21 research outputs found

    Reconstructing Native American population history

    Get PDF
    The peopling of the Americas has been the subject of extensive genetic, archaeological and linguistic research; however, central questions remain unresolved. One contentious issue is whether the settlement occurred by means of a single migration or multiple streams of migration from Siberia. The pattern of dispersals within the Americas is also poorly understood. To address these questions at a higher resolution than was previously possible, we assembled data from 52 Native American and 17 Siberian groups genotyped at 364,470 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Here we show that Native Americans descend from at least three streams of Asian gene flow. Most descend entirely from a single ancestral population that we call First American. However, speakers of Eskimog-Aleut languages from the Arctic inherit almost half their ancestry from a second stream of Asian gene flow, and the Na-Dene-speaking Chipewyan from Canada inherit roughly one-tenth of their ancestry from a third stream. We show that the initial peopling followed a southward expansion facilitated by the coast, with sequential population splits and little gene flow after divergence, especially in South America. A major exception is in Chibchan speakers on both sides of the Panama isthmus, who have ancestry from both North and South America. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.Fil: Reich, David. Harvard Medical School; Estados Unidos. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Patterson, Nick. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Campbell, Desmond. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. The University Of Hong Kong; Hong KongFil: Tandon, Arti. Harvard Medical School; Estados Unidos. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosFil: Mazieres, Stéphane. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Ray, Nicolas. Universidad de Ginebra; SuizaFil: Parra, Maria V.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Rojas, Winston. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Duque, Constanza. Universidad de Antioquia; Colombia. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Mesa, Natalia. Universidad de Antioquia; Colombia. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: García, Luis F.. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Triana, Omar. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Blair, Silvia. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Maestre, Amanda. Universidad de Antioquia; ColombiaFil: Dib, Juan C.. Fundación Salud Para El Tró Pico; ColombiaFil: Bravi, Claudio Marcelo. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular; ArgentinaFil: Bailliet, Graciela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular; ArgentinaFil: Corach, Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Hünemeier, Tábita. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Bortolini, Maria Cátira. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Salzano, Francisco M.. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Petzl Erler, María Luiza. Universidade Federal do Paraná; BrasilFil: Acuña Alonzo, Victor. National Institute Of Anthropology And History; MéxicoFil: Aguilar Salinas, Carlos. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubiran; MéxicoFil: Canizales-Quinteros, Samuel. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Tusié Luna, Teresa. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Riba, Laura. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Rodríguez Cruz, Maricela. Umae Hospital de Pediatría Centro Medico Nacional Siglo Xxi; MéxicoFil: Lopez Alarcón, Mardia. Umae Hospital de Pediatría Centro Medico Nacional Siglo Xxi; MéxicoFil: Coral Vazquez, Ramón. Instituto Politécnico Nacional; Méxic

    Reconstructing Native American Population History

    Get PDF
    The peopling of the Americas has been the subject of extensive genetic, archaeological and linguistic research; however, central questions remain unresolved1–5. One contentious issue is whether the settlement occurred via a single6–8 or multiple streams of migration from Siberia9–15. The pattern of dispersals within the Americas is also poorly understood. To address these questions at higher resolution than was previously possible, we assembled data from 52 Native American and 17 Siberian groups genotyped at 364,470 single nucleotide polymorphisms. We show that Native Americans descend from at least three streams of Asian gene flow. Most descend entirely from a single ancestral population that we call “First American”. However, speakers of Eskimo-Aleut languages from the Arctic inherit almost half their ancestry from a second stream of Asian gene flow, and the Na-Dene-speaking Chipewyan from Canada inherit roughly one-tenth of their ancestry from a third stream. We show that the initial peopling followed a southward expansion facilitated by the coast, with sequential population splits and little gene flow after divergence, especially in South America. A major exception is in Chibchan-speakers on both sides of the Panama Isthmus, who have ancestry from both North and South America

    Type 2 Diabetes Variants Disrupt Function of SLC16A11 through Two Distinct Mechanisms

    Get PDF
    Type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects Latinos at twice the rate seen in populations of European descent. We recently identified a risk haplotype spanning SLC16A11 that explains ∼20% of the increased T2D prevalence in Mexico. Here, through genetic fine-mapping, we define a set of tightly linked variants likely to contain the causal allele(s). We show that variants on the T2D-associated haplotype have two distinct effects: (1) decreasing SLC16A11 expression in liver and (2) disrupting a key interaction with basigin, thereby reducing cell-surface localization. Both independent mechanisms reduce SLC16A11 function and suggest SLC16A11 is the causal gene at this locus. To gain insight into how SLC16A11 disruption impacts T2D risk, we demonstrate that SLC16A11 is a proton-coupled monocarboxylate transporter and that genetic perturbation of SLC16A11 induces changes in fatty acid and lipid metabolism that are associated with increased T2D risk. Our findings suggest that increasing SLC16A11 function could be therapeutically beneficial for T2D. Video Abstract [Figure presented] Keywords: type 2 diabetes (T2D); genetics; disease mechanism; SLC16A11; MCT11; solute carrier (SLC); monocarboxylates; fatty acid metabolism; lipid metabolism; precision medicin

