERBB family. LRIG1 mRNA and protein are expressed in many tissues, including breast tissue. METHODS: In the present report we analysed the LRIG1 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), LRIG1 mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR, and LRIG1 protein by western blot analysis. Two tumour series were analysed; one series consisted of 19 tumour samples collected between 1987 and 1995 and the other series consisted of 9 tumour samples with corresponding non-neoplastic breast tissues collected consecutively. RESULTS: The LRIG1 gene showed increased copy number in 11 out of 28 tumours (39%) and only one tumour showed a deletion at this locus. Increased LRIG1 copy number was associated with increased levels of LRIG1 mRNA (two of three tumours) and protein (four of four tumours) in the tumours compared to matched non-neoplastic breast tissue, as assessed by RT-PCR and western blot analysis. CONCLUSION: The molecular function of LRIG1 as a negative regulator of ERBB receptors questions the biological significance of increased LRIG1 copy number in breast cancer. We propose that a common, but hitherto unrecognised, breast cancer linked gene is located within an amplicon containing the LRIG1 locus at 3p14.3

Expression and prognostic value of LRIG1 and the EGF-receptor family in renal cell and prostate cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family consists of four (EGFR, ErbB2, Erbb3, and ErbB4) receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) whose signalling is important for physiological and malignant cellular functions such as proliferation, survival, migration, and differentiation. EGFR and ErbB2 in particular are established oncogenes in many solid tumours and are targets for anti-cancer treatment. LRIG1 (leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains-1) is a protein that negatively regulates the EGFR-family, and other RTKs and is a proposed tumour suppressor. This thesis examines the expression of the EGFR-family members and LRIG1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and in prostate cancer (PC). In RCC, up-regulation of EGFR was shown for all RCC types analysed: clear cell (ccRCC), papillary (pRCC), and chromophobe (chRCC). ErbB2 was down-regulated in ccRCC. ErbB3 expression was low in non-neoplastic kidney and not significantly altered in RCC. ErbB4 was strongly down-regulated in the vast majority of RCCs of all types. LRIG1 was down-regulated in ccRCC. No prognostic value was found for any of these factors in RCC. In prostate cancer cells, LRIG1 was shown to be up-regulated by androgen stimulation and suppressed the growth of prostate cancer cells. In prostate cancer, the expression and prognostic value of LRIG1 was investigated in two patient series, one with untreated patients and one with patients who had undergone prostatectomy. In the untreated patient series, LRIG1 correlated with malignancy grade (Gleason score) and poor outcome for patients (both cancer specific and overall survival), being an independent prognostic factor. In contrast, in the series of patients who had undergone prostatectomy, LRIG1 expression correlated with a good outcome (overall survival). Thus in RCC, there were alterations in gene-expression of the EGFR-family members and LRIG1 between kidney cortex and RCC and between the RCC types. Despite few associations with clinical factors, these alterations are likely to be of biological importance. In prostate cancer LRIG1 was up-regulated by androgen stimulation and inhibited cell proliferation. LRIG1 expression had prognostic value in prostate cancer, maybe as a secondary marker of androgen receptor activation or because of growth inhibition of prostate cancer cells. Contradicting findings in untreated patients and patients treated with prostatectomy poses the question of whether the prognostic value of LRIG1 and other markers vary depending on the specific biological and clinical circumstances in the materials studied

Gene expression pattern of the epidermal growth factor receptor family and LRIG1 in renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Previous studies have revealed altered expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-family members and their endogenous inhibitor leucine-rich and immunoglobulin-like domains 1 (LRIG1) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this study, we analyzed the gene expression levels of EGFR-family members and LRIG1, and their possible associations with clinical parameters in various types of RCC. Methods Gene expression levels of EGFR–family members and LRIG1 were analyzed in 104 RCC samples, including 81 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 15 papillary RCC (pRCC), and 7 chromophobe RCC (chRCC) by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Associations between gene expression levels and clinical data, including tumor grade, stage, and patient survival were statistically assessed. Results Compared to kidney cortex, EGFR was up-regulated in ccRCC and pRCC, LRIG1 and ERBB2 were down-regulated in ccRCC, and ERBB4 was strongly down-regulated in all RCC types. ERBB3 expression did not differ between RCC types or between RCC and the kidney cortex. The expression of the analyzed genes did not correlate with patient outcome. Conclusions This study revealed that the previously described up-regulation of EGFR and down-regulation of ERBB4 occurred in all analyzed RCC types, whereas down-regulation of ERBB2 and LRIG1 was only present in ccRCC. These observations illustrate the need to evaluate the different RCC types individually when analyzing molecules of interest and potential biological markers.</p

Survival advantage of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with systemic and palliative treatments in a real-world setting

Background: Recently, the CARMENA and SURTIME studies, suggested that upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) should be abandoned for patients with intermediate and high-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, CN remains an indication in low-risk and when immediate systemic treatment is not required. The aim was to evaluate the long-term overall survival (OS) in patients with primary mRCC, based on the first line treatment. Methods: There were 1483 patients with primary mRCC in the National Kidney Cancer Registry from 2005 to 2013. Data on primary treatment, TNM stage, RCC type, tumor size, patient age and sex were extracted. Survival time was calculated from time of diagnosis to time of death or until July 2019. Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests, the Kaplan-Meyer method and Cox regression analyses were used. Results: Patients primary treated with CN had a significantly longer OS (p &lt; .001) than patients primary treated with systemic therapy or palliation. In a Cox regression multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for CN compared with no CN was 1.600, 95%Ci (1.492 − 1.691), p &lt; .001. Also occurrence of lymph node metastases, T-stage, patients age and year of diagnosis, remained as independent predictors of OS. Conclusion: Patients primary treated with CN survived significantly longer than patients primary treated with systemic therapy or palliation, in all age groups. CN was an important first-line treatment option in mRCC patients