Life cycle assessment of Polychlorinated Biphenyl contaminated soil remediation processes

Goal and scope. A life-cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to evaluate the environmental impacts of the remediation of industrial soils contaminated by polychlorobiphenyl (PCB). Two new bioremediation treatment options were compared with the usual incineration process. In this attributional LCA, only secondary impacts were considered. The contaminated soil used for the experiments contained 200 mg of PCB per kg. Methods. Three off-site treatments scenarios were studied: 1) bioremediation with mechanical aeration, 2) bioremediation with electric aeration and 3) incineration with natural gas. Bioremediation processes were designed from lab-scale, scale-up and pilot experiments. The incineration technique was inspired by a French plant. A semi-quantitative uncertainty analysis was performed on the data. Environmental impacts were evaluated with the CML 2001 method using the Simapro software program. Results and discussion. In most compared categories, the bioremediation processes are favorable. Of the bioremediation options, the lowest environmental footprint was observed for electric aeration. The uncertainty analysis supported the results that compared incineration and bioremediation but decreased the difference between the options of aeration. The distance of transportation was one of the most sensitive parameters, especially for bioremediation. At equal distances between the polluted sites and the treatment plant, bioremediation had fewer impacts than incineration in eight out of thirteen categories. Conclusions. The use of natural gas for the incineration process generated the most impacts. Irrespective of the aeration option, bioremediation was better than incineration. Recommendations. The time of treatment should be taken into account. More precise and detailed data are required for the incineration scenario. More parameters of biological treatments should be measured. LCA results should be completed using ecological and health risk assessment and an acceptability evaluation

Microbial population changes during bioremediation of nitroaromatic - and nitramine-contaminated lagoon

cited By 9International audienceNitration reactions of aromatic compounds are commonly involved in military industrial processes. Military industries treated their process effluents using lagoon systems for many years. In this study, the sediment of a lagoon was investigated from a bioremediation objective. The physico-chemical characterization of the sediments showed the organic nature of the sediment (25.4% carbon with a C:N ¼ 3) highly concentrated in RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine), HMX (octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine) as well as two herbicides Dinoterb (2-tert-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol) and Dinoseb (2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol). Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene clone library revealed the presence of three dominant families, Geobacteriacea, Clostridiaceae and Pseudomonaceae. A bioremediation assay was carried out in anaerobic conditions in order to degrade organic compounds. In these conditions, 100% of Dinoterb and Dinoseb were degraded after 75 days of culture, while RDX and HMX were not consumed. The 16S rRNA gene clone library analysis of this incubation showed a drastic reduction of the final biodiversity composed by clones related to Enterobacteriaceae (especially Leclercia adecarboxylata) and Pseudomonaceae family. It was then suggested that Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonaceae were potentially involved in biodegradation of these two herbicides. To confirm this hypothesis, cultures were carried out with isolated species of Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas citronellolis and L. adecarboxylata in the presence of Dinoterb. The data confirmed that in the presence of glucose, these microorganisms are able to consume Dinoterb

Certification of the First Uranium Oxide micro-particle reference materials for Nuclear Safety and Security, IRMM-2329P and IRMM-2331P

For nuclear safeguards purposes, two new uranium oxide micro-particle isotope reference materials were certified, IRMM-2329P and IRMM-2331P, with 235U enrichments of 3% and 5%, and 236U abundances of 30 µg·g1and 60 µg·g1, respectively. The isotopic compositions of the base materials were measured by TIMS. The production of the uranium oxide particles was achieved using a vibrating orifice aerosol generator (VOAG) and the particles deposited on carbon planchets. Process control verification measurements on dissolved uranium oxide particles were performed by MC-ICPMS. For IRMM-2329P also the uranium amount per particle was certified by TIMS/IDMS and verified by MC-ICPMS/IDMS