Once the shovel hits the ground : Evaluating the management of complex implementation processes of public-private partnership infrastructure projects with qualitative comparative analysis

Much attention is being paid to the planning of public-private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. The subsequent implementation phase – when the contract has been signed and the project ‘starts rolling’ – has received less attention. However, sound agreements and good intentions in project planning can easily fail in project implementation. Implementing PPP infrastructure projects is complex, but what does this complexity entail? How are projects managed, and how do public and private partners cooperate in implementation? What are effective management strategies to achieve satisfactory outcomes? This is the fi rst set of questions addressed in this thesis. Importantly, the complexity of PPP infrastructure development imposes requirements on the evaluation methods that can be applied for studying these questions. Evaluation methods that ignore complexity do not create a realistic understanding of PPP implementation processes, with the consequence that evaluations tell us little about what works and what does not, in which contexts, and why. This hampers learning from evaluations. What are the requirements for a complexity-informed evaluation method? And how does qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) meet these requirements? This is the second set of questions addressed in this thesis

Reviewing the past to learn in the future: Making sense of design errors and failures in construction

Design errors can severely jeopardise safety and contribute to failures in construction and engineering projects. Such failures can have devastating economic, environmental and social consequences. Significant efforts have been made to reduce the incidence of failures through learning from previous disasters and events by modifying building and engineering codes and standards accordingly. Design errors, however, remain an innate feature of construction and engineering projects despite the considerable amount of knowledge that has been accumulated to date. Most errors are identified during construction and require rework, but there is always a potential for some to remain undetected and contribute to failure, and as a result potentially contribute to accidents and loss of life. An examination of the literature research suggests that a series of pathogenic influences contribute to errors and failure. Thus, this paper article examines the circumstances and issues that contributed to a series of construction and engineering failures to enable development of a learning framework that can be used to mitigate design errors and potential failures and accidents. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Desvios de custos e prazos em empreendimentos da construção civil: categorização e fatores de influência

Desvios de custos e prazos são desafios recorrentes na construção civil. Neste artigo, os autores objetivaram revisar sistematicamente a literatura relacionada a desvios de prazos e custos para determinar uma estrutura de categorização e respectivos fatores responsáveis por esses desvios. Foi empregada a abordagem Systematic Literature Review (Revisão Sistemática de Literatura - RSL) de maneira metódica, para proporcionar acompanhamento e reprodução futura. Informações relevantes foram extraídas dos artigos selecionados e posteriormente sintetizadas para a obtenção da proposta de categorização e respectivos fatores responsáveis pelos desvios. Nove categorias foram identificadas e definidas com base em seus determinantes: relações governamentais; contratos; organização; gerenciamento; financiamento; projeto e documentação; alterações de escopo; aspectos ambientais e econômicos; e atividades e equipamentos. Além disso, 95 fatores de influência foram identificados e anexados às categorias pertinentes. Apesar de a literatura ser heterogênea em relação a contextos e regiões globais, o que dificulta a condução da RSL, houve boa sustentação para os fatores identificados. Escassez de evidências foram identificadas na América Latina, particularmente no Brasil. A literatura existente em desvios de prazos e custos até o momento se mostrou multifacetada, com 92 artigos publicados em 46 fontes diferentes no intervalo de tempo de 1985 a 2014. A maioria das pesquisas teve como foco o estudo de alguns desses fatores em particular, enquanto esta pesquisa classificou-os e sintetizou-os de forma a possibilitar uma visão nova e mais abrangente sobre o fenômeno