13 research outputs found

    Intra-abdominal pulmonary secuestration as an exceptional cause of abdominal mass in the adult

    Get PDF
    AbstractINTRODUCTIONPulmonary sequestration (PS) is an extremely rare malformation defined as a portion of lung tissue isolated from the pulmonary system. PSs are classified into intralobar type and intra-abdominal PS that represents only 2.5% of cases. There are 20 cases of PS reported in adults and only two were managed by laparoscopic approach. We report a case of intra-abdominal PS mimicking a gastroesophageal duplication cyst in an adult. Besides its rarity, this is the first intra-abdominal PS in an adult managed by an anterior laparoscopic approach.PRESENTATION OF CASEA 60-year-old female patient had had epigastric and left upper quadrant pain for several days. Physical examination was normal. Image test were consistent with a gastroesophageal duplication. The patient was taken to the operating room for laparoscopic exploration and resection. The pathological diagnosis was extralobar pulmonary sequestration.DISCUSSIONLess than 20 cases of PS have been reported in adults and only two cases were managed by a lateral laparoscopic approach. In contrast to these reports, we used an anterior approach due to the GEJ suspected origin of the mass.CONCLUSIONExtralobar intra-abdominal PS is an extremely rare condition during adulthood but this diagnosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of a left-sided suprarenal mass. Due to the difficulty in achieving a definitive preoperative diagnosis, surgery is recommended. Laparoscopic resection is safe and effective but careful preoperative imaging studies are recommended in order to plan the most suitable approach

    High prevalence of anti-C1q antibodies in biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Anti-C1q antibodies (anti-C1q) have been shown to correlate positively with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) nephritis. Several clinical studies indicated a high negative predictive value, suggesting that active lupus nephritis is rarely seen in patients with no anti-C1q. However, the true prevalence of anti-C1q at the time of active lupus nephritis has not been well established. The aim of this study was to determine prospectively the prevalence of anti-C1q in proven active lupus nephritis at the time of the renal biopsy. METHODS: In this prospective multi-centre study, we investigated adult SLE patients undergoing renal biopsy for suspected active lupus nephritis. Serum samples were taken at the time of the biopsy and analysed for the presence of anti-C1q in a standardized way. The activity of lupus nephritis was classified according to the renal histology. Biopsies were also analysed for the presence of glomerular IgG, C1q and C3 deposition. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients fulfilling at least 4/11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the diagnosis of SLE were included. Out of this, 36 patients had proliferative (class II, III or IV) and two had class V lupus nephritis. All but one patient with proliferative lupus nephritis were positive for anti-C1q (97.2%) compared with the 35% of control SLE patients with inactive lupus nephritis and 25% of SLE patients without lupus nephritis ever. All patients were positive for glomerular C1q (36/36) and 37/38 patients had glomerular IgG deposits. Anti-C1q strongly decreased during successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-C1q have a very high prevalence in biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis, thus a negative test result almost excludes active nephritis. The data support the hypothesis of a pathogenic role of anti-C1q in lupus nephritis
    corecore