L’Oscillometria a impulsi nuovo test di funzionalità respiratoria per i bambini con asma

L’asma è una malattia infiammatoria cronica delle vie aeree che può interessare l’intero albero bronchiale. Recenti evidenze dimostrano che la disfunzione delle piccole vie aeree (o small airway dysfunction, SAD) è un fattore importante nella patogenesi e nell’espressione clinica della malattia. A causa delle difficoltà nella valutazione delle vie aeree periferiche con tecniche non invasive, risulta ancora poco chiaro il ruolo della SAD nell’asma pediatrico, che è invece assodato in età adulta. Secondo recenti lavori, le piccole vie aeree sono interessate già nelle prime fasi dell’asma, ma la spirometria, il test convenzionale per la valutazione della funzione polmonare, non esamina in modo sensibile la loro funzione, risultando alterata solo quando la disfunzione periferica diventa molto rilevante. L’infiammazione cronica e la SAD rappresentano fattori di rischio per la persistenza e la gravità dell’asma, lo scarso controllo della malattia e la progressiva riduzione della funzione polmonare con l’età. Identificare e quantificare il coinvolgimento sia delle vie aeree centrali che periferiche risulta pertanto clinicamente molto rilevante per una diagnosi precoce e per ottenere un buon controllo dell’asma, ridurre l’iperreattività bronchiale e monitorare la risposta al trattamento di fondo. Questo articolo descrive le evidenze recenti sul ruolo della SAD nello sviluppo e nel controllo dell’asma pediatrico e valuta il contributo di una nuova tecnica diagnostica disponibile in ambito ambulatoriale, l’oscillometria a impulsi, nella diagnosi precoce di SAD in età prescolare e scolare, nel monitoraggio dell’asma (in associazione alla spirometria) e nella gestione terapeutica

Psychological treatments and psychotherapies in the neurorehabilitation of pain. Evidences and recommendations from the italian consensus conference on pain in neurorehabilitation

BACKGROUND: It is increasingly recognized that treating pain is crucial for effective care within neurological rehabilitation in the setting of the neurological rehabilitation. The Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation was constituted with the purpose identifying best practices for us in this context. Along with drug therapies and physical interventions, psychological treatments have been proven to be some of the most valuable tools that can be used within a multidisciplinary approach for fostering a reduction in pain intensity. However, there is a need to elucidate what forms of psychotherapy could be effectively matched with the specific pathologies that are typically addressed by neurorehabilitation teams. OBJECTIVES: To extensively assess the available evidence which supports the use of psychological therapies for pain reduction in neurological diseases. METHODS: A systematic review of the studies evaluating the effect of psychotherapies on pain intensity in neurological disorders was performed through an electronic search using PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Based on the level of evidence of the included studies, recommendations were outlined separately for the different conditions. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 2352 results and the final database included 400 articles. The overall strength of the recommendations was medium/low. The different forms of psychological interventions, including Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, cognitive or behavioral techniques, Mindfulness, hypnosis, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Brief Interpersonal Therapy, virtual reality interventions, various forms of biofeedback and mirror therapy were found to be effective for pain reduction in pathologies such as musculoskeletal pain, fibromyalgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Central Post-Stroke pain, Phantom Limb Pain, pain secondary to Spinal Cord Injury, multiple sclerosis and other debilitating syndromes, diabetic neuropathy, Medically Unexplained Symptoms, migraine and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions and psychotherapies are safe and effective treatments that can be used within an integrated approach for patients undergoing neurological rehabilitation for pain. The different interventions can be specifically selected depending on the disease being treated. A table of evidence and recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation is also provided in the final part of the pape

What is the role of the placebo effect for pain relief in neurorehabilitation? Clinical implications from the Italian consensus conference on pain in neurorehabilitation

Background: It is increasingly acknowledged that the outcomes of medical treatments are influenced by the context of the clinical encounter through the mechanisms of the placebo effect. The phenomenon of placebo analgesia might be exploited to maximize the efficacy of neurorehabilitation treatments. Since its intensity varies across neurological disorders, the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCP) summarized the studies on this field to provide guidance on its use. Methods: A review of the existing reviews and meta-analyses was performed to assess the magnitude of the placebo effect in disorders that may undergo neurorehabilitation treatment. The search was performed on Pubmed using placebo, pain, and the names of neurological disorders as keywords. Methodological quality was assessed using a pre-existing checklist. Data about the magnitude of the placebo effect were extracted from the included reviews and were commented in a narrative form. Results: 11 articles were included in this review. Placebo treatments showed weak effects in central neuropathic pain (pain reduction from 0.44 to 0.66 on a 0-10 scale) and moderate effects in postherpetic neuralgia (1.16), in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (1.45), and in pain associated to HIV (1.82). Moderate effects were also found on pain due to fibromyalgia and migraine; only weak short-term effects were found in complex regional pain syndrome. Confounding variables might have influenced these results. Clinical implications: These estimates should be interpreted with caution, but underscore that the placebo effect can be exploited in neurorehabilitation programs. It is not necessary to conceal its use from the patient. Knowledge of placebo mechanisms can be used to shape the doctor-patient relationship, to reduce the use of analgesic drugs and to train the patient to become an active agent of the therapy

Using the six-minute walking test to assess the clinical response to mepolizumab and conventional therapy in severe eosinophilic asthma

Background Severe asthma limits exercise to avoid respiratory symptoms. The objective of the present study was to investigate the role of the 6-min walk test (6MWT) in severe asthma. Methods Consecutive patients with severe eosinophilic asthma were enrolled. A 6MWT was performed before and after 12 months. Inhaled therapy dose, oral corticosteroids dose, pulmonary function tests, eosinophil blood count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), Asthma Control Test (ACT) score and responses to the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) were also recorded. Results Of the 22 patients enrolled, 13 were treated with mepolizumab 100 mg every 4 weeks in addition to conventional therapy and nine with conventional therapy only. The majority of the patients were treated with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists/long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists, while approximately half were on continuous oral corticosteroids. After 12 months, the mepolizumab group only showed a significant improvement in pulmonary function tests (percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 s and percentage forced expiratory flow at 25–75% forced vital capacity (FEF25–75%), both p0.05). By paired comparisons, statistically significant improvements of the mean 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were observed in the mepolizumab (p<0.001) and conventional therapy (p<0.01) groups, while no improvement was seen in dyspnoea Borg scale, heart rate, percentage oxygen saturation or systolic and diastolic blood pressure. 6MWD showed significant direct correlations with ACT (r=0.5998, p<0.001), AQLQ (r=0.3978, p=0.009) and FEF25–75% (r=0.3589, p=0.017). Conclusions The 6MWT could complement severe asthma assessment and be relevant in evaluating the objective response to treatment, including biological therapies like mepolizumab

Asthma and COVID-19: a dangerous liaison?

: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), provoked the most striking international public health crisis of our time. COVID-19 can cause a range of breathing problems, from mild to critical, with potential evolution to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Elderly adults and those affected with chronic cardiovascular, metabolic, and respiratory conditions carry a higher risk of severe COVID-19. Given the global burden of asthma, there are well-founded concerns that the relationship between COVID-19 and asthma could represent a "dangerous liaison".Here we aim to review the latest evidence on the links between asthma and COVID-19 and provide reasoned answers to current concerns, such as the risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or severe COVID-19 stratified by asthmatic patients, the contribution of type-2 vs. non-type-2 asthma and asthma-COPD overlap to the risk of COVID-19 development. We also address the potential role of both standard anti-inflammatory asthma therapies and new biological agents for severe asthma, such as mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, on the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes

Small airway dysfunction in asthmatic patients treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy: A perfect storm

Background: Short-acting beta agonist (SABA)-only treatment is associated with poor asthma control and adverse clinical outcomes. The importance of small airway dysfunction (SAD) is increasingly recognized in asthma, but less is known in patients using SABA-only therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of SAD on asthma control in an unselected cohort of 60 adults with physician-diagnosed intermittent asthma treated with as-needed SABA monotherapy. Methods: All patients underwent standard spirometry and impulse oscillometry (IOS) at the first visit and were stratified by the presence of SAD defined by IOS (fall in resistance 5-20 Hz [R5-R20]>0.07 kPa × s*L-1). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to analyze cross-sectional relationships between clinical variables and SAD. Results: SAD was present in 73% of the cohort. Compared with patients without SAD, adults with SAD had a higher number of severe exacerbations (65.9% versus 25.0%, p < 0.05), higher use of annual SABA canisters (median (IQR), 3 (1.75-3) versus 1 (1-2), p < 0.001), and significantly less well-controlled asthma (11.7% versus 75.0%, p < 0.001). Spirometry parameters were similar between patients with IOS-defined SAD and those without SAD. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction symptoms (EIB, odds ratio [OR] 31.18; 95%CI:4.85-365.00) and night awakenings due to asthma (OR 30.30; 95%CI:2.61-1141.00) were independent predictors of SAD, with a high predictive power of the model incorporating these baseline predictors (AUC 0.92). Conclusions: EIB and nocturnal symptoms are strong predictors of SAD in asthmatic patients using as-needed SABA-monotherapy, helping to distinguish subjects with SAD among patients with asthma when IOS cannot be performed