DataSheet1_Variation in the VLF signal noise amplitude during the period of intense seismic activity in Central Italy from 25 October to 3 November 2016.PDF

Recent research shows reductions in the VLF signal noise amplitude that begin before particular earthquakes whose epicentres are more than 100 km away from the signal propagation path. In this paper, we extend this research to studying the noise amplitude during periods of intense seismic activity in a localized area. We analyse variations in the VLF signal noise amplitude over a period of 10 days (25 October–3 November 2016) when 981 earthquakes with the minimum magnitude of 2 occurred in Central Italy. Out of these events, 31 had the magnitude equal or greater than 4, while the strongest one had the magnitude of 6.5. We observe the VLF signal emitted by the ICV transmitter located in Sardinia (Italy) and recorded in Belgrade (Serbia). Bearing in mind that the trajectory of this signal crosses the area in which the observed earthquakes occurred, we extend the existing research to study of variations in the noise amplitude of the signal propagating at short distances from the epicentres of the considered earthquakes. In addition, we analyse the impact of a large number earthquakes on characteristics of the noise amplitude and its reductions before particular events. In order to examine the localization of the recorded changes, we additionally analysed the noise amplitude of two reference signals emitted in Germany and Norway. The obtained results show the existence of the noise amplitude reduction preceding individual strong or relatively strong earthquakes, and earthquakes followed by others that occurred in a shorter time interval. However, the additional noise amplitude reductions are either not pronounced or they do not exist before the considered events in periods of the reduced noise amplitude remain from previous earthquakes. Reductions in noise amplitudes for all observed signals indicate a larger perturbed area through which they spread or its closer location to the receiver. The analysis of daily values of parameters describing the noise amplitude reveals their variations start up to 2 weeks before the seismically active period occurs.</p

Lessons from the 2018-2019 European droughts: a collective need for unifying drought risk management

Drought events and their impacts vary spatially and temporally due to diverse pedo-climatic and hydrologic conditions, as well as variations in exposure and vulnerability, such as demographics and response actions. While hazard severity and frequency of past drought events have been studied in detail, little is known about the effect of drought management strategies on the actual impacts and how the hazard is perceived by relevant stakeholders. In a continental study, we characterised and assessed the impacts and the perceptions of two recent drought events (2018 and 2019) in Europe and examined the relationship between management strategies and drought perception, hazard, and impact. The study was based on a pan-European survey involving national representatives from 28 countries and relevant stakeholders responding to a standard questionnaire. The survey focused on collecting information on stakeholders' perceptions of drought, impacts on water resources and beyond, water availability, and current drought management strategies on national and regional scales. The survey results were compared with the actual drought hazard information registered by the European Drought Observatory (EDO) for 2018 and 2019. The results highlighted high diversity in drought perception across different countries and in values of the implemented drought management strategies to alleviate impacts by increasing national and sub-national awareness and resilience. The study identifies an urgent need to further reduce drought impacts by constructing and implementing a European macro-level drought governance approach, such as a directive, which would strengthen national drought management and mitigate damage to human and natural assets

Lessons from the 2018-2019 European droughts: a collective need for unifying drought risk management

Drought events and their impacts vary spatially and temporally due to diverse pedo-climatic and hydrologic conditions, as well as variations in exposure and vulnerability, such as demographics and response actions. While hazardous severity and frequency of past drought events have been studied in detail, little is known about the effect of drought management strategies on the actual impacts, and how the hazard is perceived by relevant stakeholders for inducing action. In a continental study, we characterised and assessed the impacts and the perceptions of two recent drought events (2018 and 2019) in Europe and examined the relationship between management strategies and drought perception, hazard and impacts. The study was based on a pan-European survey involving national representatives from 28 countries and relevant stakeholders responding to a standard questionnaire. The survey focused on collecting information on stakeholders’ perceptions of drought, impacts on water resources and beyond, water availability and current drought management strategies at national and regional scales. The survey results were compared with the actual drought hazard information registered by the European Drought Observatory (EDO) for 2018 and 2019. The results highlighted high diversity in drought perceptions across different countries and in values of implemented drought management strategies to alleviate impacts by increasing national and sub-national awareness and resilience. The study concludes with an urgent need to further reduce drought impacts by constructing and implementing a European macro-level drought governance approach, such as a directive, which would strengthen national drought management and lessen harm to human and natural potentials