A mixed methods investigation of behavioural determinants relating to medication error reporting by health professionals in the United Arab Emirates.

Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of medication error reporting is key to enhancing patient safety. The aim of this research was to explore medication error reporting in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), examining the attitudes, beliefs, behaviors and experiences of health professionals. The first phase was a Joanna Briggs Institute-registered systematic review of the beliefs, attitudes and experiences of health professionals relating to medication error reporting. Findings indicated the need for original research employing a mixed methods approach in order to quantify and generate in-depth information, grounded in theories of behaviour change. In the second phase, a cross-sectional survey of health professionals in the UAE was conducted to identify the behavioural determinants, facilitators and barriers of medication error reporting. Principal component analysis of responses from 294 health professionals identified six components: knowledge and skills; feedback and support; action and impact; motivation; effort; and emotions. Responses were neutral for the motivation and effort components, but negative for the emotions component. Comparison of component scores identified that positive responses were more likely to be received from nurses, females, those with greater experience and those who were older (p < 0.05). In terms of emotions, the component with the lowest scores, older respondents with greater experience gave more positive responses (p < 0.05). In the final phase, face-to-face semi-structured interviews with twenty-nine health professionals explored in depth the behavioural determinants of medication errors reporting in the UAE. The theoretical domains framework was employed in constructing the interview schedule and interpreting the findings. Goals and intentions were determinants that acted as facilitators, while beliefs of the consequences, emotions, social influences and environmental context were barriers. This doctoral research has generated original findings that can support the development of interventions based on behaviour change techniques, which will help to enhance medication error reporting. These changes could impact organisations, health professionals and patients

Quantifying behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a cross-sectional survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

The aims of this study were to quantify the behavioural determinants of health professional reporting of medication errors in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and to explore any differences between respondents. The research was undertaken using a cross-sectional survey of patient-facing doctors, nurses and pharmacists within three major hospitals of Abu Dhabi, the UAE. An online questionnaire was developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a framework of behaviour change theories. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify components and internal reliability determined. Ethical approval was obtained from a UK university and all hospital ethics committees. Two hundred and ninety-four responses were received. Questionnaire items clustered into six components of knowledge and skills, feedback and support, action and impact, motivation, effort and emotions. Respondents generally gave positive responses for knowledge and skills, feedback and support and action and impact components. Responses were more neutral for the motivation and effort components. In terms of emotions, the component with the most negative scores, there were significant differences in terms of years registered as health professional (those registered longest most positive, p = 0.002) and age (older most positive, p < 0.001) with no differences for gender and health profession. In conclusion, emotional-related issues are the dominant barrier to reporting and are common to all professions. There is a need to develop, test and implement an intervention to impact health professionals' emotions. Such an intervention should focus on evidence-based behaviour change techniques of reducing negative emotions, focusing on emotional consequences and providing social support

Exploring behavioural determinants relating to health professional reporting of medication errors: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

Purpose: Effective and efficient medication reporting processes are essential in promoting patient safety. Few qualitative studies have explored reporting of medication errors by health professionals, and none have made reference to behavioural theories. The objective was to describe and understand the behavioural determinants of health professional reporting of medication errors in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods: This was a qualitative study comprising face-to-face, semi-structured interviews within three major medical/surgical hospitals of Abu Dhabi, the UAE. Health professionals were sampled purposively in strata of profession and years of experience. The semi-structured interview schedule focused on behavioural determinants around medication error reporting, facilitators, barriers and experiences. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF; a framework of theories of behaviour change) was used as a coding framework. Ethical approval was obtained from a UK university and all participating hospital ethics committees. Results: Data saturation was achieved after interviewing ten nurses, ten pharmacists and nine physicians. Whilst it appeared that patient safety and organisational improvement goals and intentions were behavioural determinants which facilitated reporting, there were key determinants which deterred reporting. These included the beliefs of the consequences of reporting (lack of any feedback following reporting and impacting professional reputation, relationships and career progression), emotions (fear and worry) and issues related to the environmental context (time taken to report). Conclusion: These key behavioural determinants which negatively impact error reporting can facilitate the development of an intervention, centring on organisational safety and reporting culture, to enhance reporting effectiveness and efficiency

Incidence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes of inappropriate birth weight for gestational age among singleton live births in Qatar : a population-based study

