Q

The Qweak experiment, which took data at Jefferson Lab in the period 2010 - 2012, will precisely determine the weak charge of the proton by measuring the parity-violating asymmetry in elastic e-p scattering at 1.1 GeV using a longitudinally polarized electron beam and a liquid hydrogen target at a low momentum transfer of Q2 = 0.025 (GeV/c)2. The weak charge of the proton is predicted by the Standard Model and any significant deviation would indicate physics beyond the Standard Model. The technical challenges and experimental apparatus for measuring the weak charge of the proton will be discussed, as well as the method of extracting the weak charge of the proton. The results from a small subset of the data, that has been published, will also be presented. Furthermore an update will be given of the current status of the data analysis

Molecular Remission in Follicular Lymphoma: Is the Era of Residual Disease Monitoring Over? Reply

Item does not contain fulltex

Behandeling van de ziekte van Gaucher in Nederland met enzymvervangingstherapie

FWN – Publicaties zonder aanstelling Universiteit Leide

Intermediate-dose melphalan compared with myeloablative treatment in multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the Dutch Cooperative Group HOVON 24 trial.

Contains fulltext : 34603.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES. The Dutch-Belgian HOVON group performed a randomized phase 3 trial to compare single non-myeloablative intensive treatment with double, intensive treatment in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). DESIGN AND METHODS. Three hundred and three patients with stage II/III MM were randomized after VAD induction chemotherapy to receive two cycles of non-myeloablative intermediate-dose melphalan (70 mg/m2) (single treatment) or the same regimen followed by cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg iv plus total body irradiation (TBI) 9 Gy and autologous stem cell transplantation (double, intensive treatment). In both treatment arms interferon .IIa was given as maintenance until relapse/progression. RESULTS. A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) on protocol treatment with double, intensive therapy (32 % vs 13 %, p<0.001). Double treatment produced better outcome in terms of event-free survival (median 22 vs 21 months, 28% vs 14% at 4 years and 15% vs 7% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.013; univariate HR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94), progression-free survival (median 27 vs 24 months, 33% vs 16% at 4 years, and 17% vs 9% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.006; HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91), but not overall survival (median 50 vs 55 months, 52% vs 56% at 4 years and 39% vs 36% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.51; HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.46). The achievement of a CR had a favorable prognostic impact on event-free survival (HR=0.60 , 95% CI=0.44 -0.82 , p=0.001) and progression-free survival (HR=0.62 , 95% CI=0.45 -0.84, p=0.002). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS. Double, intensive treatment resulted in a better CR rate, event-free survival and progression-free survival but not overall survival compared to single non-myeloablative treatment in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma

The occurrence of graft-versus-host disease is the major predictive factor for response to donor lymphocyte infusions in multiple myeloma.

Contains fulltext : 57130schattenberg.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)The graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) is well established. We now report the outcome of DLI in 54 patients with relapsed myeloma following allogeneic transplantation. Twenty-eight patients (52%) responded, 19 patients (35%) with a partial response and 9 patients (17%) with a complete response. Progression-free and overall survival were 19 and 23 months, respectively. We found that acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) observed in 57% and 47% of patients, respectively, following DLI were the strongest predictors for response. This suggests that targets for GVHD and GVM are identical. In a subgroup analysis, deletion of chromosome 13, as determined by double-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), had no impact on outcome, indicating that these patients are candidates for early allogeneic transplantation followed by DLI, in case of insufficient response

Extended follow up of high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation after vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone induction in amyloid light chain amyloidosis of the prospective phase II HOVON-41 study by the Dutch-Belgian Co-operative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology

Contains fulltext : 155242.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)In a prospective multicenter phase II study, we evaluated the effect of three courses of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation on an intention-to-treat basis. Sixty-nine newly diagnosed patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis were included between November 2000 and January 2006: 37 men and 32 women with a median age of 56 years, including 46% of patients with cardiac and 22% of patients with involvement of 3 or 4 organs. Initial results presented in 2008 showed a 4-year overall survival rate of 62% among all the patients, while the 4-year survival rate after transplantation was 78%. Here we report the long-term follow-up data after a median follow up of 115 months of the patients still alive. Median survival of all patients was 96 months from registration and for the transplanted patients ten years from the date of transplantation. Twelve (12%) patients died during induction therapy with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone, including 8 patients (12%) due to treatment-related mortality. Two patients died within one month following high-dose melphalan. We conclude that vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone should not be applied as induction therapy for intensification in amyloid light chain amyloidosis. However, a 2-step approach consisting of a non-intensive less toxic induction therapy followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation may result in extended survival in newly diagnosed patients with amyloid light chain amyloidosis (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01207094)

Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Predictive Factors for Response and Long-Term Outcome

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome and prognostic factors of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (AlloSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients received 52 DLI courses at a median of 30 months after the previous AlloSCT. Reinduction therapy was administered to 13 patients before DLI. RESULTS: Reinduction therapy was successful in eight of 13 patients. Fourteen patients (52%) responded to DLI, including six patients (22%) who achieved a complete remission (CR). Five patients responded after T-cell dose escalation in subsequent DLIs. Four patients experienced relapse or disease progression (three from partial response and one from CR). Five patients remain in remission more than 30 months after DLI. Major toxicity was acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which was present in 55% and 26% of patients, respectively. Two patients died from bone marrow aplasia. Median overall survival of all patients was 18 months. Overall survival was 11 months for DLI-resistant patients and has not been reached for the responding patients. In two patients, sustained molecular remission was observed. The factors that were correlated with response to DLI were a T-cell dose of more than 1.10(8) cells/kg, response to reinduction therapy, and chemotherapy-sensitive disease before AlloSCT. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the potential and durable graft-versus-myeloma effect of DLI in patients with relapsed MM after AlloSCT. Future studies should be aimed at increasing response rates, especially in patients with chemoresistant disease, and reducing toxicity by limiting GVHD. Adjuvant DLI seems an attractive and promising approach for patients who do not achieve a molecular remission after AlloSC