Data driven wireless network design : a multi-level modeling approach

A

Smart container monitoring using custom-made WSN technology : from business case to prototype

This paper reports on the development of a prototype solution for tracking and monitoring shipping containers. Deploying wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in an operational environment remains a challenging task. We strongly believe that standardized methodologies and tools could enhance future WSN deployments and enable rapid prototype development. Therefore, we choose to use a step-by-step approach where each step gives us more insight in the problem at hand while shielding some of the complexity of the final solution. We observed that environment emulation is of the utmost importance, especially for harsh wireless conditions inside a container stacking. This lead us to extend our test lab with wireless link emulation capabilities. It is also essential to assess feasibility of concepts and design choices after every stage during prototype development. This enabled us to create innovative WSN solutions, including a multi-MAC framework and a robust gateway selection algorithm

An LSPI based reinforcement learning approach to enable network cooperation in cognitive wireless sensor networks

The number of wirelessly communicating devices increases every day, along with the number of communication standards and technologies that they use to exchange data. A relatively new form of research is trying to find a way to make all these co-located devices not only capable of detecting each other's presence, but to go one step further - to make them cooperate. One recently proposed way to tackle this problem is to engage into cooperation by activating 'network services' (such as internet sharing, interference avoidance, etc.) that offer benefits for other co-located networks. This approach reduces the problem to the following research topic: how to determine which network services would be beneficial for all the cooperating networks. In this paper we analyze and propose a conceptual solution for this problem using the reinforcement learning technique known as the Least Square Policy Iteration (LSPI). The proposes solution uses a self-learning entity that negotiates between different independent and co-located networks. First, the reasoning entity uses self-learning techniques to determine which service configuration should be used to optimize the network performance of each single network. Afterwards, this performance is used as a reference point and LSPI is used to deduce if cooperating with other co-located networks can lead to even further performance improvements

Benchmarking of localization solutions : guidelines for the selection of evaluation points

Indoor localization solutions are key enablers for next-generation indoor navigation and track and tracing solutions. As a result, an increasing number of different localization algorithms have been proposed and evaluated in scientific literature. However, many of these publications do not accurately substantiate the used evaluation methods. In particular, many authors utilize a different number of evaluation points, but they do not (i) analyze if the number of used evaluation points is sufficient to accurately evaluate the performance of their solutions and (ii) report on the uncertainty of the published results. To remedy this, this paper evaluates the influence of the selection of evaluation points. Based on statistical parameters such as the standard error of the mean value, an estimator is defined that can be used to quantitatively analyze the impact of the number of used evaluation points on the confidence interval of the mean value of the obtained results. This estimator is used to estimate the uncertainty of the presented accuracy results, and can be used to identify if more evaluations are required. To validate the proposed estimator, two different localization algorithms are evaluated in different testbeds and using different types of technology, showing that the number of required evaluation points does indeed vary significantly depending on the evaluated solution. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved