Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q

Chromosome 1 is involved in quantitative anomalies in 50–60% of breast tumours. However, the structure of these anomalies and the identity of the affected genes remain to be determined. To characterise these anomalies and define their consequences on gene expression, we undertook a study combining array-CGH analysis and expression profiling using specialised arrays. Array-CGH data showed that 1p was predominantly involved in losses and 1q almost exclusively in gains. Noticeably, high magnitude amplification was infrequent. In an attempt to fine map regions of copy number changes, we defined 19 shortest regions of overlap (SROs) for gains (one at 1p and 18 at 1q) and of 20 SROs for losses (all at 1p). These SROs, whose sizes ranged from 170 kb to 3.2 Mb, represented the smallest genomic intervals possible based on the resolution of our array. The elevated incidence of gains at 1q, added to the well-established concordance between DNA copy increase and augmented RNA expression, made us focus on gene expression changes at this chromosomal arm. To identify candidate oncogenes, we studied the RNA expression profiles of 307 genes located at 1q using a home-made built cDNA array. We identified 30 candidate genes showing significant overexpression correlated to copy number increase. In order to substantiate their involvement, RNA expression levels of these candidate genes were measured by quantitative (Q)-RT–PCR in a panel of 25 breast cancer cell lines previously typed by array-CGH. Q–PCR showed that 11 genes were significantly overexpressed in the presence of a genomic gain in these cell lines, and 20 overexpressed when compared to normal breast

Exploring the translational potential of clusterin as a biomarker of early osteoarthritis

Abstract Background: Clusterin (CLU; also known as apolipoprotein J) is an ATP-independent holdase chaperone that prevents proteotoxicity as a consequence of protein aggregation. It is a ∼60 kDa disulfide-linked heterodimeric protein involved in the clearance of cellular debris and the regulation of apoptosis. CLU has been proposed to protect cells from cytolysis by complement components and has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease due to its ability to bind amyloid-β peptides and prevent aggregate formation in the brain. Recent studies suggest that CLU performs moonlighting functions. CLU exists in two major forms: an intracellular form and a secreted extracellular form. The intracellular form of CLU may suppress stress-induced apoptosis by forming complexes with misfolded proteins and facilitates their degradation. The secreted form of CLU functions as an extracellular chaperone that prevents protein aggregation. Methods: In this review, we discuss the published literature on the biology of CLU in cartilage, chondrocytes, and other synovial joint tissues. We also review clinical studies that have examined the potential for using this protein as a biomarker in synovial and systemic fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA). Results: Since CLU functions as an extracellular chaperone, we propose that it may be involved in cytoprotective functions in osteoarticular tissues. The secreted form of CLU can be measured in synovial and systemic fluids and may have translational potential as a biomarker of early repair responses in OA. Conclusion: There is significant potential for investigating synovial and systemic CLU as biomarkers of OA. Future translational and clinical orthopaedic studies should carefully consider the diverse roles of this protein and its involvement in other comorbidities. Therefore, future biomarker studies should not correlate circulating CLU levels exclusively to the process of OA pathogenesis and progression. Special attention should be paid to CLU levels in synovial fluid. The Translational potential of this article: There is significant potential for investigating synovial and systemic CLU as a predictive biomarker of osteoarthritis (OA) progression and response to novel treatments and interventions. Given that CLU plays diverse roles in other comorbidities such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and obesity, future translational and clinical orthopaedic biomarker studies should not directly correlate circulating CLU levels to the process of OA pathogenesis and progression. However, special attention should be paid to CLU levels in synovial fluid. The cytoprotective properties of CLU may support the implementation of regenerative strategies and new approaches for developing targeted therapeutics for OA

Emerging technologies and platforms for the immunodetection of multiple biochemical markers in osteoarthritis research and therapy

