16 research outputs found

    A composite serum biomarker index for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease: a multicentre, observational, cohort study

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: In patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), we investigated composite serum biomarker panels for the diagnosis and risk-stratification of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: Twenty-eight biomarkers were analysed in 640 participants: 259 with SSc-ILD and 179 SSc-controls without ILD (Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study), 172 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-controls (Australian IPF Registry), and 30 healthy controls. A composite index was developed from biomarkers associated with ILD in multivariable analysis derived at empirical thresholds. Performance of the index to identify ILD, and specifically SSc-ILD, and its association with lung function, radiological extent, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in derivation and validation cohorts. Biomarkers to distinguish SSc-ILD from IPF-controls were identified. RESULTS: A composite biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3 and ICAM-1, was strongly associated with SSc-ILD diagnosis, independent of age, sex, smoking and lung function (index=3: pooled adjusted OR 12.72, 95%CI 4.59-35.21, p<0.001). The composite index strengthened the performance of individual biomarkers for SSc-ILD identification. In SSc patients, a higher index was associated with worse baseline disease severity (index=3 relative to index=0: adjusted absolute change in FVC% - 17.84% and DLCO% - 20.16%, both p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A composite serum biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3 and ICAM-1 may improve the identification and risk-stratification of ILD in SSc patients at baseline

    Gastroesophageal reflux and antacid therapy in IPF: analysis from the Australia IPF Registry

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and may play a role in its pathogenesis. Recent IPF treatment guidelines suggest that all patients with IPF be considered for antacid therapy. However, emerging evidence suggests that antacid therapy does not improve IPF patient outcomes and may increase the risk of pulmonary infection. METHODS:Using prospectively collected data from the Australian IPF Registry including use of antacid therapy, GORD diagnosis and GORD symptoms, the relationship of these GORD variables to survival and disease progression was assessed. The severity of GORD symptoms using the frequency scale for symptoms of GORD (FSSG) and its relationships to outcomes was also assessed for the first time in an IPF cohort. RESULTS:Five hundred eighty-seven (86%) of the 684 patients in the Australian IPF Registry were eligible for inclusion. Patients were mostly male (69%), aged 71.0 ± 8.5 years with moderate disease (FVC 81.7 ± 21.5%; DLco 48.5 ± 16.4%). Most patients were taking antacids (n = 384; 65%), though fewer had a diagnosis of GORD (n = 243, 41.4%) and typical GORD symptoms were even less common (n = 171, 29.1%). The mean FSSG score was 8.39 ± 7.45 with 43% (n = 251) having a score > 8. Overall, there was no difference in survival or disease progression, regardless of antacid treatment, GORD diagnosis or GORD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS:Neither the use of antacid therapy nor the presence of GORD symptoms affects longer term outcomes in IPF patients. This contributes to the increasing evidence that antacid therapy may not be beneficial in IPF patients and that GORD directed therapy should be considered on an individual basis to treat the symptoms of reflux.Helen E. Jo, Tamera J. Corte, Ian Glaspole, Christopher Grainge, Peter M. A. Hopkins ... Peter A. Bampton ... et al

    Disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with mild physiological impairment: analysis from the Australian IPF registry

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND:Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal fibrosing lung disease of unknown cause. The advent of anti-fibrotic medications known to slow disease progression has revolutionised IPF management in recent years. However, little is known about the natural history of IPF patients with mild physiological impairment. We aimed to assess the natural history of these patients using data from the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR). METHODS:Using our cohort of real-world IPF patients, we compared FVC criteria for mild physiological impairment (FVC ≥ 80%) against other proposed criteria: DLco ≥ 55%; CPI ≤40 and GAP stage 1 with regards agreement in classification and relationship with disease outcomes. Within the mild cohort (FVC ≥ 80%), we also explored markers associated with poorer prognosis at 12 months. RESULTS:Of the 416 AIPFR patients (mean age 70.4 years, 70% male), 216 (52%) were classified as 'mild' using FVC ≥ 80%. There was only modest agreement between FVC and DLco (k = 0.30), with better agreement with GAP (k = 0.50) and CPI (k = 0.48). Patients who were mild had longer survival, regardless of how mild physiologic impairment was defined. There was, however, no difference in the annual decline in FVC% predicted between mild and moderate-severe groups (for all proposed criteria). For patients with mild impairment (n = 216, FVC ≥ 80%), the strongest predictor of outcomes at 12 months was oxygen desaturation on a 6 min walk test. CONCLUSION:IPF patients with mild physiological impairment have better survival than patients with moderate-severe disease. Their overall rate of disease progression however, is comparable, suggesting that they are simply at different points in the natural history of IPF disease.Helen E. Jo, Ian Glaspole, Yuben Moodley, Sally Chapman, Samantha Ellis ... Reynolds ... Paul N. Reynolds ... et al
    corecore