Background Abnormal fetal growth can be associated with factors during pregnancy and at postpartum. Objective In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes associated with small-for-gestational age (SGA) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. Methods We performed a population-based retrospective study on 14,641 singleton live births registered in the PEARL-Peristat Study between April 2017 and March 2018 in Qatar. We estimated the incidence and examined the risk factors and outcomes using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results SGA and LGA incidence rates were 6.0% and 15.6%, respectively. In-hospital mortality among SGA and LGA infants was 2.5% and 0.3%, respectively, while for NICU admission or death in labor room and operation theatre was 28.9% and 14.9% respectively. Preterm babies were more likely to be born SGA (aRR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.45–3.57) but male infants (aRR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.4–0.81), those born to parous (aRR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45–0.93), or overweight (aRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42–0.97) mothers were less likely to be born SGA. On the other hand, males (aRR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.49–2.19), infants born to parous mothers (aRR 2.16; 95% CI, 1.63–2.82), or to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.11–1.66), or pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (aRR 2.58; 95% CI, 1.8–3.47) were significantly more likely to be LGA. SGA infants were at high risk of in-hospital mortality (aRR, 226.56; 95% CI, 3.47–318.22), neonatal intensive care unit admission or death in labor room or operation theatre (aRR, 2.14 (1.36–3.22). Conclusion Monitoring should be coordinated to alleviate the risks of inappropriate fetal growth and the associated adverse consequences.The PEARL-Peristat study was funded by Qatar National Research Fund (Grant no NPRP 6-238-3-059) and was sponsored by the Medical Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Preterm and Early Term Births: A Population-Based Register Study

Preterm birth (PTB) and early term birth (ETB) are associated with high risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity. While extreme to very PTBs have been extensively studied, studies on infants born at later stages of pregnancy, particularly late PTBs and ETBs, are lacking. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and feto-maternal outcomes of PTB and ETB births in Qatar. We examined 15,865 singleton live births using 12-month retrospective registry data from the PEARL-Peristat Study. PTB and ETB incidence rates were 8.8% and 33.7%, respectively. PTB and ETB in-hospital mortality rates were 16.9% and 0.2%, respectively. Advanced maternal age, pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM), assisted pregnancies, and preterm history independently predicted both PTB and ETB, whereas chromosomal and congenital abnormalities were found to be independent predictors of PTB but not ETB. All groups of PTB and ETB were significantly associated with low birth weight (LBW), large for gestational age (LGA) births, caesarean delivery, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)/or death of neonate in labor room (LR)/operation theatre (OT). On the other hand, all or some groups of PTB were significantly associated with small for gestational age (SGA) births, Apgar <7 at 1 and 5 minutes and in-hospital mortality. The findings of this study may serve as a basis for taking better clinical decisions with accurate assessment of risk factors, complications, and predictions of PTB and ETB.The study was approved by the Hamad Medical Corporation Institutional Review Board, with a waiver of consent. It was funded by Qatar National Research Fund (Grant no NPRP 6-238-3-059) and was sponsored by the Medical Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation. The authors want to thank their respective institutions for their continued support. The publication of this article is funded by the Qatar National Library, Doha, Qatar

Vulnerable newborn types: Analysis of population-based registries for 165 million births in 23 countries, 2000-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of novel newborn types among 165 million live births in 23 countries from 2000 to 2021. DESIGN: Population-based, multi-country analysis. SETTING: National data systems in 23 middle- and high-income countries. POPULATION: Liveborn infants. METHODS: Country teams with high-quality data were invited to be part of the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We classified live births by six newborn types based on gestational age information (preterm 90th centile) for gestational age, according to INTERGROWTH-21st standards. We considered small newborn types of any combination of preterm or SGA, and term + LGA was considered large. Time trends were analysed using 3-year moving averages for small and large types. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of six newborn types. RESULTS: We analysed 165 017 419 live births and the median prevalence of small types was 11.7% - highest in Malaysia (26%) and Qatar (15.7%). Overall, 18.1% of newborns were large (term + LGA) and was highest in Estonia 28.8% and Denmark 25.9%. Time trends of small and large infants were relatively stable in most countries. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of newborn types varies across the 23 middle- and high-income countries. Small newborn types were highest in west Asian countries and large types were highest in Europe. To better understand the global patterns of these novel newborn types, more information is needed, especially from low- and middle-income countries

