The Structure of Interpretations in Family Therapy: A Video-Enhanced Exploration *

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73991/1/j.1545-5300.2000.39204.x.pd

D* Production in Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA

This paper presents measurements of D^{*\pm} production in deep inelastic scattering from collisions between 27.5 GeV positrons and 820 GeV protons. The data have been taken with the ZEUS detector at HERA. The decay channel $D^{*+}\to (D^0 \to K^- \pi^+) \pi^+$ (+ c.c.) has been used in the study. The $e^+p$ cross section for inclusive D^{*\pm} production with $5<Q^2<100 GeV^2$ and $y<0.7$ is 5.3 \pms 1.0 \pms 0.8 nb in the kinematic region {$1.3<p_T(D^{*\pm})<9.0$ GeV and $| \eta(D^{*\pm}) |<1.5$}. Differential cross sections as functions of p_T(D^{*\pm}), $\eta(D^{*\pm}), W$ and $Q^2$ are compared with next-to-leading order QCD calculations based on the photon-gluon fusion production mechanism. After an extrapolation of the cross section to the full kinematic region in p_T(D^{*\pm}) and $\eta$(D^{*\pm}), the charm contribution $F_2^{c\bar{c}}(x,Q^2)$ to the proton structure function is determined for Bjorken $x$ between 2 $\cdot$ 10$^{-4}$ and 5 $\cdot$ 10$^{-3}$.Comment: 17 pages including 4 figure

Observation of Scaling Violations in Scaled Momentum Distributions at HERA

Charged particle production has been measured in deep inelastic scattering (DIS) events over a large range of $x$ and $Q^2$ using the ZEUS detector. The evolution of the scaled momentum, $x_p$, with $Q^2,$ in the range 10 to 1280 $GeV^2$, has been investigated in the current fragmentation region of the Breit frame. The results show clear evidence, in a single experiment, for scaling violations in scaled momenta as a function of $Q^2$.Comment: 21 pages including 4 figures, to be published in Physics Letters B. Two references adde

Dancing in the Dark: The Relationship between Policy Research and Policy Making in Dutch Higher Education

The idea that research is directly useful in the policy process has been widely disputed,2 and much has been written about the differences between the contexts or “cultures” in which research is produced and in which policy is made.3 A number of authors, however, have pointed out indirect ways in which policy makers may make use of research findings or have tried to find more complex ways of understanding and describing the relationships between researchers and policy makers.4 It has been proposed, for example, that the categories of researcher and policy maker are not always mutually exclusive and that interactions between all actors involved in this process could be better described as two-way, rather than only as one-way, interactions.