Abstract Biomarkers, especially biochemical markers, are important in osteoarthritis (OA) research, clinical trials, and drug development and have potential for more extensive use in therapeutic monitoring. However, they have not yet had any significant impact on disease diagnosis and follow-up in a clinical context. Nevertheless, the development of immunoassays for the detection and measurement of biochemical markers in OA research and therapy is an active area of research and development. The evaluation of biochemical markers representing low-grade inflammation or extracellular matrix turnover may permit OA prognosis and expedite the development of personalized treatment tailored to fit particular disease severities. However, currently detection methods have failed to overcome specific hurdles such as low biochemical marker concentrations, patient-specific variation, and limited utility of single biochemical markers for definitive characterization of disease status. These challenges require new and innovative approaches for development of detection and quantification systems that incorporate clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. Emerging platforms and technologies that are already on the way to implementation in routine diagnostics and monitoring of other diseases could potentially serve as good technological and strategic examples for better assessment of OA. State-of-the-art technologies such as advanced multiplex assays, enhanced immunoassays, and biosensors ensure simultaneous screening of a range of biochemical marker targets, the expansion of detection limits, low costs, and rapid analysis. This paper explores the implementation of such technologies in OA research and therapy. Application of novel immunoassay-based technologies may shed light on poorly understood mechanisms in disease pathogenesis and lead to the development of clinically relevant biochemical marker panels. More sensitive and specific biochemical marker immunodetection will complement imaging biomarkers and ensure evidence-based comparisons of intervention efficacy. We discuss the challenges hindering the development, testing, and implementation of new OA biochemical marker assays utilizing emerging multiplexing technologies and biosensors

A white paper on collagen hydrolyzates and ultrahydrolyzates:potential supplements to support joint health in osteoarthritis?

Abstract Purpose of Review: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common forms of arthritis in the general population, accounting for more pain and functional disability than any other musculoskeletal disease. There are currently no approved disease modifying drugs for OA. In the absence of effective pharmacotherapy, many patients with OA turn to nutritional supplements and nutraceuticals, including collagen derivatives. Collagen hydrolyzates and ultrahydrolyzates are terms used to describe collagens that have been broken down into small peptides and amino acids in the presence of collagenases and high pressure. Recent Findings: This article reviews the relevant literature and serves as a White Paper on collagen hydrolyzates and ultrahydrolyzates as emerging supplements often advertised to support joint health in OA. Collagen hydrolyzates have demonstrated some evidence of efficacy in a handful of small scale clinical trials, but their ability to treat and reverse advanced joint disease remains highly speculative, as is the case for other nutritional supplements. Summary: The aim of this White Paper is to stimulate research and development of collagen-based supplements for patients with OA and other musculoskeletal diseases at academic and industrial levels. This White Paper does not make any treatment recommendations for OA patients in the clinical context, but simply aims to highlight opportunities for scientific innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration, which are crucial for the development of novel products and nutritional interventions based on the best available and published evidence

Lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast have distinct genomic and expression profiles.

International audienceInvasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are the two major pathological types of breast cancer. Epidemiological and histoclinical data suggest biological differences, but little is known about the molecular alterations involved in ILCs. We undertook a comparative large-scale study by both array-compared genomic hybridization and cDNA microarray of a set of 50 breast tumors (21 classic ILCs and 29 IDCs) selected on homogeneous histoclinical criteria. Results were validated on independent tumor sets, as well as by quantitative RT-PCR. ILCs and IDCs presented differences at both the genomic and expression levels with ILCs being less rearranged and heterogeneous than IDCs. Supervised analysis defined a 75-BACs signature discriminating accurately ILCs from IDCs. Expression profiles identified two subgroups of ILCs: typical ILCs ( approximately 50%), which were homogeneous and displayed a normal-like molecular pattern, and atypical ILCs, more heterogeneous with features intermediate between ILCs and IDCs. Supervised analysis identified a 75-gene expression signature that discriminated ILCs from IDCs, with many genes involved in cell adhesion, motility, apoptosis, protein folding, extracellular matrix and protein phosphorylation. Although ILCs and IDCs share common alterations, our data show that ILCs and IDCs could be distinguished on the basis of their genomic and expression profiles suggesting that they evolve along distinct genetic pathways