221 research outputs found
Cycle-finite module categories
We describe the structure of module categories of finite dimensional algebras
over an algebraically closed field for which the cycles of nonzero
nonisomorphisms between indecomposable finite dimensional modules are finite
(do not belong to the infinite Jacobson radical of the module category).
Moreover, geometric and homological properties of these module categories are
exhibited
Tilted algebras and short chains of modules
We provide an affirmative answer for the question raised almost twenty years
ago concerning the characterization of tilted artin algebras by the existence
of a sincere finitely generated module which is not the middle of a short
chain
Clinical significance of morphological variations of the inferior phrenic arteries
The rapid development of sciences such as genetics and molecular biology offers hope that better therapeutic methods can be developed and diagnosis and treatment made more effective. However, we must not forget that the basis for understanding the complex mechanisms of diseases and associated symptoms is knowledge of the relevant location and correlation among organs. In the present study, we focus on the clinical significance of the inferior phrenic artery. The diaphragm is a muscular structure that separatesthe abdominal and chest cavities. Thanks to this position, the inferior phrenic artery is much more significant than formerly assumed. A rich network of collaterals makes this vessel important in the development of neoplasms and metastases. Knowledge of anatomical variants of the inferior phrenic artery is also crucial for radiological procedures such as embolization. The main aim of this study is to review the involvement of the inferior phrenic artery in physiological and pathophysiological processes. This work has value for all practicing doctors, especially radiologists and surgeons
Sprawozdanie z ESTRO-Forum for Central and Eastern Europe: education, infrastructure and health economics in radiotherapy
Current status of MELCOR 2.2 for fusion safety analyses
MELCOR is an integral code developed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) to perform severe accident analyses of Light Water Reactors (LWR). More recently, MELCOR capabilities are being extended also to analyze non-LWR fission technologies. Within the European MELCOR User Group (EMUG), organized in the framework of USNRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP), an activity on the evaluation of the applicability of MELCOR 2.2 for fusion safety analyses has been launched and it has been coordinated by ENEA. The aim of the activity was to identify the physical models to be possibly implemented in MELCOR 2.2 necessary for fusion safety analyses, and to check if those models are already available in MELCOR 1.8.6 for fusion version, developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL). From this activity, a list of modeling needs emerged from the safety analyses of fusion-related installations have been identified and described. Then, the importance of the various needs, intended as the priority for model implementation in the MELCOR 2.2 code, has been evaluated according to the technical expert judgement of the authors. In the present paper, the identified modeling needs are discussed. The ultimate goal would be to propose to have a single integrated MELCOR 2.2 code release capable to cover both fission and fusion applications
Recommended from our members
A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science
Journal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online community for social science journal editors: www.dpjedi.org) has collated several resources on embedding open science in journal editing (www.dpjedi.org/resources). However, it can be overwhelming as an editor new to open science practices to know where to start. For this reason, we created a guide for journal editors on how to get started with open science. The guide outlines steps that editors can take to implement open policies and practices within their journal, and goes through the what, why, how, and worries of each policy and practice. This manuscript introduces and summarizes the guide (full guide: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hstcx)
Current status of Melcor 2.2 for fusion safety analyses
MELCOR is an integral code developed by Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) to perform severe accident analyses of Light Water Reactors (LWR). More recently, MELCOR capabilities are being extended also to analyze non-LWR fission technologies. Within the European MELCOR User Group (EMUG), organized in the framework of the USNRC Cooperative Severe Accident Research Program (CSARP), an activity on the evaluation of the applicability of MELCOR 2.2 for fusion safety analyses has been launched and it has been coordinated by ENEA. The aim of the activity was to identify the physical models to be possibly implemented in MELCOR 2.2 necessary for fusion safety analyses, and to check if those models are already available in MELCOR 1.8.6 fusion version, developed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL). From this activity, a list of modeling needs that emerged from the safety analyses of fusion-related installations has been
identified and described. Then, the importance of the various needs, intended as the priority for model implementation in the MELCOR 2.2 code, has been evaluated according to the technical expert judgment of the authors. In the present paper, the identified modeling needs are discussed. The ultimate goal would be to propose to have a single integrated MELCOR 2.2 code release capable to cover both fission and fusion applications
DNA promoter methylation status and protein expression of interleukin-8 in human colorectal adenocarcinomas
Main outcomes of the Phebus FPT1 uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the EU-MUSA project
The Management and Uncertainties of Severe Accidents (MUSA) project was funded in HORIZON 2020 and is
coordinated by CIEMAT (Spain). The project aims at consolidating a harmonized approach for the analysis of
uncertainties and sensitivities associated with Severe Accidents (SAs) analysis, focusing on source term figures of
merit. The Application of Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) Methods against Integral Experiments (AUQMIE –
Work Package 4 (WP4)), led by ENEA (Italy), was devoted to apply and test UQ methodologies adopting the
internationally recognized PHEBUS FPT1 test. FPT1 was chosen to test UQ methodologies because, even though
it is a simplified SA scenario, it was representative of the in-vessel phase of a severe accident initiated by a break
in the cold leg of a PWR primary circuit.
WP4 served as a platform to identify and discuss the issues encountered in the application of UQ methodol ogies to SA analyses (e.g. discuss the UQ methodology, perform the coupling between the SA codes and the UQ
tools, define the results post-processing methods, etc.). The purpose of this paper is to describe the MUSA
PHEBUS FPT1 uncertainty application exercise with the related specifications and the methodologies used by the
partners to perform the UQ exercise. The main outcomes and lessons learned of the analysis are: scripting was in
general needed for the SA code and uncertainty tool coupling and to have more flexibility; particular attention should be devoted to the proper choice of the input uncertain parameters; outlier values of figures of merit
should be carefully analyzed; the computational time is a key element to perform UQ in SA; the large number of
uncertain input parameters may complicate the interpretation of correlation or sensitivity analysis; there is the
need for a statistically solid handling of failed calculations
- …