Perinatal outcomes in women with class IV obesity compared to women in the normal or overweight body mass index categories: A population‐based cohort study in Qatar

Abstract Background The prevalence of childhood and adult obesity is rising exponentially worldwide. Class IV obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥50 kg/m2) is associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. This study compared these outcomes between women with class IV obesity and women in the normal or overweight categories during pregnancy. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in Qatar, including women having singleton live births beyond 24 weeks of gestation, classified into two class IV obesity and normal/overweight (BMI between 18.5 and 30.0 kg/m2). The outcome measures included the mode of delivery, development of gestational diabetes and hypertension, fetal macrosomia, small for date baby, preterm birth and neonatal morbidity. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using multivariable logistic regression models. Results A total of 247 women with class IV obesity were compared with 6797 normal/overweight women. Adjusted analysis showed that women with class IV obesity had 3.2 times higher odds of cesarean delivery (aOR: 3.19, CI: 2.26–4.50), 3.4 times higher odds of gestational diabetes (aOR: 3.39, CI: 2.55–4.50), 4.2 times higher odds of gestational hypertension (aOR: 4.18, CI: 2.45–7.13) and neonatal morbidity (aOR: 4.27, CI: 3.01–6.05), and 6.5 times higher odds of macrosomia (aOR 6.48, CI 4.22–9.99). Conclusions Class IV obesity is associated with more adverse perinatal outcomes compared with the normal or overweight BMI categories. The study results emphasized the need for specialized antenatal obesity clinics to address the associated risks and reduce complications

Data for: "Neonatal mortality risk of large for gestational age and macrosomic live births in 15 countries including 115.6 million nationwide linked records, 2000–2020"

Data collected as part of a multi-country, population-based study to compare neonatal mortality risks of large for gestational age (>90th centile for sex and gestational age) and macrosomia (>4000g) in 15 countries including 115.6 million nationwide records, 2000-2020

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Post Bariatric Surgery: A Population-Based Study

Objectives  This study had two primary objectives. First, to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and maternal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women post-BS (the exposed group). Second, to evaluate these outcomes among pregnant women without a history of BS, these include women who are obese, overweight, and with normal weight (non-exposed groups). Design This population-based study was conducted using 12-month retrospective registry data from the PEARL-Peristat Study at the Women's Wellness and Research Center (WWRC) in Qatar. Methods: We examined 6,212 parturient women and their offspring. Participants were classified into exposed (post-BS) (N=315) and non-exposed (N=5897). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 28 software. We analyzed the risk factors and outcomes using univariate and multivariable regression. Results were reported as odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted aOR with 95% confidence intervals (CI), while incidences were reported as percentages. P value was regarded as significant at Results Qatari, advanced maternal age, Parity >1, diabetes, and hypertension were found to be significant risk factors for women with post-BS. In addition, women in the post-BS group were found to be significantly more likely to have a cesarean delivery (37.5% vs. 24%, aOR=1.59, CI 1.18-2.14), preterm babies (10% vs. 7%, aOR=1.66, CI 1.06-2.59), and stillbirth (1.6% vs. 0.4%, aOR=4.53, CI 1.33-15.50) compared to the normal weight women group. Moreover, post-BS women had a higher risk of low-birth-weight neonates than obese (15% vs. 8%, aOR= 1.77, CI 1.153-2.73), overweight (15% vs. 7%, aOR=1.63, CI:1.09-2.43), and normal weight (15% vs. 8%, aOR=1.838, CI 1.23-2.75) women. Finally, women in the post-BS group were more likely to have low-birth weight neonates ( In contrast, post-BS had a lower risk of gestational diabetes than obese (19% vs. 40%, aOR=0.39, CI: 0.29-0.54) overweight (19% vs. 32%, aOR= 0.57, CI 0.42-0.79) women. Similarly, compared to the overweight group, post-BS had a lower incidence and risk of assisted birth (4% vs. 9%, aOR=0.46, CI 0.21-0.99). On the other hand, obesity significantly increased the risk of gestational diabetes, cesarean deliveries, and labor induction in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion  Pregnancies with post-BS should be considered a high-risk group for some outcomes and should be monitored closely. These findings may guide the future clinical decisions of antenatal and postnatal follow-up for post-BS women. </p