    Contribution of Known Genetic Risk Variants to Dyslipidemias and Type 2 Diabetes in Mexico: A Population-Based Nationwide Study

    No full text
    Dyslipidemias are common risk factors for the development of chronic disorders including type 2 diabetes (T2D). Over 100 associated loci have been identified but few reports have evaluated the population attributable fraction captured by them in population-based nationwide surveys. Therefore, we determined the population contribution of a set of known genetic risk variants to the development of dyslipidemias and T2D in Mexico. This study included 1665 participants from a Mexican National Health Survey carried out in the year 2000. It is a probabilistic complex sample survey of households, which comprises representative data at a national level. 103 previously reported SNPs associated with different dyslipidemias or T2D were genotyped and used to compute polygenic risk scores. We found that the previously known variants associated with dyslipidemias explain at most 7% of the total risk variance of lipid levels. In contrast, the known genetic risk component for T2D explained a negligible amount of variance (0.1%). Notably, variants derived from the Native-American ancestry have the strongest effect and contribute with a high proportion of the variance. These results support the need for additional studies aimed to identify specific genetic risk variants for Mexican population

    A novel nonsense mutation in the insulin receptor gene in a patient with HAIR-AN syndrome and endometrial cancer

    No full text
    Severe insulin resistance can be caused by rare genetic defects in the insulin receptor known as insulin receptoropathies. These genetic defects cause a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from mild syndromes to lethal disorders. Among those is the HAIR-AN an extreme subtype of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). We present a case of a 29-year-old woman with amenorrhea, severe insulin resistance, hirsutism, and acanthosis nigricans who also developed endometrial cancer. She was found to carry a novel heterozygous nonsense mutation insulin receptor gene (INSR). The mutation was inherited from the mother. Levels of insulin receptor and AKT were measured using Western-Blot from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and were both decreased. Thus, we conclude that the identified mutation in the insulin receptor gene and lead to decreased activity of the downstream signaling of the insulin pathway

    A panel of 32 AIMs suitable for population stratification correction and global ancestry estimation in Mexican mestizos

    No full text
    Abstract Background Association studies are useful to unravel the genetic basis of common human diseases. However, the presence of undetected population structure can lead to both false positive results and failures to detect genuine associations. Even when most of the approaches to deal with population stratification require genome-wide data, the use of a well-selected panel of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) may appropriately correct for population stratification. Few panels of AIMs have been developed for Latino populations and most contain a high number of markers (> 100 AIMs). For some association studies such as candidate gene approaches, it may be unfeasible to genotype a numerous set of markers to avoid false positive results. In such cases, methods that use fewer AIMs may be appropriate. Results We validated an accurate and cost-effective panel of AIMs, for use in population stratification correction of association studies and global ancestry estimation in Mexicans, as well as in populations having large proportions of both European and Native American ancestries. Based on genome-wide data from 1953 Mexican individuals, we performed a PCA and SNP weights were calculated to select subsets of unlinked AIMs within percentiles 0.10 and 0.90, ensuring that all chromosomes were represented. Correlations between PC1 calculated using genome-wide data versus each subset of AIMs (16, 32, 48 and 64) were r 2  = 0.923, 0.959, 0.972 and 0.978, respectively. When evaluating PCs performance as population stratification adjustment covariates, no correlation was found between P values obtained from uncorrected and genome-wide corrected association analyses (r 2  = 0.141), highlighting that population stratification correction is compulsory for association analyses in admixed populations. In contrast, high correlations were found when adjusting for both PC1 and PC2 for either subset of AIMs (r 2  > 0.900). After multiple validations, including an independent sample, we selected a minimal panel of 32 AIMs, which are highly informative of the major ancestral components of Mexican mestizos, namely European and Native American ancestries. Finally, the correlation between the global ancestry proportions calculated using genome-wide data and our panel of 32 AIMs was r 2  = 0.972. Conclusions Our panel of 32 AIMs accurately estimated global ancestry and corrected for population stratification in association studies in Mexican individuals
    corecore